Literature DB >> 12941649

IUD-related knowledge, attitudes and practices among Navajo Area Indian Health Service providers.

Eve Espey1, Tony Ogburn, David Espey, Virgil Etsitty.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The IUD once accounted for about half of contraceptive use among Navajo women but is now little used in this population, which has a high rate of unintended pregnancy. Identifying barriers to use--including those stemming from providers' IUD-related knowledge, attitudes and practices--could help expand use of the method.
METHODS: In 2000, 107 Navajo Area Indian Health Service providers who offer contraceptive services completed a mailed survey. Responses of women's health providers and other types of providers were compared, using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method.
RESULTS: Overall, 69-78% of providers had good factual knowledge about the IUD and felt adequately prepared to insert a device or counsel women about it; considerably larger proportions of women's health providers than of others felt able to counsel about and insert IUDs. Sixty-five percent of providers (88% of women's health providers and 50% of others) currently inserted IUDs, and only 8% (none of them women's health providers) never recommended the method. The main reasons providers cited for not recommending the IUD were concerns about its safety and about side effects (mentioned by 69% and 44%, respectively); these concerns did not differ by provider type.
CONCLUSIONS: Provider education and training should focus on insertion techniques and on the safety of available IUDs. Training should be targeted not only to women's health providers, but to family practice physicians, nurse practitioners and other providers who offer family planning counseling and services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12941649     DOI: 10.1363/psrh.35.169.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  6 in total

1.  Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: clinical practice among contraceptive providers.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; J Joseph Speidel; Eleanor A Drey; James Trussell; Maya Blum; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Evidence-based selection of candidates for the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD).

Authors:  Lisa S Callegari; Blair G Darney; Emily M Godfrey; Olivia Sementi; Rebecca Dunsmoor-Su; Sarah W Prager
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  Women's knowledge about intrauterine contraception.

Authors:  Katherine J Hladky; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Clinical training alone is not sufficient for reducing barriers to IUD provision among private providers in Pakistan.

Authors:  Sohail Agha; Aslam Fareed; Joseph Keating
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 5.  Reproductive health disparities: a focus on family planning and prevention among minority women and adolescents.

Authors:  Sadia Haider; Cynthia Stoffel; Geri Donenberg; Stacie Geller
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2013-09

6.  Knowledge and perceptions of the intrauterine device among family planning providers in Nepal: a cross-sectional analysis by cadre and sector.

Authors:  Nirali M Chakraborty; Caitlin Murphy; Mahesh Paudel; Sriju Sharma
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.