BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine if women presenting for emergency contraception (EC) at family planning clinics may be interested in using the copper intrauterine device (IUD) for EC. STUDY DESIGN: This convenience sample survey was offered to women who presented for EC at four participating clinics in urban Utah. Anonymous written questionnaires were distributed. The outcome variable of interest was interest in using the copper IUD for EC. RESULTS: Of survey respondents, 320 (34.0%) of 941 said they would be interested in an EC method that was long term, highly effective and reversible. Interested women were not significantly different from noninterested women in relation to age, marital status, education, household income, gravidity, previous abortions, previous sexually transmitted infections (STIs) or relationship status. One hundred twenty women (37.5% of those interested or 12.8% of all those surveyed) would wait an hour, undergo a pelvic exam to get the method and would still want the method knowing it was an IUD. However, only 12.3% of these women could also pay $350 or more for the device. Multivariable regression found the following predictors of interest in the IUD among EC users: non-Hispanic minorities (OR=2.12, 95% CI=1.14-3.93), desire to never be pregnant in the future (OR=2.87, 95% CI=1.38-5.66) and interest in adoption (OR=1.96, 95% CI=1.00-5.73) or abortion (OR=2.68, 95% CI=1.24-4.14) if pregnant when presenting for EC. CONCLUSION: While one third of EC users surveyed at family planning clinics were interested in a long-term, highly effective method of contraception, only a small portion of all EC users may be interested in the copper IUD for EC. Cost is a potential barrier.
BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine if women presenting for emergency contraception (EC) at family planning clinics may be interested in using the copper intrauterine device (IUD) for EC. STUDY DESIGN: This convenience sample survey was offered to women who presented for EC at four participating clinics in urban Utah. Anonymous written questionnaires were distributed. The outcome variable of interest was interest in using the copper IUD for EC. RESULTS: Of survey respondents, 320 (34.0%) of 941 said they would be interested in an EC method that was long term, highly effective and reversible. Interested women were not significantly different from noninterested women in relation to age, marital status, education, household income, gravidity, previous abortions, previous sexually transmitted infections (STIs) or relationship status. One hundred twenty women (37.5% of those interested or 12.8% of all those surveyed) would wait an hour, undergo a pelvic exam to get the method and would still want the method knowing it was an IUD. However, only 12.3% of these women could also pay $350 or more for the device. Multivariable regression found the following predictors of interest in the IUD among EC users: non-Hispanic minorities (OR=2.12, 95% CI=1.14-3.93), desire to never be pregnant in the future (OR=2.87, 95% CI=1.38-5.66) and interest in adoption (OR=1.96, 95% CI=1.00-5.73) or abortion (OR=2.68, 95% CI=1.24-4.14) if pregnant when presenting for EC. CONCLUSION: While one third of EC users surveyed at family planning clinics were interested in a long-term, highly effective method of contraception, only a small portion of all EC users may be interested in the copper IUD for EC. Cost is a potential barrier.
Authors: Cynthia C Harper; J Joseph Speidel; Eleanor A Drey; James Trussell; Maya Blum; Philip D Darney Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: David K Turok; Janet C Jacobson; Amna I Dermish; Sara E Simonsen; Shawn Gurtcheff; Molly McFadden; Patricia A Murphy Journal: Contraception Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Suzan R Goodman; Alison M El Ayadi; Corinne H Rocca; Julia E Kohn; Courtney E Benedict; Jessica R Dieseldorff; Cynthia C Harper Journal: Contraception Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: David K Turok; Jessica N Sanders; Ivana S Thompson; Pamela A Royer; Jennifer Eggebroten; Lori M Gawron Journal: Contraception Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 3.375