Literature DB >> 26724463

International Consortium on Mammographic Density: Methodology and population diversity captured across 22 countries.

Valerie A McCormack1, Anya Burton2, Isabel dos-Santos-Silva3, John H Hipwell4, Caroline Dickens5, Dorria Salem6, Rasha Kamal7, Mikael Hartman8, Charmaine Pei Ling Lee9, Kee-Seng Chia10, Vahit Ozmen11, Mustafa Erkin Aribal11, Anath Arzee Flugelman12, Martín Lajous13, Ruy Lopez-Riduara14, Megan Rice15, Isabelle Romieu16, Giske Ursin17, Samera Qureshi18, Huiyan Ma19, Eunjung Lee20, Carla H van Gils21, Johanna O P Wanders21, Sudhir Vinayak22, Rose Ndumia22, Steve Allen23, Sarah Vinnicombe24, Sue Moss25, Jong Won Lee26, Jisun Kim26, Ana Pereira27, Maria Luisa Garmendia27, Reza Sirous28, Mehri Sirous28, Beata Peplonska29, Agnieszka Bukowska29, Rulla M Tamimi15, Kimberly Bertrand30, Chisato Nagata31, Ava Kwong32, Celine Vachon33, Christopher Scott33, Beatriz Perez-Gomez34, Marina Pollan34, Gertraud Maskarinec35, Graham Giles36, John Hopper37, Jennifer Stone38, Nadia Rajaram39, Soo-Hwang Teo40, Shivaani Mariapun39, Martin J Yaffe41, Joachim Schüz2, Anna M Chiarelli42, Linda Linton43, Norman F Boyd43.   

Abstract

Mammographic density (MD) is a quantitative trait, measurable in all women, and is among the strongest markers of breast cancer risk. The population-based epidemiology of MD has revealed genetic, lifestyle and societal/environmental determinants, but studies have largely been conducted in women with similar westernized lifestyles living in countries with high breast cancer incidence rates. To benefit from the heterogeneity in risk factors and their combinations worldwide, we created an International Consortium on Mammographic Density (ICMD) to pool individual-level epidemiological and MD data from general population studies worldwide. ICMD aims to characterize determinants of MD more precisely, and to evaluate whether they are consistent across populations worldwide. We included 11755 women, from 27 studies in 22 countries, on whom individual-level risk factor data were pooled and original mammographic images were re-read for ICMD to obtain standardized comparable MD data. In the present article, we present (i) the rationale for this consortium; (ii) characteristics of the studies and women included; and (iii) study methodology to obtain comparable MD data from original re-read films. We also highlight the risk factor heterogeneity captured by such an effort and, thus, the unique insight the pooled study promises to offer through wider exposure ranges, different confounding structures and enhanced power for sub-group analyses.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; International Consortium; Mammographic density

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26724463      PMCID: PMC4738079          DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  53 in total

1.  Methods for assessing and representing mammographic density: an analysis of 4 case-control studies.

Authors:  Christy G Woolcott; Shannon M Conroy; Chisato Nagata; Giske Ursin; Celine M Vachon; Martin J Yaffe; Ian S Pagano; Celia Byrne; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Women Health Outreach Program; a New Experience for all Egyptian Women.

Authors:  Dorria Saleh Salem; Rasha Mohamed Kamal; Maha Hussein Helal; Soha Talaat Hamed; Naglaa Anwar Abdelrazek; Nouran Hussein Said; Iman Adel; Sarah Abdel Maksoud; Sahar Mansour; Hanaa Abdelmeguid Aboulmagd; Ashraf Salah Selim
Journal:  J Egypt Natl Canc Inst       Date:  2008-12

3.  Alcohol intake and mammographic density in postmenopausal Norwegian women.

Authors:  Samera Azeem Qureshi; Elisabeth Couto; Solveig Hofvind; Anna H Wu; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Alarming weight gain in women of a post-transitional country.

Authors:  Maria L Garmendia; Faustino T Alonso; Juliana Kain; Ricardo Uauy; Camila Corvalan
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.022

5.  The South African fertility decline: Evidence from two censuses and a Demographic and Health Survey.

Authors:  Tom A Moultrie; Ian M Timaeus
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2003-11

6.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites and mammographic density in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Kimberly A Bertrand; A Heather Eliassen; Susan E Hankinson; Gretchen L Gierach; Xia Xu; Bernard Rosner; Regina G Ziegler; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.624

8.  Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women.

Authors:  C Nagata; T Matsubara; H Fujita; Y Nagao; C Shibuya; Y Kashiki; H Shimizu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Calorie intake, olive oil consumption and mammographic density among Spanish women.

Authors:  Nicolás García-Arenzana; Eva María Navarrete-Muñoz; Virginia Lope; Pilar Moreo; Carmen Vidal; Soledad Laso-Pablos; Nieves Ascunce; Francisco Casanova-Gómez; Carmen Sánchez-Contador; Carmen Santamariña; Nuria Aragonés; Beatriz Pérez Gómez; Jesús Vioque; Marina Pollán
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods.

Authors:  Amanda Eng; Zoe Gallant; John Shepherd; Valerie McCormack; Jingmei Li; Mitch Dowsett; Sarah Vinnicombe; Steve Allen; Isabel dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  13 in total

1.  Childhood body size and midlife mammographic breast density in foreign-born and U.S.-born women in New York City.

Authors:  Shweta Athilat; Cynthia Joe; Carmen B Rodriguez; Mary Beth Terry; Parisa Tehranifar
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  The association of age at menarche and adult height with mammographic density in the International Consortium of Mammographic Density.

Authors:  Sarah V Ward; Anya Burton; Rulla M Tamimi; Ana Pereira; Maria Luisa Garmendia; Marina Pollan; Norman Boyd; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Gertraud Maskarinec; Beatriz Perez-Gomez; Celine Vachon; Hui Miao; Martín Lajous; Ruy López-Ridaura; Kimberly Bertrand; Ava Kwong; Giske Ursin; Eunjung Lee; Huiyan Ma; Sarah Vinnicombe; Sue Moss; Steve Allen; Rose Ndumia; Sudhir Vinayak; Soo-Hwang Teo; Shivaani Mariapun; Beata Peplonska; Agnieszka Bukowska-Damska; Chisato Nagata; John Hopper; Graham Giles; Vahit Ozmen; Mustafa Erkin Aribal; Joachim Schüz; Carla H Van Gils; Johanna O P Wanders; Reza Sirous; Mehri Sirous; John Hipwell; Jisun Kim; Jong Won Lee; Caroline Dickens; Mikael Hartman; Kee-Seng Chia; Christopher Scott; Anna M Chiarelli; Linda Linton; Anath Arzee Flugelman; Dorria Salem; Rasha Kamal; Valerie McCormack; Jennifer Stone
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 8.408

3.  Alcohol and Tobacco Use in Relation to Mammographic Density in 23,456 Women.

Authors:  Laurel A Habel; Weiva Sieh; Russell B McBride; Kezhen Fei; Joseph H Rothstein; Stacey E Alexeeff; Xiaoyu Song; Lori C Sakoda; Valerie McGuire; Ninah Achacoso; Luana Acton; Rhea Y Liang; Jafi A Lipson; Martin J Yaffe; Daniel L Rubin; Alice S Whittemore
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Breast density in multiethnic women presenting for screening mammography.

Authors:  Bridget A Oppong; Chiranjeev Dash; Suzanne O'Neill; Yinan Li; Kepher Makambi; Edward Pien; Erini Makariou; Tesha Coleman; Lucile L Adams-Campbell
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening in Turkey, a Developing Country: Results from Bahçeşehir Mammography Screening Project.

Authors:  Vahit Özmen; Sibel Ö Gürdal; Neslihan Cabioğlu; Beyza Özcinar; A Nilüfer Özaydın; Arda Kayhan; Erkin Arıbal; Cennet Sahin; Pınar Saip; Oğuzhan Alagöz
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2017-07-01

6.  Mammographic density assessed on paired raw and processed digital images and on paired screen-film and digital images across three mammography systems.

Authors:  Anya Burton; Graham Byrnes; Jennifer Stone; Rulla M Tamimi; John Heine; Celine Vachon; Vahit Ozmen; Ana Pereira; Maria Luisa Garmendia; Christopher Scott; John H Hipwell; Caroline Dickens; Joachim Schüz; Mustafa Erkin Aribal; Kimberly Bertrand; Ava Kwong; Graham G Giles; John Hopper; Beatriz Pérez Gómez; Marina Pollán; Soo-Hwang Teo; Shivaani Mariapun; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib; Martín Lajous; Ruy Lopez-Riduara; Megan Rice; Isabelle Romieu; Anath Arzee Flugelman; Giske Ursin; Samera Qureshi; Huiyan Ma; Eunjung Lee; Reza Sirous; Mehri Sirous; Jong Won Lee; Jisun Kim; Dorria Salem; Rasha Kamal; Mikael Hartman; Hui Miao; Kee-Seng Chia; Chisato Nagata; Sudhir Vinayak; Rose Ndumia; Carla H van Gils; Johanna O P Wanders; Beata Peplonska; Agnieszka Bukowska; Steve Allen; Sarah Vinnicombe; Sue Moss; Anna M Chiarelli; Linda Linton; Gertraud Maskarinec; Martin J Yaffe; Norman F Boyd; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Valerie A McCormack
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  The ErbB2ΔEx16 splice variant is a major oncogenic driver in breast cancer that promotes a pro-metastatic tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  J Turpin; C Ling; E J Crosby; Z C Hartman; A M Simond; L A Chodosh; J P Rennhack; E R Andrechek; J Ozcelik; M Hallett; G B Mills; R D Cardiff; J W Gray; O L Griffith; W J Muller
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide.

Authors:  Anya Burton; Gertraud Maskarinec; Beatriz Perez-Gomez; Celine Vachon; Hui Miao; Martín Lajous; Ruy López-Ridaura; Megan Rice; Ana Pereira; Maria Luisa Garmendia; Rulla M Tamimi; Kimberly Bertrand; Ava Kwong; Giske Ursin; Eunjung Lee; Samera A Qureshi; Huiyan Ma; Sarah Vinnicombe; Sue Moss; Steve Allen; Rose Ndumia; Sudhir Vinayak; Soo-Hwang Teo; Shivaani Mariapun; Farhana Fadzli; Beata Peplonska; Agnieszka Bukowska; Chisato Nagata; Jennifer Stone; John Hopper; Graham Giles; Vahit Ozmen; Mustafa Erkin Aribal; Joachim Schüz; Carla H Van Gils; Johanna O P Wanders; Reza Sirous; Mehri Sirous; John Hipwell; Jisun Kim; Jong Won Lee; Caroline Dickens; Mikael Hartman; Kee-Seng Chia; Christopher Scott; Anna M Chiarelli; Linda Linton; Marina Pollan; Anath Arzee Flugelman; Dorria Salem; Rasha Kamal; Norman Boyd; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Valerie McCormack
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  The transtheoretical model, health belief model, and breast cancer screening among Iranian women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ziba Farajzadegan; Fariba Fathollahi-Dehkordi; Simin Hematti; Reza Sirous; Neda Tavakoli; Reza Rouzbahani
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2-Dimensional Digital Mammography Using Specimens.

Authors:  Jieun Byun; Jee Eun Lee; Eun Suk Cha; Jin Chung; Jeoung Hyun Kim
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2017-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.