Literature DB >> 22266113

Mammographic breast density and breast cancer: evidence of a shared genetic basis.

Jajini S Varghese1, Deborah J Thompson, Kyriaki Michailidou, Sara Lindström, Clare Turnbull, Judith Brown, Jean Leyland, Ruth M L Warren, Robert N Luben, Ruth J Loos, Nicholas J Wareham, Johanna Rommens, Andrew D Paterson, Lisa J Martin, Celine M Vachon, Christopher G Scott, Elizabeth J Atkinson, Fergus J Couch, Carmel Apicella, Melissa C Southey, Jennifer Stone, Jingmei Li, Louise Eriksson, Kamila Czene, Norman F Boyd, Per Hall, John L Hopper, Rulla M Tamimi, Nazneen Rahman, Douglas F Easton.   

Abstract

Percent mammographic breast density (PMD) is a strong heritable risk factor for breast cancer. However, the pathways through which this risk is mediated are still unclear. To explore whether PMD and breast cancer have a shared genetic basis, we identified genetic variants most strongly associated with PMD in a published meta-analysis of five genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and used these to construct risk scores for 3,628 breast cancer cases and 5,190 controls from the UK2 GWAS of breast cancer. The signed per-allele effect estimates of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were multiplied with the respective allele counts in the individual and summed over all SNPs to derive the risk score for an individual. These scores were included as the exposure variable in a logistic regression model with breast cancer case-control status as the outcome. This analysis was repeated using 10 different cutoff points for the most significant density SNPs (1%-10% representing 5,222-50,899 SNPs). Permutation analysis was also conducted across all 10 cutoff points. The association between risk score and breast cancer was significant for all cutoff points from 3% to 10% of top density SNPs, being most significant for the 6% (2-sided P = 0.002) to 10% (P = 0.001) cutoff points (overall permutation P = 0.003). Women in the top 10% of the risk score distribution had a 31% increased risk of breast cancer [OR = 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-1.59] compared with women in the bottom 10%. Together, our results show that PMD and breast cancer have a shared genetic basis that is mediated through a large number of common variants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22266113      PMCID: PMC3378688          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  22 in total

1.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities.

Authors:  J W Byng; N F Boyd; E Fishell; R A Jong; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis.

Authors:  Yurii S Aulchenko; Stephan Ripke; Aaron Isaacs; Cornelia M van Duijn
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Evaluation of polygenic risk scores for predicting breast and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Mitchell J Machiela; Chia-Yen Chen; Constance Chen; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter; Peter Kraft
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Gillian S Dite; Jennifer Stone; Anoma Gunasekara; Dallas R English; Margaret R E McCredie; Graham G Giles; David Tritchler; Anna Chiarelli; Martin J Yaffe; John L Hopper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  N F Boyd; J W Byng; R A Jong; E K Fishell; L E Little; A B Miller; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; M J Yaffe
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Gillian Mitchell; Antonis C Antoniou; Ruth Warren; Susan Peock; Judith Brown; Russell Davies; Jenny Mattison; Margaret Cook; Iqbal Warsi; D Gareth Evans; Diana Eccles; Fiona Douglas; Joan Paterson; Shirley Hodgson; Louise Izatt; Trevor Cole; Lucy Burgess; Ros Eeles; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Mendelian randomisation and causal inference in observational epidemiology.

Authors:  Nuala A Sheehan; Vanessa Didelez; Paul R Burton; Martin D Tobin
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  33 in total

1.  International Consortium on Mammographic Density: Methodology and population diversity captured across 22 countries.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Anya Burton; Isabel dos-Santos-Silva; John H Hipwell; Caroline Dickens; Dorria Salem; Rasha Kamal; Mikael Hartman; Charmaine Pei Ling Lee; Kee-Seng Chia; Vahit Ozmen; Mustafa Erkin Aribal; Anath Arzee Flugelman; Martín Lajous; Ruy Lopez-Riduara; Megan Rice; Isabelle Romieu; Giske Ursin; Samera Qureshi; Huiyan Ma; Eunjung Lee; Carla H van Gils; Johanna O P Wanders; Sudhir Vinayak; Rose Ndumia; Steve Allen; Sarah Vinnicombe; Sue Moss; Jong Won Lee; Jisun Kim; Ana Pereira; Maria Luisa Garmendia; Reza Sirous; Mehri Sirous; Beata Peplonska; Agnieszka Bukowska; Rulla M Tamimi; Kimberly Bertrand; Chisato Nagata; Ava Kwong; Celine Vachon; Christopher Scott; Beatriz Perez-Gomez; Marina Pollan; Gertraud Maskarinec; Graham Giles; John Hopper; Jennifer Stone; Nadia Rajaram; Soo-Hwang Teo; Shivaani Mariapun; Martin J Yaffe; Joachim Schüz; Anna M Chiarelli; Linda Linton; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Distribution of mammographic density and its influential factors among Chinese women.

Authors:  Hongji Dai; Ye Yan; Peishan Wang; Peifang Liu; Yali Cao; Li Xiong; Yahong Luo; Tie Pan; Xiangjun Ma; Jie Wang; Zhenhua Yang; Xueou Liu; Chuan Chen; Yubei Huang; Yi Li; Yaogang Wang; Xishan Hao; Zhaoxiang Ye; Kexin Chen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Breast cancer risk variants at 6q25 display different phenotype associations and regulate ESR1, RMND1 and CCDC170.

Authors:  Alison M Dunning; Kyriaki Michailidou; Karoline B Kuchenbaecker; Deborah Thompson; Juliet D French; Jonathan Beesley; Catherine S Healey; Siddhartha Kar; Karen A Pooley; Elena Lopez-Knowles; Ed Dicks; Daniel Barrowdale; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Richard C Sallari; Kristine M Hillman; Susanne Kaufmann; Haran Sivakumaran; Mahdi Moradi Marjaneh; Jason S Lee; Margaret Hills; Monika Jarosz; Suzie Drury; Sander Canisius; Manjeet K Bolla; Joe Dennis; Qin Wang; John L Hopper; Melissa C Southey; Annegien Broeks; Marjanka K Schmidt; Artitaya Lophatananon; Kenneth Muir; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Julian Peto; Elinor J Sawyer; Ian Tomlinson; Barbara Burwinkel; Frederik Marme; Pascal Guénel; Thérèse Truong; Stig E Bojesen; Henrik Flyger; Anna González-Neira; Jose I A Perez; Hoda Anton-Culver; Lee Eunjung; Volker Arndt; Hermann Brenner; Alfons Meindl; Rita K Schmutzler; Hiltrud Brauch; Ute Hamann; Kristiina Aittomäki; Carl Blomqvist; Hidemi Ito; Keitaro Matsuo; Natasha Bogdanova; Thilo Dörk; Annika Lindblom; Sara Margolin; Veli-Matti Kosma; Arto Mannermaa; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Anna H Wu; Diether Lambrechts; Hans Wildiers; Jenny Chang-Claude; Anja Rudolph; Paolo Peterlongo; Paolo Radice; Janet E Olson; Graham G Giles; Roger L Milne; Christopher A Haiman; Brian E Henderson; Mark S Goldberg; Soo H Teo; Cheng Har Yip; Silje Nord; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Vessela Kristensen; Jirong Long; Wei Zheng; Katri Pylkäs; Robert Winqvist; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Peter Devilee; Caroline Seynaeve; Jonine Figueroa; Mark E Sherman; Kamila Czene; Hatef Darabi; Antoinette Hollestelle; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Keith Humphreys; Yu-Tang Gao; Xiao-Ou Shu; Angela Cox; Simon S Cross; William Blot; Qiuyin Cai; Maya Ghoussaini; Barbara J Perkins; Mitul Shah; Ji-Yeob Choi; Daehee Kang; Soo Chin Lee; Mikael Hartman; Maria Kabisch; Diana Torres; Anna Jakubowska; Jan Lubinski; Paul Brennan; Suleeporn Sangrajrang; Christine B Ambrosone; Amanda E Toland; Chen-Yang Shen; Pei-Ei Wu; Nick Orr; Anthony Swerdlow; Lesley McGuffog; Sue Healey; Andrew Lee; Miroslav Kapuscinski; Esther M John; Mary Beth Terry; Mary B Daly; David E Goldgar; Saundra S Buys; Ramunas Janavicius; Laima Tihomirova; Nadine Tung; Cecilia M Dorfling; Elizabeth J van Rensburg; Susan L Neuhausen; Bent Ejlertsen; Thomas V O Hansen; Ana Osorio; Javier Benitez; Rachel Rando; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Bernardo Bonanni; Bernard Peissel; Siranoush Manoukian; Laura Papi; Laura Ottini; Irene Konstantopoulou; Paraskevi Apostolou; Judy Garber; Muhammad Usman Rashid; Debra Frost; Louise Izatt; Steve Ellis; Andrew K Godwin; Norbert Arnold; Dieter Niederacher; Kerstin Rhiem; Nadja Bogdanova-Markov; Charlotte Sagne; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Francesca Damiola; Olga M Sinilnikova; Sylvie Mazoyer; Claudine Isaacs; Kathleen B M Claes; Kim De Leeneer; Miguel de la Hoya; Trinidad Caldes; Heli Nevanlinna; Sofia Khan; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Maartje J Hooning; Matti A Rookus; Ava Kwong; Edith Olah; Orland Diez; Joan Brunet; Miquel Angel Pujana; Jacek Gronwald; Tomasz Huzarski; Rosa B Barkardottir; Rachel Laframboise; Penny Soucy; Marco Montagna; Simona Agata; Manuel R Teixeira; Sue Kyung Park; Noralane Lindor; Fergus J Couch; Marc Tischkowitz; Lenka Foretova; Joseph Vijai; Kenneth Offit; Christian F Singer; Christine Rappaport; Catherine M Phelan; Mark H Greene; Phuong L Mai; Gad Rennert; Evgeny N Imyanitov; Peter J Hulick; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Marion Piedmonte; Anna Marie Mulligan; Gord Glendon; Anders Bojesen; Mads Thomassen; Maria A Caligo; Sook-Yee Yoon; Eitan Friedman; Yael Laitman; Ake Borg; Anna von Wachenfeldt; Hans Ehrencrona; Johanna Rantala; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Patricia A Ganz; Robert L Nussbaum; Simon A Gayther; Katherine L Nathanson; Susan M Domchek; Banu K Arun; Gillian Mitchell; Beth Y Karlan; Jenny Lester; Gertraud Maskarinec; Christy Woolcott; Christopher Scott; Jennifer Stone; Carmel Apicella; Rulla Tamimi; Robert Luben; Kay-Tee Khaw; Åslaug Helland; Vilde Haakensen; Mitch Dowsett; Paul D P Pharoah; Jacques Simard; Per Hall; Montserrat García-Closas; Celine Vachon; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton; Stacey L Edwards
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Percent mammographic density prediction: development of a model in the nurses' health studies.

Authors:  Megan S Rice; Bernard A Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Novel Associations between Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Risk-Predicting Mammographic Density Measures.

Authors:  Jennifer Stone; Deborah J Thompson; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Christopher Scott; Rulla M Tamimi; Sara Lindstrom; Peter Kraft; Aditi Hazra; Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Per Hall; Matt Jensen; Julie Cunningham; Janet E Olson; Kristen Purrington; Fergus J Couch; Judith Brown; Jean Leyland; Ruth M L Warren; Robert N Luben; Kay-Tee Khaw; Paula Smith; Nicholas J Wareham; Sebastian M Jud; Katharina Heusinger; Matthias W Beckmann; Julie A Douglas; Kaanan P Shah; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie; Loic Le Marchand; Laurence N Kolonel; Christy Woolcott; Gertraud Maskarinec; Christopher Haiman; Graham G Giles; Laura Baglietto; Kavitha Krishnan; Melissa C Southey; Carmel Apicella; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Giske Ursin; Grethe I Grenaker Alnaes; Vessela N Kristensen; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Inger Torhild Gram; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Kyriaki Michailidou; Joe Dennis; Jacques Simard; Paul Pharoah; Alison M Dunning; Douglas F Easton; Peter A Fasching; V Shane Pankratz; John L Hopper; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Does mammographic density mediate risk factor associations with breast cancer? An analysis by tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Megan S Rice; Rulla M Tamimi; Kimberly A Bertrand; Christopher G Scott; Matthew R Jensen; Aaron D Norman; Daniel W Visscher; Yunn-Yi Chen; Kathleen R Brandt; Fergus J Couch; John A Shepherd; Bo Fan; Fang-Fang Wu; Lin Ma; Laura C Collins; Steven R Cummings; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Mammographic density and breast cancer risk by family history in women of white and Asian ancestry.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Kaylae L Nakamura; Christy G Woolcott; Shannon M Conroy; Celia Byrne; Chisato Nagata; Giske Ursin; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Circulating Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-κB (RANK), RANK ligand (RANKL), and Mammographic Density in Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Adetunji T Toriola; Catherine M Appleton; Xiaoyu Zong; Jingqin Luo; Katherine Weilbaecher; Rulla M Tamimi; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2018-10-23

9.  Racial Differences in Quantitative Measures of Area and Volumetric Breast Density.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Brad M Keller; Lauren M Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Marie Synnestvedt; Emily F Conant; Katrina Armstrong; Despina Kontos
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Common Genetic Variation and Breast Cancer Risk-Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Jenna Lilyquist; Kathryn J Ruddy; Celine M Vachon; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.