Literature DB >> 18315418

Across-notation automatic numerical processing.

Dana Ganor-Stern1, Joseph Tzelgov.   

Abstract

In this article, the authors explored the existence of across-notation automatic numerical processing using size comparison and same-different paradigms. Participants were Arabic speakers, who used 2 sets of numerical symbols -- Arabic and Indian. They were presented with number pairs in the same notation (Arabic or Indian) or in different ones (Arabic and Indian). In the size comparison paradigm, 2 digits differing both numerically and physically were compared on the physical dimension. Nevertheless, there was evidence that participants automatically processed the irrelevant numerical dimension in different notation pairs. In the same-different paradigm, 2 digits were presented either in the same or in different notations. Participants had to indicate whether the 2 digits were physically the same. The results again showed evidence for the automatic processing of numerical magnitude for pairs in different notations. Findings of both experiments suggest that numbers in different notations are automatically translated into a common representation of magnitude, in line with M. McCloskey's (1992) abstract representation model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18315418     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  21 in total

1.  Physical similarity (and not quantity representation) drives perceptual comparison of numbers: evidence from two Indian notations.

Authors:  Javier García-Orza; Manuel Perea; Reem Abu Mallouh; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Numerical magnitude processing in abacus-trained children with superior mathematical ability: an EEG study.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Feng-lei Du; Yuan Yao; Qun Wan; Xiao-Song Wang; Fei-Yan Chen
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Numerical representations are neither abstract nor automatic.

Authors:  Dale J Cohen
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  The numerical distance effect is task dependent.

Authors:  Liat Goldfarb; Avishai Henik; Orly Rubinsten; Yafit Bloch-David; Limor Gertner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

5.  Individual differences influence two-digit number processing, but not their analog magnitude processing: a large-scale online study.

Authors:  Stefan Huber; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Ulf-Dietrich Reips; Mojtaba Soltanlou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-23

6.  How numbers mean: Comparing random walk models of numerical cognition varying both encoding processes and underlying quantity representations.

Authors:  Dale J Cohen; Philip T Quinlan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Spatial attention shifts contribute to the size congruity effect.

Authors:  Anqi Wang; Yi Pan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Automatic place-value activation in magnitude-irrelevant parity judgement.

Authors:  Krzysztof Cipora; Mojtaba Soltanlou; Stefan Smaczny; Silke M Göbel; Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-11-16

9.  Cross-format physical similarity effects and their implications for the numerical cognition architecture.

Authors:  Dale J Cohen; Erin Warren; Daryn Blanc-Goldhammer
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Integers do not automatically activate their quantity representation.

Authors:  Dale J Cohen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.