Literature DB >> 22273475

The effect of stylet choice on the success rate of intubation using the GlideScope video laryngoscope in the emergency department.

John C Sakles1, Leah Kalin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether the using the GlideRite rigid stylet (GRS) compared with a standard malleable stylet (SMS) affects the success rate of intubation using the GlideScope in emergency intubations.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected continuous quality improvement (CQI) data based on intubations performed in an academic emergency department (ED) over a 4-year period. Following each intubation the operator completed a data form regarding multiple aspects of the intubation, including the device used, type of stylet used, procedural complications, outcome of the intubation, difficult airway predictors (DAPs), and the operator's postgraduate year (PGY). Intubation was considered successful if the GlideScope was used as the initial device and resulted in successful intubation of the trachea.
RESULTS: Over the 4-year study period, the GlideScope video laryngoscope (GVL) was used for 473 intubations. Of these, 322 (68%) used the GRS, while 151 (32%) used the SMS. When the GRS was used, operators were ultimately successful in 93.5% of cases (301 of 322), whereas when the SMS was used, operators were successful in 78.1% of cases (118 of 151; p < 0.0001). The first-attempt success rate for the GRS group was 82.9% (267 of 322) and for the SMS group was 67.5% (102 of 151; p < 0.001). The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) complication rate was 0.25 (±0.5) in the GRS group and was 0.47 (±0.7) in the SMS group (p = 0.0003). In the GRS group, 18% of patients (58 of 322) had oxygen desaturation, while in the SMS group, 31% of patients (46 of 151) had oxygen desaturation (p = 0.003). The mean number of DAPs was 2.0 (±1.5) in the GRS group and 2.0 (±1.5) in the SMS group (p = 0.65). The mean (±SD) PGY of the operator was 2.2 (±0.8) years in the GRS group and 2.2 (±0.8) years in the SMS group (p = 0.79).
CONCLUSIONS: Both first-attempt and ultimate success rates were higher with GlideScope intubations in the ED when the rigid stylet was used compared to the malleable stylet. The number of complications and, in particular, the incidence of oxygen desaturation were lower in the GRS group than in the SMS group. The two stylet groups were similar regarding difficulty of the airway and experience level of the operator.
© 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22273475      PMCID: PMC5100824          DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01271.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  7 in total

1.  A randomized comparison of the GlideRite(®) Rigid Stylet to a malleable stylet for orotracheal intubation by novices using the GlideScope(®).

Authors:  Philip M Jones; Francis L C Loh; Hesham N Youssef; Timothy P Turkstra
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  The GlideScope video laryngoscope.

Authors:  D J Doyle
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Considerations aimed at facilitating the use of the new GlideScope videolaryngoscope.

Authors:  José V Cuchillo; María A Rodríguez
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  The GlideScope-specific rigid stylet and standard malleable stylet are equally effective for GlideScope use.

Authors:  Timothy P Turkstra; Christopher C Harle; Kevin P Armstrong; Paidrig M Armstrong; Richard A Cherry; Jason Hoogstra; Philip M Jones
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope.

Authors:  Richard M Cooper
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients.

Authors:  Richard M Cooper; John A Pacey; Michael J Bishop; Stuart A McCluskey
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts.

Authors:  Thomas C Mort
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.108

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Emergency Neurological Life Support: Airway, Ventilation, and Sedation.

Authors:  Venkatakrishna Rajajee; Becky Riggs; David B Seder
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jarrod Mosier; Stephen Chiu; Asad E Patanwala; John C Sakles
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Improvement in GlideScope® Video Laryngoscopy performance over a seven-year period in an academic emergency department.

Authors:  John C Sakles; Jarrod Mosier; Asad E Patanwala; John Dicken
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  GlideScope and Frova Introducer for Difficult Airway Management.

Authors:  Alessandra Ciccozzi; Chiara Angeletti; Cristiana Guetti; Roberta Papola; Paolo Matteo Angeletti; Antonella Paladini; Giustino Varrassi; Franco Marinangeli
Journal:  Case Rep Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-08-07

5.  Comparing S-Guide® and Gliderite® Times to Assist Video laryngoscopic Intubation in Patients with Simulated Difficult Airways: A Single-Blinded Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Coralie Nkoulou; Thomas Maibach; Istvan Bathory; Nicolas Fournier; Patrick Schoettker
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2022-04

6.  Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of a Pediatric Simulator by Novice Physicians.

Authors:  Joni E Rabiner; Marc Auerbach; Jeffrey R Avner; Dina Daswani; Hnin Khine
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 1.112

7.  Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and GlideScope® video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency.

Authors:  John C Sakles; Jarrod Mosier; Asad E Patanwala; John Dicken
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-10-29

8.  Comparison of the GlideRite to the conventional malleable stylet for endotracheal intubation by the Macintosh laryngoscope: a simulation study using manikins.

Authors:  Yong Tack Kong; Hyun Jung Lee; Ji Ung Na; Dong Hyuk Shin; Sang Kuk Han; Jeong Hun Lee; Pil Cho Choi
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.