Literature DB >> 24781274

NexGen® LPS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty: 10-year results.

Alessandro Bistolfi1, Gwo-Chin Lee, Davide Deledda, Federica Rosso, Paola Berchialla, Maurizio Crova, Giuseppe Massazza.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mobile bearing (MB) knee prostheses were designed to improve the performances of the total knee arthroplasties (TKA). The clinical superiority of MB prosthesis compared to its fixed bearing counterpart has remained elusive. This study prospectively evaluates the cumulative survivorship, clinical, radiographic results, and complications of a large series of MB TKAs in relation to patient age, sex, severity of arthritis, and patellar resurfacing.
METHODS: This study evaluates the 5- to 10-year cumulative survival rate of the NexGen(®) LPS MB. Between 2000 and 2005, we performed a consecutive series of 332 MB, posterior-stabilized TKA in 249 patients (mean age 71.2 years, SD 6.9). The implants were clinically evaluated with the Hospital Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS-KS) and radiographically with the Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation System (KS-RES). The mean follow-up was 76.3 months (minimum 5 years).
RESULTS: The HSS-KS improved from 55 pre-operatively to 86 at the end of follow-up. According to the KS-RES, the implants were anatomically aligned and progressive radiolucent lines appeared in four knees (1.2 %). The patella was selectively resurfaced in 162 of 332 knees. Patients with the patella resurfaced had better clinical results compared to those not resurfaced, but there was no difference in terms of survival. The cumulative survival rate was 98.4 % at 10 years (Kaplan-Meier's analysis).
CONCLUSIONS: This MB implant provided reliable and durable clinical results with a survivorship of over 98 % at 10 years, in unselected patients regardless of age, sex, severity of disease, and patellar treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24781274     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3019-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  28 in total

1.  Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years.

Authors:  S H Stern; J N Insall
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Posterior cruciate condylar total knee arthroplasty. Average 11-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  D A Dennis; M L Clayton; S O'Donnell; R P Mack; E A Stringer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Simultaneous mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement in the same patients. A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes using a similar design of prosthesis.

Authors:  Y-H Kim; D-Y Kim; J-S Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-07

4.  The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement.

Authors:  D L Bartel; V L Bicknell; T M Wright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want.

Authors:  J G Wright; N L Young
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A J Price; J L Rees; D Beard; E Juszczak; S Carter; S White; R de Steiger; C A F Dodd; M Gibbons; P McLardy-Smith; J W Goodfellow; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-01

7.  The outcome of rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty with cement at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Jean-Noel A Argenson; Sebastien Parratte; Abdullah Ashour; Bertrand Saintmard; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The rotating platform mobile bearing TKA.

Authors:  R B Sorrells
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Patellar resurfacing compared with nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A concise follow-up of a randomized trial.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Julienne L Boone; Seth D Rosenzweig; Karen Steger-May; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Fixed or mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chun-Hsiung Huang; Jiann-Jong Liau; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  6 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of low contact stress total knee arthroplasty with different mobile bearing designs.

Authors:  Giuseppe Solarino; Antonio Spinarelli; Massimiliano Carrozzo; Andrea Piazzolla; Giovanni Vicenti; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-08-01

2.  Higher forgotten joint score for fixed-bearing than for mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Thienpont; D Zorman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B L Fransen; D C van Duijvenbode; M J M Hoozemans; B J Burger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparison of ultra-congruent mobile- and fixed-bearing navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty with minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Jung-Won Lim; Young-Bong Ko; Min-Gu Song; Han-Jun Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The presence and influence of mild depressive symptoms on post-operative pain perception following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alessandro Bistolfi; Elisa Bettoni; Alessandro Aprato; Patrizia Milani; Paola Berchialla; Eugenio Graziano; Giuseppe Massazza; Gwo Chin Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Robotic versus conventional primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological long-term results with a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  Kyu-Jin Cho; Jong-Keun Seon; Won-Young Jang; Chun-Gon Park; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.075

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.