Literature DB >> 24584708

Comparisons of cone electroretinograms after indocyanine green-, brilliant blue G-, or triamcinolone acetonide-assisted macular hole surgery.

Shigeki Machida1, Yoshiharu Toba, Tomoharu Nishimura, Takayuki Ohzeki, Ken-ichi Murai, Daijiro Kurosaka.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the function of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) using the photopic negative response (PhNR) in patients who had undergone indocyaine green (ICG)-assisted, brilliant blue G (BBG)-assisted, or triamcinolone acetonide (TA)-assisted internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during macular hole (MH) surgery.
METHODS: Forty-eight eyes of 48 patients with a macular hole were randomly divided into those undergoing ICG-assisted, BBG-assisted, or TA-assisted vitrectomy (n = 16 for each group). Full-field cone ERGs were recorded before and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The amplitudes and implicit times of the a-waves and b-waves and the amplitudes of the oscillatory potentials (OPs) and PhNRs were measured. The mean deviations (MDs) of standard automated perimetry and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured. The circumferential retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was evaluated by SD-OCT.
RESULTS: All macular holes were closed with a significant improvement of the BCVA and MD without differences among the groups. There was no significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative RNFL thickness. The implicit times of the a-waves and b-waves were significantly prolonged, and the ΣOPs amplitude was significantly decreased postoperatively in all groups. These ERG changes were not significantly different among the groups. The postoperative PhNR amplitudes were significantly lower in the ICG group than in the BBG or TA group.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the PhNR may detect subclinical impairments of RGCs caused by the possible toxic effect of ICG. This finding adds to the data that BBG and TA may be safer than ICG for use during MH surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24584708     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2594-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  62 in total

1.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Han Cheng; Ying-Sheng Hu; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008 update).

Authors:  M F Marmor; A B Fulton; G E Holder; Y Miyake; M Brigell; M Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; J W Walters
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Comparative evaluation of no dye assistance, indocyanine green and triamcinolone acetonide for internal limiting membrane peeling during macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Michael S Tsipursky; Matthew A Heller; Stephen A De Souza; Alan J Gordon; Joseph S Bryan; Matthew C Ziemianski; Clive H Sell
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Long-term outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling with and without indocyanine green in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Kumagai; Mariko Furukawa; Nobuchika Ogino; Akinori Uemura; Eric Larson
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Axon-tracing properties of indocyanine green.

Authors:  Michel Paques; Olivier Genevois; Angélique Régnier; Ramin Tadayoni; Richard Sercombe; Alain Gaudric; Eric Vicaut
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03

7.  Comparative in vitro safety analysis of dyes for chromovitrectomy: indocyanine green, brilliant blue green, bromophenol blue, and infracyanine green.

Authors:  Sankarathi Balaiya; Vikram S Brar; Ravi K Murthy; Kakarla V Chalam
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Selective loss of the photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy.

Authors:  Yasutaka Gotoh; Shigeki Machida; Yutaka Tazawa
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03

9.  Visual field defects after uneventful vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane with indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Akinori Uemura; Shigeru Kanda; Yushi Sakamoto; Hazuki Kita
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Effects of indocyanine green on retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Aya Iriyama; Saiko Uchida; Yasuo Yanagi; Yasuhiro Tamaki; Yuji Inoue; Kyosuke Matsuura; Kazuaki Kadonosono; Makoto Araie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  10 in total

1.  Early postoperative evaluation of retinal function by electroretinography after vitreous surgery for idiopathic epimacular membrane.

Authors:  Akira Watanabe; Tamaki Gekka; Kota Arai; K Kohzaki; Hiroshi Tsuneoka
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Nabin R Joshi; Emma Ly; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Comparisons of focal macular electroretinograms after indocyanine green-, brilliant blue G-, or triamcinolone acetonide-assisted macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Shigeki Machida; Tomoharu Nishimura; Takayuki Ohzeki; Ken-Ichi Murai; Daijiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Internal limiting membrane peeling with different dyes in the surgery of idiopathic macular hole: a systematic review of literature and network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Li; Ran You; Min Li; Xiao-Xiao Guo; Lu Zhao; Yan-Ling Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 5.  Efficacy of different doses of dye-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling in idiopathic macular hole: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Li; Min Li; Ran You; Hui-Hui Wang; Lu Zhao; Yan-Ling Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Comparisons of photopic negative responses elicited by different conditions from glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Yuji Hara; Shigeki Machida; Satoshi Ebihara; Masahiko Ishizuka; Atsushi Tada; Tomoharu Nishimura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 7.  A Review of Surgical Outcomes and Advances for Macular Holes.

Authors:  Peng-Peng Zhao; Shuang Wang; Nan Liu; Zhi-Min Shu; Jin-Song Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Comparisons of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after indocyanine green, brilliant blue g, or triamcinolone acetonide-assisted macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Toba; Shigeki Machida; Daijiro Kurosaka
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 9.  Optimal management of idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Haifa A Madi; Ibrahim Masri; David H Steel
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-13

10.  Use of Brilliant Blue G in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Takahiko Hayashi; Kentaro Yuda; Itaru Oyakawa; Naoko Kato
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.