BACKGROUND: In recent years, patient-reported outcomes such as health-related quality of life have become important areas of clinician focus in general cancer management. Patients' preferences for, and/or satisfaction with, oral versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy schedules may have a major impact on such outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate preferences for oral or IV chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, crossover trial was conducted in 12 hospitals in Southern Italy, in which 22 patients with advanced colorectal cancer received one cycle oforal capecitabine ± irinotecan or oxaliplatin, followed by one cycle of an IV de Gramont or similar regimen (arm A), or the same regimens in reverse order (arm B). Patients were aged 50-70 years and 21% had a higher level of education (graduate or similar). Patients received oral capecitabine 3500 mg/m/day for 7 days (± irinotecan 180 mg/m or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m on day 1 only), followed by an IV de Gramont regimen ± irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin (FOLFOX); or the two schedules administered in reverse order.The main outcome measure was patients' preferences for oral versus IV chemotherapy, as determined by a pre- and post-treatment therapy preference questionnaire (TPQ). RESULTS: Before treatment, 75% of patients preferred oral therapy. Characteristics that patients considered to be important were that treatment should not interfere with daily activities (100% of patients) and should not cause fatigue (95%), diarrhea (76%), or painful mouth ulcers (76%); other factors considered important were the risk of infection and nausea (90%), and that treatment could be administered at home (65%). After receiving both chemotherapy schedules, only 45% of patients preferred oral therapy, while 55% preferred IV therapy. Among the latter, the most important characteristics influencing treatment choice were less nausea (66%), fewer mood effects (65%), the safety of hospital IV treatment (62%), less interference with family relationships (55%), less vomiting (55%), less interference with daily activities (50%), and less diarrhea (50%). Although the order in which patients received therapy did not influence treatment preference, significantly fewer patients with a lower rather than higher educational level preferred oral therapy (47% vs 80%; chi-square test = 9.9; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that there may be a correlation between educational level and the preference of patients with advanced colorectal cancer for oral or IV chemotherapy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In recent years, patient-reported outcomes such as health-related quality of life have become important areas of clinician focus in general cancer management. Patients' preferences for, and/or satisfaction with, oral versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy schedules may have a major impact on such outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate preferences for oral or IV chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, crossover trial was conducted in 12 hospitals in Southern Italy, in which 22 patients with advanced colorectal cancer received one cycle of oral capecitabine ± irinotecan or oxaliplatin, followed by one cycle of an IV de Gramont or similar regimen (arm A), or the same regimens in reverse order (arm B). Patients were aged 50-70 years and 21% had a higher level of education (graduate or similar). Patients received oral capecitabine 3500 mg/m/day for 7 days (± irinotecan 180 mg/m or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m on day 1 only), followed by an IV de Gramont regimen ± irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin (FOLFOX); or the two schedules administered in reverse order.The main outcome measure was patients' preferences for oral versus IV chemotherapy, as determined by a pre- and post-treatment therapy preference questionnaire (TPQ). RESULTS: Before treatment, 75% of patients preferred oral therapy. Characteristics that patients considered to be important were that treatment should not interfere with daily activities (100% of patients) and should not cause fatigue (95%), diarrhea (76%), or painful mouth ulcers (76%); other factors considered important were the risk of infection and nausea (90%), and that treatment could be administered at home (65%). After receiving both chemotherapy schedules, only 45% of patients preferred oral therapy, while 55% preferred IV therapy. Among the latter, the most important characteristics influencing treatment choice were less nausea (66%), fewer mood effects (65%), the safety of hospital IV treatment (62%), less interference with family relationships (55%), less vomiting (55%), less interference with daily activities (50%), and less diarrhea (50%). Although the order in which patients received therapy did not influence treatment preference, significantly fewer patients with a lower rather than higher educational level preferred oral therapy (47% vs 80%; chi-square test = 9.9; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that there may be a correlation between educational level and the preference of patients with advanced colorectal cancer for oral or IV chemotherapy.
Authors: P M Hoff; R Ansari; G Batist; J Cox; W Kocha; M Kuperminc; J Maroun; D Walde; C Weaver; E Harrison; H U Burger; B Osterwalder; A O Wong; R Wong Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-04-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M M Borner; P Schoffski; R de Wit; F Caponigro; G Comella; A Sulkes; G Greim; G J Peters; K van der Born; J Wanders; R F de Boer; C Martin; P Fumoleau Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: M Miwa; M Ura; M Nishida; N Sawada; T Ishikawa; K Mori; N Shimma; I Umeda; H Ishitsuka Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: S Gujral; T Conroy; C Fleissner; O Sezer; P M King; K N L Avery; P Sylvester; M Koller; M A G Sprangers; J M Blazeby Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2007-05-22 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: S Siena; M Peeters; E Van Cutsem; Y Humblet; P Conte; E Bajetta; D Comandini; G Bodoky; G Van Hazel; T Salek; M Wolf; G Devercelli; M Woolley; R G Amado Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-11-27 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Mélanie Dos Santos; M Lange; R Gervais; B Clarisse; A Capel; M Barillet; J M Grellard; N Heutte; I Licaj; F Joly Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 3.603