Literature DB >> 22271341

Physical similarity (and not quantity representation) drives perceptual comparison of numbers: evidence from two Indian notations.

Javier García-Orza1, Manuel Perea, Reem Abu Mallouh, Manuel Carreiras.   

Abstract

Numerical quantity seems to affect the response in any task that involves numbers, even in tasks that do not demand access to quantity (e.g., perceptual tasks). That is, readers seem to activate quantity representations upon the mere presentation of integers. One important piece of evidence in favor of this view comes from the finding of a distance effect in perceptual tasks: When one compares two numbers, response times (RTs) are a function of the numerical distance between them. However, recent studies have suggested that the physical similarity between Arabic numbers is strongly correlated with their numerical distance, and that the former could be a better predictor of RT data in perceptual tasks in which magnitude processing is not required (Cohen, 2009a). The present study explored the Persian and Arabic versions of Indian numbers (Exps. 1 and 2, respectively). Naïve participants (speakers of Spanish) and users of these notations (Pakistanis and Jordanians) participated in a physical same-different matching task. The RTs of users of the Indian notations were regressed on perceptual similarity (estimated from the Spanish participants' RTs) and numerical distance. The results showed that, regardless of the degree of correlation between the perceptual similarity function and the numerical distance function, the critical predictor for RTs was perceptual similarity. Thus, participants do not automatically activate Indian integers' quantity representations, at least not when these numbers are presented in simple perceptual tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22271341     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0212-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

2.  Naming two-digit arabic numerals: evidence from masked priming studies.

Authors:  Elie Ratinckx; Marc Brysbaert; Wim Fias
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Are Arabic and verbal numbers processed in different ways?

Authors:  Roi Cohen Kadosh; Avishai Henik; Orly Rubinsten
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research.

Authors:  R F Lorch; J L Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Specifying the relations between automaticity and consciousness: a theoretical note.

Authors:  J Tzelgov
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1997 Jun-Sep

6.  Is three greater than five: the relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks.

Authors:  A Henik; J Tzelgov
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-07

7.  Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

Authors:  R S Moyer; T K Landauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Integers do not automatically activate their quantity representation.

Authors:  Dale J Cohen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

9.  Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing.

Authors:  S Dehaene; R Akhavein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Across-notation automatic numerical processing.

Authors:  Dana Ganor-Stern; Joseph Tzelgov
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  7 in total

1.  How numbers mean: Comparing random walk models of numerical cognition varying both encoding processes and underlying quantity representations.

Authors:  Dale J Cohen; Philip T Quinlan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Cross-format physical similarity effects and their implications for the numerical cognition architecture.

Authors:  Dale J Cohen; Erin Warren; Daryn Blanc-Goldhammer
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Single-digit Arabic numbers do not automatically activate magnitude representations in adults or in children: evidence from the symbolic same-different task.

Authors:  Becky Wong; Dénes Szücs
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-09-25

4.  Arabic digits and spoken number words: Timing modulates the cross-modal numerical distance effect.

Authors:  Chia-Yuan Lin; Silke M Göbel
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Further insights into the operation of the Chinese number system: Competing effects of Arabic and Mandarin number formats.

Authors:  Philip T Quinlan; Dale J Cohen; Xingyu Liu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-11

6.  Length is not all that matters: testing the role of number identity and the ratio of fillers in comparisons of multi-digits with different digit length.

Authors:  Javier García-Orza; Ismael Gutiérrez-Cordero; Carlos Larios; Anikó Csilinkó; Juan Antonio Álvarez-Montesinos
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-18

7.  Reevaluating the two-representation model of numerical magnitude processing.

Authors:  Ting Jiang; Wenfeng Zhang; Wen Wen; Haiting Zhu; Han Du; Xiangru Zhu; Xuefei Gao; Hongchuan Zhang; Qi Dong; Chuansheng Chen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.