Literature DB >> 26047172

The Photopic Negative Response in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Heather E Moss1, Jason C Park2, J Jason McAnany2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the photopic negative response (PhNR) as an index of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) function in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).
METHODS: Amplitude and implicit time of the PhNR, as elicited by full-field, brief-luminance flashes, was measured in IIH (n = 10) and visually normal control (n = 15) subjects. Visual function was assessed in IIH subjects using standard automated perimetry mean deviation (SAP-MD) scores. Optic nerve structure was evaluated using the Frisén papilledema grading scale (FPG). Macula ganglion cell complex volume (GCCV) was extracted from optical coherence tomography images to assess RGC loss.
RESULTS: Median PhNR amplitude was significantly lower in IIH subjects compared with control subjects (P = 0.015, Mann-Whitney Rank Sum [MW]), but implicit time was similar (P = 0.54, MW). In IIH subjects, PhNR amplitude and SAP-MD were correlated (Pearson's r = 0.78, P = 0.008). Ganglion cell complex volume was correlated with both SAP-MD (r = 0.72, P = 0.019) and PhNR amplitude (r = 0.77, P = 0.009). Multivariate linear regression models demonstrated that the correlation between GCCV and PhNR amplitude was improved by accounting for FPG in the model (r = 0.94, P < 0.0001), but the correlation between GCCV and SAP-MD was not (r = 0.74, P = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Photopic negative response amplitude, which can be decreased in IIH subjects, correlates well with a clinical measure of visual function (SAP-MD). In multivariate models, it correlated with both an imaging measure of chronic ganglion cell injury (GCCV) and a clinical measure of acute optic nerve head pathology (FPG). Further studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of PhNR as a marker for diagnosis and monitoring of IIH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26047172      PMCID: PMC4466812          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-16586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  29 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Deborah I Friedman; Daniel M Jacobson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-11-26       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Han Cheng; Ying-Sheng Hu; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Quality and reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in two spectral-domain optical coherence tomography machines.

Authors:  Ilse Krebs; Eva Smretschnig; Sarah Moussa; Werner Brannath; Irene Womastek; Susanne Binder
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; J W Walters
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Critical pathogenic events underlying progression of neurodegeneration in glaucoma.

Authors:  David J Calkins
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.

Authors:  Harsha L Rao; Ravi K Yadav; Viquar U Begum; Uday K Addepalli; Nikhil S Choudhari; Sirisha Senthil; Chandra S Garudadri
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Visual evoked potentials in pseudotumor cerebri.

Authors:  P S Sørensen; W Trojaborg; F Gjerris; B Krogsaa
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1985-02

9.  Selective loss of the photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy.

Authors:  Yasutaka Gotoh; Shigeki Machida; Yutaka Tazawa
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03

10.  Epidemiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a prospective and case-control study.

Authors:  K Radhakrishnan; A K Thacker; N H Bohlaga; J C Maloo; S E Gerryo
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.181

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm Shifts in Ophthalmic Diagnostics.

Authors:  J Sebag; Alfredo A Sadun; Eric A Pierce
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2016-08

2.  Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Nabin R Joshi; Emma Ly; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Electroretinography in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: comparison of the pattern ERG and the photopic negative response.

Authors:  Jason C Park; Heather E Moss; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ortiz; David Drucker; Connor Hyde; Joseph Staffetti; Jan Kremers; Radouil Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Electrophysiological and pupillometric measures of inner retina function in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Jason C Park; Felix Y Chau; Jennifer I Lim; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Objective Measures of Visual Function in Papilledema.

Authors:  Heather E Moss
Journal:  Adv Ophthalmol Optom       Date:  2016-08

7.  Multifocal Electroretinogram Photopic Negative Response: A Reliable Paradigm to Detect Localized Retinal Ganglion Cells' Impairment in Retrobulbar Optic Neuritis Due to Multiple Sclerosis as a Model of Retinal Neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Lucilla Barbano; Lucia Ziccardi; Giulio Antonelli; Carolina Gabri Nicoletti; Doriana Landi; Giorgia Mataluni; Benedetto Falsini; Girolama Alessandra Marfia; Diego Centonze; Vincenzo Parisi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

8.  Comparison of photopic negative response measurements in the time and time-frequency domains.

Authors:  Hansa Kundra; Jason C Park; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Exploratory Study of the Association between the Severity of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Electroretinogram Photopic Negative Response Amplitude Obtained Using a Handheld Device.

Authors:  Antony Raharja; Shaun M Leo; Isabelle Chow; Mathura Indusegaran; Christopher J Hammond; Omar A Mahroo; Sui H Wong
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13

10.  Photopic negative response (PhNR) in the diagnosis and monitoring of raised intracranial pressure in children: a prospective cross-sectional and longitudinal protocol.

Authors:  Oliver Rajesh Marmoy; Emma Hodson-Tole; Dorothy Ann Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.