Literature DB >> 15123942

Higher cumulative revision rate of knee arthroplasties in younger patients with osteoarthritis.

Ola L A Harrysson1, Otto Robertsson, Jamal F Nayfeh.   

Abstract

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that younger patients treated for osteoarthritis and similar conditions using total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have a lower implant survival rate when compared with older patients. Previous studies have been done on a small number of patients and only included the younger patients. In many cases patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis have been included in the studies and exceptional survival rates have been reported. The current study compared the cumulative revision rate of the components in 33,251 patients older than 60 years and 2606 patients younger than 60 years treated with total knee arthroplasty or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis or similar conditions. Cox regression was used to compare the risk for revision between the two age groups and between gender and the effect of year of operation. The results showed a higher cumulative revision rate for the group of younger patients in all statistical analyses and the risk ratio for revision was significantly lower for the group of older patients. The risk for revision decreased for both groups when considering the year of surgery. This is probably attributable to better implant components and surgical techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15123942     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000127115.05754.ce

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  47 in total

1.  Prosthetic inlay resurfacing for the treatment of focal, full thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle: a bridge between biologics and conventional arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter Bollars; Marc Bosquet; Bruno Vandekerckhove; François Hardeman; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Total knee replacement with ceramic femoral components: a national prospective multicenter study of clinical and radiological outcomes].

Authors:  P Bergschmidt; C Lohmann; D Ganzer; R Bader; S Finze; G Kundt; C Hauzeur; C Lukas; W Rüther; W Mittelmeier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Sex-related outcome differences after implantation of low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Norbert Kastner; Gerald Gruber; Birgit A Aigner; Jörg Friesenbichler; Michael Pechmann; Florentine Fürst; Patrick Vavken; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8-17 years follow-up study of 49 patients.

Authors:  Jaakko Järvenpää; Jukka Kettunen; Hannu Miettinen; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The John Insall Award: gender-specific total knee replacement: prospectively collected clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Steven J MacDonald; Kory D Charron; Robert B Bourne; Douglas D Naudie; Richard W McCalden; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Gender-specific outcome after implantation of low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  Norbert Kastner; Birgit A Aigner; Tobias Meikl; Jörg Friesenbichler; Matthias Wolf; Mathias Glehr; Gerald Gruber; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Maximum recovery after knee replacement--the MARKER study rationale and protocol.

Authors:  Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Lyn March; Jack Crosbie; Ross Crawford; Stephen Graves; Justine Naylor; Alison Harmer; Stephen Jan; Kim Bennell; Ian Harris; David Parker; Helene Moffet; Marlene Fransen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Mid-term results and factors affecting outcome of a metal-backed unicompartmental knee design: a case series.

Authors:  Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont; Lawrence P Lai; Jipan Xie; David R Marker; Michael G Zywiel; Peter M Bonutti
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Celecoxib does not appear to affect prosthesis fixation in total knee replacement: A randomized study using radiostereometry in 50 patients.

Authors:  Andreas Meunier; Per Aspenberg; Lars Good
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.