Literature DB >> 22270864

Sex-related outcome differences after implantation of low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Norbert Kastner1, Gerald Gruber, Birgit A Aigner, Jörg Friesenbichler, Michael Pechmann, Florentine Fürst, Patrick Vavken, Andreas Leithner, Patrick Sadoghi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to investigate outcome differences between female and male patients after implantation of low-contact-stress (LCS) mobile-bearing total knee prostheses at a minimum follow-up of five years with respect to clinical and radiological parameters.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 128 prostheses in 126 patients (90 women and 34 men) using our hospital database. Data was extracted with respect to range of motion (ROM), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, the Knee Society Score (KSS) and radiolucent lines on conventional X-rays.
RESULTS: At follow-up, we observed no significant differences between female and male patients after LCS total knee prostheses. Benefit after implantation of LCS total knee prostheses after five years of minimum follow-up was not significantly different between female and male patients in terms of clinical outcome or radiolucent lines.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no factors in favour of gender-specific total knee prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22270864      PMCID: PMC3385906          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1486-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  21 in total

1.  Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements.

Authors:  F F Buechel; F F Buechel; M J Pappas; J D'Alessio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Prevalence of significant knee pain among older Americans: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  R E Andersen; C J Crespo; S M Ling; J M Bathon; S J Bartlett
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; David F Dalury; David Zurakowski; Richard D Scott
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden.

Authors:  O Robertsson; M Dunbar; T Pehrsson; K Knutson; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-06

5.  Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems.

Authors:  Kirby Hitt; John R Shurman; Kenneth Greene; Joseph McCarthy; Joseph Moskal; Tim Hoeman; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Higher cumulative revision rate of knee arthroplasties in younger patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ola L A Harrysson; Otto Robertsson; Jamal F Nayfeh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  World experience with low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a literature review.

Authors:  James B Stiehl
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  My platform moveth and that's all that's needed!

Authors:  F F Buechel
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Radiolucent lines in low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a blinded and matched case control study.

Authors:  Patrick Sadoghi; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Weber; Jörg Friesenbichler; Gerald Gruber; Norbert Kastner; Katrin Pohlmann; Volkmar Jansson; Bernd Wegener
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The prevalence of pain and pain interference in a general population of older adults: cross-sectional findings from the North Staffordshire Osteoarthritis Project (NorStOP).

Authors:  Elaine Thomas; George Peat; Lindsey Harris; Ross Wilkie; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  6 in total

1.  Size measurement and flexion gap balancing in total knee arthroplasty--new benefits of the Attune™ system?

Authors:  Patrick Sadoghi; Norbert Kastner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Gender-specific outcome after implantation of low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  Norbert Kastner; Birgit A Aigner; Tobias Meikl; Jörg Friesenbichler; Matthias Wolf; Mathias Glehr; Gerald Gruber; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Surgical management of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Benedikt Proffen; Patrick Vavken; Ronald Dorotka
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-04-26

4.  NexGen® LPS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty: 10-year results.

Authors:  Alessandro Bistolfi; Gwo-Chin Lee; Davide Deledda; Federica Rosso; Paola Berchialla; Maurizio Crova; Giuseppe Massazza
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Impact of the tibial slope on range of motion after low-contact-stress, mobile-bearing, total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Norbert Kastner; Simon Sternbauer; Jörg Friesenbichler; Ines Vielgut; Matthias Wolf; Mathias Glehr; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Mid term results of LCS knee: The Indian experience.

Authors:  Rajesh N Maniar; Tushar Singhi; Bharat Gangaraju; Aniket Patil; Parul R Maniar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.251

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.