Literature DB >> 25164411

Improvement in GlideScope® Video Laryngoscopy performance over a seven-year period in an academic emergency department.

John C Sakles1, Jarrod Mosier, Asad E Patanwala, John Dicken.   

Abstract

To evaluate the outcomes in first pass success (FPS) of GlideScope (GVL) intubations over a seven-year period in an academic ED. Data were prospectively collected on all patients intubated in an academic ED with a level 1 trauma center over the seven-year period from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2014. Following each intubation, the operator completed a standardized data collection form that included information on patient, operator and procedure characteristics. The primary outcome was first pass success, defined as successful intubation with a single laryngoscope blade insertion. The secondary outcome was the Cormack-Lehane (CL) view of the airway. To adjust for important confounders, a logistic regression model was used to determine the association between academic year and first pass success. In the first year of the study, the first pass success with the GVL was 75.6% (68/90; 95% CI 65.4-84.0%) and the percentage of patients with CL I/II views was 95.6% (86/90; 95% CI 89.0-98.8%). By the seventh year of the study, the first pass success with the GVL increased to 92.1% (128/139; 95% CI 86.3-96.0%) and the percentage of patients with CL I/II views was 94.2% (131/139; 95% CI 89.0-97.5%). In the logistic regression model, first pass success improved during the seven-year period (aOR 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.1; p = 0.008). Over the seven-year period, there was significant improvement in the first pass success of the GVL, without any change in the Cormack-Lehane view, suggesting that there was improvement in the skill of tube delivery with use of the GVL over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25164411     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-014-1122-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  13 in total

Review 1.  The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices.

Authors:  Richard M Levitan; James W Heitz; Michael Sweeney; Richard M Cooper
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Endotracheal intubation using a GlideScope video laryngoscope by emergency physicians: a multicentre analysis of 345 attempts in adult patients.

Authors:  Hyuk Joong Choi; Hyung-Goo Kang; Tae Ho Lim; Hyun Soo Chung; Junho Cho; Young-Min Oh; Young-Min Kim
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  The effect of stylet choice on the success rate of intubation using the GlideScope video laryngoscope in the emergency department.

Authors:  John C Sakles; Leah Kalin
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Utilization of a Glidescope videolaryngoscope for orotracheal intubations in different emergency airway management settings.

Authors:  Hoon Chin Lim; Siang Hiong Goh
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.799

5.  Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of GlideScope® video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations.

Authors:  John C Sakles; Jarrod M Mosier; Stephen Chiu; Samuel M Keim
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Difficult airway management in the emergency department: GlideScope videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Jarrod M Mosier; Uwe Stolz; Stephen Chiu; John C Sakles
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Timothy F Platts-Mills; Danielle Campagne; Brian Chinnock; Brandy Snowden; Larry T Glickman; Gregory W Hendey
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Effect of video laryngoscopy on trauma patient survival: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dale J Yeatts; Richard P Dutton; Peter F Hu; Yu-Wei W Chang; Clayton H Brown; Hegang Chen; Thomas E Grissom; Joseph A Kufera; Thomas M Scalea
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.313

9.  Comparison of the reusable standard GlideScope® video laryngoscope and the disposable cobalt GlideScope® video laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in an academic emergency department: a retrospective review.

Authors:  John C Sakles; Asad E Patanwala; Jarrod Mosier; John Dicken; Nathan Holman
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 10.  Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Donald E G Griesdale; David Liu; James McKinney; Peter T Choi
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.063

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Systematic analysis of airway registries in emergency medicine].

Authors:  F F Girrbach; F Hilbig; M Michael; M Bernhard
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  The use of video laryngoscopy outside the operating room: A systematic review.

Authors:  Emma J Perkins; Jonathan L Begley; Fiona M Brewster; Nathan D Hanegbi; Arun A Ilancheran; David J Brewster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  Videolaryngoscopes for placement of double lumen tubes: Is it time to say goodbye to direct view?

Authors:  M R El-Tahan
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

4.  Changes in the first-pass success rate with the GlideScope video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope: a ten-year observational study in two academic emergency departments.

Authors:  Joon Ki Lee; Hyunggu Kang; Hyuk Joong Choi
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.