Literature DB >> 10894140

Transcutaneously tunneled central venous lines in cancer patients: an analysis of device-related morbidity factors based on prospective data collection.

R E Schwarz1, D G Coit, J S Groeger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term transcutaneous tunneled central venous catheters are frequently placed in cancer patients, accounting for significant costs and morbidity. Factors influencing outcome, though, are poorly studied.
METHODS: Between June 1991 and June 1993, 923 central venous tunneled catheters were placed in 791 patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Placement-, device-, and patient-related parameters were charted prospectively (median follow-up: 120 days) and correlated to device-specific outcome events.
RESULTS: Median patient age was 28.5 years (range: 0.025 - 84.5). Disease distribution included hematologic malignancies (64.7%), solid tumors (30.4%), and others (4.9%). Primary indications for line access included chemotherapy (72.8%), bone marrow transplantation (18.7%), total parenteral nutrition (6.4%), and drug administration (2.1%). There were 11 insertion complications (1.2%), including insertion failure (n = 6), hemorrhage (n = 4), and malposition (n = 1). Subsequent to placement, a proven or suspected device-specific complication occurred in 540 lines (58.5%). Per 10,000 catheter days, there were 17.6 infection episodes, 8.1 thrombotic complications, 6.9 instances of catheter breakage, 3.5 accidental or inadvertent cases of displacement, and 0.6 device leaks. Reasons for line removal or other termination of follow-up were patient's death (32.1%), treatment end (28%), infection (19.6%), suspected infection (6.3%), displacement (6.8%), thrombosis (3.1%), leak (1%), and others (3.1%). Median device-specific duration was 365 days, compared with a median complication-free device-specific duration of 167 days (P < 0.0001), reflecting a highly significant device salvage rate after complications. Catheter tip position emerged as the dominant independent prognostic factor for reduced device-specific duration or complication-free device-specific duration.
CONCLUSIONS: Transcutaneous tunneled central venous lines can be placed safely, with a considerable incidence of subsequent device-specific complications, but a high salvage rate. Factors determining outcome are related to device placement, as well as the patient's disease status. In this study, patients alive 90 days after catheter placement had a 37% chance for a device complication, with a 20% chance for device loss. Future analyses of intermediate-term intravenous access should employ the measurement of device-specific outcome as a reference parameter to assess clinical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10894140     DOI: 10.1007/s10434-000-0441-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  8 in total

1.  Central venous catheter repair is associated with an increased risk of bacteremia and central line-associated bloodstream infection in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Ingrid S Lundgren; Chuan Zhou; Frances R Malone; Nancy G McAfee; Soren Gantt; Danielle M Zerr
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Preferences of patients with advanced colorectal cancer for treatment with oral or intravenous chemotherapy.

Authors:  Candida M Mastroianni; Caterina Viscomi; Silvia Ceniti; Rosanna De Simone; Aldo Filice; Gennaro Gadaleta Caldarola; Stefania Infusino; Caterina Manfredi; Antonio Rea; Claudia Sandomenico; Salvatore Turano; Francesco Serranò; Giovanni Condemi; Carla Cortese; Tullia Prantera; Salvatore Palazzo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Patency of neck veins following ultrasound-guided percutaneous Hickman line insertion.

Authors:  R C Wragg; S Blundell; M Bader; B Sharif; J Bennett; I Jester; P Bromley; G S Arul
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Breast cancer as an acquired thrombophilic state.

Authors:  Vasiliki Kyriazi
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.588

5.  Right or left? Side selection for a totally implantable vascular access device: a randomised observational study.

Authors:  Wen-Ying Lin; Chih-Peng Lin; Chih-Hung Hsu; Ying-Hui Lee; Yi-Ting Lin; Meng-Chi Hsu; Yu-Yun Shao
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials.

Authors:  E Van Cutsem; P M Hoff; P Harper; R M Bukowski; D Cunningham; P Dufour; U Graeven; J Lokich; S Madajewicz; J A Maroun; J L Marshall; E P Mitchell; G Perez-Manga; P Rougier; W Schmiegel; J Schoelmerich; A Sobrero; R L Schilsky
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Role of capecitabine in treating metastatic colorectal cancer in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Feng-Hua Wang; Long Bai; Rui-Hua Xu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Internal jugular vein versus subclavian vein as the percutaneous insertion site for totally implantable venous access devices: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Shaoyong Wu; Jingxiu Huang; Zongming Jiang; Zhimei Huang; Handong Ouyang; Li Deng; Wenqian Lin; Jin Guo; Weian Zeng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.