INTRODUCTION: The amount of myocardial perfusion required for successful defibrillation after cardiac arrest is unknown. Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) is a surrogate for myocardial perfusion. One limited clinical study identifies a threshold of 15 mmHg required for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Our exploration of threshold and dose models of CPP during the initial bout of CPR indicates higher levels than previously demonstrated are required. CPP required for shock success throughout on-going resuscitation is unknown and other conceptual models of CPP have not been explored. HYPOTHESIS: An array of conceptual models of CPP is associated with and predicts defibrillation success throughout resuscitation. METHODS: Data from 6 porcine cardiac arrest studies were pooled. Mean and area under the curve (AUC) CPP were derived for 30-s epochs. Five conceptual models of CPP were analyzed: threshold, delta, cumulative delta, dose, and cumulative dose. Comparative statistics were performed with one-way ANOVA and two-tailed t-test. Regression models assessed CPP trends and prediction of ROSC. RESULTS: For 316 defibrillation attempts in 124 animals, those resulting in ROSC (n=75) had significantly higher threshold, delta, cumulative delta, dose, and cumulative dose CPP than those without. All conceptual models except delta CPP had significantly different values across successive defibrillation attempts and all five models were significant predictors of ROSC, along with experimental design. CONCLUSIONS: Threshold, delta, cumulative delta, dose, and cumulative dose CPP predict individual defibrillation success throughout resuscitation.
INTRODUCTION: The amount of myocardial perfusion required for successful defibrillation after cardiac arrest is unknown. Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) is a surrogate for myocardial perfusion. One limited clinical study identifies a threshold of 15 mmHg required for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Our exploration of threshold and dose models of CPP during the initial bout of CPR indicates higher levels than previously demonstrated are required. CPP required for shock success throughout on-going resuscitation is unknown and other conceptual models of CPP have not been explored. HYPOTHESIS: An array of conceptual models of CPP is associated with and predicts defibrillation success throughout resuscitation. METHODS: Data from 6 porcine cardiac arrest studies were pooled. Mean and area under the curve (AUC) CPP were derived for 30-s epochs. Five conceptual models of CPP were analyzed: threshold, delta, cumulative delta, dose, and cumulative dose. Comparative statistics were performed with one-way ANOVA and two-tailed t-test. Regression models assessed CPP trends and prediction of ROSC. RESULTS: For 316 defibrillation attempts in 124 animals, those resulting in ROSC (n=75) had significantly higher threshold, delta, cumulative delta, dose, and cumulative dose CPP than those without. All conceptual models except delta CPP had significantly different values across successive defibrillation attempts and all five models were significant predictors of ROSC, along with experimental design. CONCLUSIONS: Threshold, delta, cumulative delta, dose, and cumulative dose CPP predict individual defibrillation success throughout resuscitation.
Authors: I G Stiell; G A Wells; V J DeMaio; D W Spaite; B J Field; D P Munkley; M B Lyver; L G Luinstra; R Ward Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: James J Menegazzi; Jon C Rittenberger; Brian P Suffoletto; Eric S Logue; David D Salcido; Joshua C Reynolds; Lawrence D Sherman Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: J R Michael; A D Guerci; R C Koehler; A Y Shi; J Tsitlik; N Chandra; E Niedermeyer; M C Rogers; R J Traystman; M L Weisfeldt Journal: Circulation Date: 1984-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David D Salcido; Allison C Koller; Cornelia Genbrugge; Ericka L Fink; Robert A Berg; James J Menegazzi Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2021-10-24 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Joseph Varney; Karam R Motawea; Mostafa R Mostafa; Yossef H AbdelQadir; Merna Aboelenein; Omneya A Kandil; Nancy Ibrahim; Hashim T Hashim; Kimberly Murry; Garrett Jackson; Jaffer Shah; Maty Boury; Ahmed K Awad; Priya Patel; Dina M Awad; Samah S Rozan; Nesreen E Talat Journal: Health Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-24
Authors: Sam Joé Brixius; Jan-Steffen Pooth; Jörg Haberstroh; Domagoj Damjanovic; Christian Scherer; Philipp Greiner; Christoph Benk; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Georg Trummer Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Yong Joo Park; Ki Jeong Hong; Sang Do Shin; Tae Yun Kim; Young Sun Ro; Kyoung Jun Song; Hyun Ho Ryu Journal: Clin Exp Emerg Med Date: 2019-09-30