Literature DB >> 21655593

Why not consider a spherical protein? Implications of backbone hydrogen bonding for protein structure and function.

Michal Brylinski1, Mu Gao, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

The intrinsic ability of protein structures to exhibit the geometric features required for molecular function in the absence of evolution is examined in the context of three systems: the reference set of real, single domain protein structures, a library of computationally generated, compact homopolypeptides, artificial structures with protein-like secondary structural elements, and quasi-spherical random proteins packed at the same density as proteins but lacking backbone secondary structure and hydrogen bonding. Without any evolutionary selection, the library of artificial structures has similar backbone hydrogen bonding, global shape, surface to volume ratio and statistically significant structural matches to real protein global structures. Moreover, these artificial structures have native like ligand binding cavities, and a tiny subset has interfacial geometries consistent with native-like protein-protein interactions and DNA binding. In contrast, the quasi-spherical random proteins, being devoid of secondary structure, have a lower surface to volume ratio and lack ligand binding pockets and intermolecular interaction interfaces. Surprisingly, these quasi-spherical random proteins exhibit protein like distributions of virtual bond angles and almost all have a statistically significant structural match to real protein structures. This implies that it is local chain stiffness, even without backbone hydrogen bonding, and compactness that give rise to the likely completeness of the library solved single domain protein structures. These studies also suggest that the packing of secondary structural elements generates the requisite geometry for intermolecular binding. Thus, backbone hydrogen bonding plays an important role not only in protein structure but also in protein function. Such ability to bind biological molecules is an inherent feature of protein structure; if combined with appropriate protein sequences, it could provide the non-zero background probability for low-level function that evolution requires for selection to occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21655593      PMCID: PMC3289135          DOI: 10.1039/c1cp21140d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  38 in total

1.  Conformation-family Monte Carlo: a new method for crystal structure prediction.

Authors:  J Pillardy; Y A Arnautova; C Czaplewski; K D Gibson; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

3.  Probing the "dark matter" of protein fold space.

Authors:  William R Taylor; Vijayalakshmi Chelliah; Siv Midtun Hollup; James T MacDonald; Inge Jonassen
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  The classification and origins of protein folding patterns.

Authors:  C Chothia; A V Finkelstein
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  Improved method for prediction of protein backbone U-turn positions and major secondary structural elements between U-turns.

Authors:  W P Hu; A Kolinski; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1997-12

6.  UCSF Chimera, MODELLER, and IMP: an integrated modeling system.

Authors:  Zheng Yang; Keren Lasker; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Ben Webb; Conrad C Huang; Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Elaine C Meng; Andrej Sali; Thomas E Ferrin
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 7.  Discrete-continuous duality of protein structure space.

Authors:  Ruslan I Sadreyev; Bong-Hyun Kim; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Fast procedure for reconstruction of full-atom protein models from reduced representations.

Authors:  Piotr Rotkiewicz; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  The RCSB Protein Data Bank: redesigned web site and web services.

Authors:  Peter W Rose; Bojan Beran; Chunxiao Bi; Wolfgang F Bluhm; Dimitris Dimitropoulos; David S Goodsell; Andreas Prlic; Martha Quesada; Gregory B Quinn; John D Westbrook; Jasmine Young; Benjamin Yukich; Christine Zardecki; Helen M Berman; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Fr-TM-align: a new protein structural alignment method based on fragment alignments and the TM-score.

Authors:  Shashi Bhushan Pandit; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  13 in total

1.  The distribution of ligand-binding pockets around protein-protein interfaces suggests a general mechanism for pocket formation.

Authors:  Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Further evidence for the likely completeness of the library of solved single domain protein structures.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Interplay of physics and evolution in the likely origin of protein biochemical function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Mu Gao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  In silico structure-based approaches to discover protein-protein interaction-targeting drugs.

Authors:  Woong-Hee Shin; Charles W Christoffer; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.608

5.  On the possible origin of protein homochirality, structure, and biochemical function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou; Mu Gao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Why not consider a spherical protein? Implications of backbone hydrogen bonding for protein structure and function.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 7.  Implications of the small number of distinct ligand binding pockets in proteins for drug discovery, evolution and biochemical function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Mu Gao; Ambrish Roy; Bharath Srinivasan; Hongyi Zhou
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  An Evolution-Based Approach to De Novo Protein Design.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Brender; David Shultis; Naureen Aslam Khattak; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

9.  On the role of physics and evolution in dictating protein structure and function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Mu Gao; Hongyi Zhou
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  An artificial neural network approach to improving the correlation between protein energetics and the backbone structure.

Authors:  Timothy M Fawcett; Stephanie J Irausquin; Mikhail Simin; Homayoun Valafar
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.