Literature DB >> 21438850

What influences young women to choose between the emergency contraceptive pill and an intrauterine device? A qualitative study.

Preeti Bharadwaj1, Jennifer C Saxton, Susan N Mann, Eva M A Jungmann, Judith M Stephenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore key factors influencing young women when choosing between two methods of emergency contraception (EC).
METHODS: We interviewed 26 young women who accessed community sexual and reproductive health services for emergency contraception after they had chosen an EC.
RESULTS: Most women had an unrealistically high expectation about efficacy of the emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) and lacked knowledge of the intrauterine device (IUD) as an alternative method of EC. Previous use, easy accessibility, ease of use, and advice from peers, influenced women to choose the ECP, whereas past experience of abortion, firm motivation to avoid pregnancy, presentation after 72 hours, and considering that an IUD may provide long-term contraception as well, inclined women to choose the IUD. When participants were shown the IUD, many found it to be smaller and less frightening than they had imagined.
CONCLUSIONS: Women need better information and education about the IUD as a highly effective method of EC. Health professionals must provide such information at every opportunity. Showing the IUD during counselling might help correct misconceptions and would improve acceptability. Wider availability of expertise concerning EC-IUDs is essential to assist more women in making informed decisions when choosing a method for EC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21438850     DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2011.565891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  8 in total

1.  Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: clinical practice among contraceptive providers.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; J Joseph Speidel; Eleanor A Drey; James Trussell; Maya Blum; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  U.S. Men's Perceptions and Experiences of Emergency Contraceptives.

Authors:  Rachel L Wright; Peter R Fawson; Caren J Frost; David K Turok
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-07-17

3.  Choice of Emergency Contraceptive and Decision Making Regarding Subsequent Unintended Pregnancy.

Authors:  Pamela A Royer; David K Turok; Jessica N Sanders; Hanna M Saltzman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 4.  The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience.

Authors:  Kelly Cleland; Haoping Zhu; Norman Goldstuck; Linan Cheng; James Trussell
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Discourses on the postcoital pill in young women.

Authors:  M L Bauzà-Amengual; M Esteva; M Ingla-Pol; M A Font-Oliver; S March
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Exploring young women's reasons for adopting intrauterine or oral emergency contraception in the United States: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shelly Kaller; Aisha Mays; Lori Freedman; Cynthia C Harper; M Antonia Biggs
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 7.  Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis.

Authors:  Abimbola A Ayorinde; Felicity Boardman; Majel McGranahan; Lucy Porter; Nwamaka A Eze; Anna Sallis; Rosanna Buck; Alison Hadley; Melissa Ludeke; Sue Mann; Oyinlola Oyebode
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Knowledge and approaches of married men applying to a primary healthcare center in Istanbul about IUD: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Muhammed Fatih Onsuz; Seyhan Hidiroglu; Melda Karavus
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2019-07-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.