Literature DB >> 7738503

Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing.

S Dehaene1, R Akhavein.   

Abstract

Participants performed same-different judgments for pairs of numerals in 2 conditions: numerical matching (responding "same" to pairs such as 2-TWO), or physical matching (responding "different" to pairs such as 2-TWO). In most cases, a distance effect was obtained, with the different responses being slower when the 2 numbers were numerically close together (e.g., 1-2) than when they were further apart (e.g., 1-8). This indicates that numbers were automatically converted mentally into quantities, even when the participants had been told to attend exclusively to their physical characteristics. As postulated by several models of number processing, (e.g., Dehaene, 1992; McCloskey, 1992) Arabic and verbal numerals thus appear to converge toward a common semantic representation of quantities. However, the present results suggest that an asemantic transcoding route might allow for a direct mapping of Arabic and verbal numbers, perhaps by means of a common phonological representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7738503     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.2.314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  68 in total

1.  Cognitive neuropsychological models of adult calculation and number processing: the role of the surface format of numbers.

Authors:  G Deloche; K Willmes
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  Quantity determination and the distance effect with letters, numbers, and shapes: a functional MR imaging study of number processing.

Authors:  Robert K Fulbright; Stephanie C Manson; Pawel Skudlarski; Cheryl M Lacadie; John C Gore
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Differences between digit naming and number word reading in a flanker task.

Authors:  Anja Ischebeck
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

4.  Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ito; Takeshi Hatta
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

5.  Physical similarity (and not quantity representation) drives perceptual comparison of numbers: evidence from two Indian notations.

Authors:  Javier García-Orza; Manuel Perea; Reem Abu Mallouh; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

6.  Numbers can move our hands: a spatial representation effect in digits handwriting.

Authors:  Gelsomina Perrone; Maria Dolores de Hevia; Emanuela Bricolo; Luisa Girelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Activation and selection of arithmetic facts: The role of numerical format.

Authors:  Patricia Megías; Pedro Macizo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02

8.  Numerical magnitude processing in abacus-trained children with superior mathematical ability: an EEG study.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Feng-lei Du; Yuan Yao; Qun Wan; Xiao-Song Wang; Fei-Yan Chen
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Mental subtraction and multiplication recruit both phonological and visuospatial resources: evidence from a symmetric dual-task design.

Authors:  Seda Cavdaroglu; A Knops
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-05-08

10.  Integers do not automatically activate their quantity representation.

Authors:  Dale J Cohen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.