Literature DB >> 22272723

Further evidence for the likely completeness of the library of solved single domain protein structures.

Jeffrey Skolnick1, Hongyi Zhou, Michal Brylinski.   

Abstract

Recent studies questioned whether the Protein Data Bank (PDB) contains all compact, single domain protein structures. Here, we show that all quasi-spherical, QS, random protein structures devoid of secondary structure are in the PDB and are excellent templates for all native PDB proteins up to 250 residues. Because QS templates have a similar global contour as native, TASSER can refine 98% (90%) of those whose TM-score is 0.4 (0.35) to structures greater than or equal to the 0.5 TM-score threshold (0.74 (0.64) mean TM-score) for CATH/SCOP assignment. On the basis of this and the fact that, at a TM-score of 0.4, 83% (90%) of all (internal) core secondary structure elements are recovered, a 0.40 TM-score is an appropriate fold similarity assignment threshold. Despite the claims of Taylor, Trovato, and Zhou that many of their structures lack a PDB counterpart, using fr-TM-align, at a 0.45 (0.5) TM-score threshold, essentially all (most) are found in the PDB. Thus, the conclusion that the PDB is likely complete is further supported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22272723      PMCID: PMC3351587          DOI: 10.1021/jp211052j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  38 in total

1.  Protein structure comparison using SAP.

Authors:  W R Taylor
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  Conformation-family Monte Carlo: a new method for crystal structure prediction.

Authors:  J Pillardy; Y A Arnautova; C Czaplewski; K D Gibson; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The PDB is a covering set of small protein structures.

Authors:  Daisuke Kihara; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Characterizing the existing and potential structural space of proteins by large-scale multiple loop permutations.

Authors:  Liang Dai; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Why not consider a spherical protein? Implications of backbone hydrogen bonding for protein structure and function.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.676

9.  UCSF Chimera, MODELLER, and IMP: an integrated modeling system.

Authors:  Zheng Yang; Keren Lasker; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Ben Webb; Conrad C Huang; Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Elaine C Meng; Andrej Sali; Thomas E Ferrin
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.867

10.  SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data.

Authors:  Antonina Andreeva; Dave Howorth; Steven E Brenner; Tim J P Hubbard; Cyrus Chothia; Alexey G Murzin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  22 in total

1.  Interplay of physics and evolution in the likely origin of protein biochemical function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Mu Gao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Multistep mutational transformation of a protein fold through structural intermediates.

Authors:  Vlad K Kumirov; Emily M Dykstra; Branwen M Hall; William J Anderson; Taylor N Szyszka; Matthew H J Cordes
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  THE-DB: a threading model database for comparative protein structure analysis of the E. coli K12 and human proteomes.

Authors:  Justin S Diamond; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 4.  Toward a "structural BLAST": using structural relationships to infer function.

Authors:  Fabian Dey; Qiangfeng Cliff Zhang; Donald Petrey; Barry Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Segment assembly, structure alignment and iterative simulation in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 7.431

6.  Biophysics of protein evolution and evolutionary protein biophysics.

Authors:  Tobias Sikosek; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Why Is There a Glass Ceiling for Threading Based Protein Structure Prediction Methods?

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  On the possible origin of protein homochirality, structure, and biochemical function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou; Mu Gao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  On the role of physics and evolution in dictating protein structure and function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Mu Gao; Hongyi Zhou
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  FINDSITE(comb): a threading/structure-based, proteomic-scale virtual ligand screening approach.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.