Literature DB >> 22267985

Detailed Characterization of 2D and 3D Scatter-to-Primary Ratios of Various Breast Geometries Using a Dedicated CT Mammotomography System.

Jainil Shah1, Jan H Pachon, Priti Madhav, Martin P Tornai.   

Abstract

With a dedicated breast CT system using a quasi-monochromatic x-ray source and flat-panel digital detector, the 2D and 3D scatter to primary ratios (SPR) of various geometric phantoms having different densities were characterized in detail. Projections were acquired using geometric and anthropomorphic breast phantoms. Each phantom was filled with 700ml of 5 different water-methanol concentrations to simulate effective boundary densities of breast compositions from 100% glandular (1.0g/cm(3)) to 100% fat (0.79g/cm(3)). Projections were acquired with and without a beam stop array. For each projection, 2D scatter was determined by cubic spline interpolating the values behind the shadow of each beam stop through the object. Scatter-corrected projections were obtained by subtracting the scatter, and the 2D SPRs were obtained as a ratio of the scatter to scatter-corrected projections. Additionally the (un)corrected data were individually iteratively reconstructed. The (un)corrected 3D volumes were subsequently subtracted, and the 3D SPRs obtained from the ratio of the scatter volume-to-scatter-corrected (or primary) volume. Results show that the 2D SPR values peak in the center of the volumes, and were overall highest for the simulated 100% glandular composition. Consequently, scatter corrected reconstructions have visibly reduced cupping regardless of the phantom geometry, as well as more accurate linear attenuation coefficients. The corresponding 3D SPRs have increased central density, which reduces radially. Not surprisingly, for both 2D and 3D SPRs there was a dependency on both phantom geometry and object density on the measured SPR values, with geometry dominating for 3D SPRs. Overall, these results indicate the need for scatter correction given different geometries and breast densities that will be encountered with 3D cone beam breast CT.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22267985      PMCID: PMC3261764          DOI: 10.1117/12.878809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  3 in total

1.  Accelerated iterative transmission CT reconstruction using an ordered subsets convex algorithm.

Authors:  C Kamphuis; F J Beekman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  An Accurate Scatter Measurement and Correction Technique for Cone Beam Breast CT Imaging Using Scanning Sampled Measurement (SSM) Technique.

Authors:  Xinming Liu; Chris C Shaw; Tianpeng Wang; Lingyun Chen; Mustafa C Altunbas; S Cheenu Kappadath
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2006-02-28

3.  Characterization of scatter in cone-beam CT breast imaging: comparison of experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Bob Liu; J Michael O'Connor; Clay S Didier; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Three dimensional dose distribution comparison of simple and complex acquisition trajectories in dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Jainil P Shah; Steve D Mann; Randolph L McKinley; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Characterization of X-ray scattering for various phantoms and clinical breast geometries using breast CT on a dedicated hybrid system.

Authors:  Jainil P Shah; Steve D Mann; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.535

3.  Implementation and CT sampling characterization of a third-generation SPECT-CT system for dedicated breast imaging.

Authors:  Jainil P Shah; Steve D Mann; Randolph L McKinley; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-07-31

4.  Initial In Vivo Quantification of Tc-99m Sestamibi Uptake as a Function of Tissue Type in Healthy Breasts Using Dedicated Breast SPECT-CT.

Authors:  Steve D Mann; Kristy L Perez; Emily K E McCracken; Jainil P Shah; Terence Z Wong; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.375

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.