Literature DB >> 16563597

A randomized comparison of manual, mechanical and high-impulse chest compression in a porcine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Amy E Betz1, James J Menegazzi, Eric S Logue, Clifton W Callaway, Henry E Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elevated coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) during CPR is associated with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We compared CPP achieved with three methods of chest compression: manual (MAN), mechanical (MECH) and high-impulse mechanical (HI) in a porcine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). We hypothesized that HI (very rapid acceleration of the down-stroke) would produce greater CPPs than MAN or MECH, and that HI would also produce a higher rate of ROSC.
METHODS: Twenty-eight domestic swine (mean 27.8 kg) were randomly assigned to three methods of chest compression. Animals were instrumented under anesthesia, and VF was induced and untreated for 8 min. After 2 min of CPR, epinephrine (adrenaline) (0. 1 mg/kg), vasopressin (40 U) and propranolol (1.0 mg) were administered. CPR continued for three more minutes, after which up to three rescue shocks were delivered. CPP was determined in an automated fashion by measuring the difference between aortic and right atrial pressures 0.1s prior to the down-stroke of each compression (i.e. end-relaxation). ROSC was defined as a systolic pressure greater than 80 mmHg sustained for at least 1 min. We analyzed CPP and ROSC using repeated measures ANOVA and Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Over the 5 min of CPR, CPP increased more with HI compression than with MAN compression (p=0.017). ROSC was attained in 4/9 MAN, 6/9 MECH and 10/10 HI (HI versus MAN p=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Over the course of CPR, HI compression increased CPP more than MAN compression. HI compression produced a significantly higher rate of ROSC than MAN, but not MECH compression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16563597     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  8 in total

1.  Female sex is not associated with improved rates of ROSC or short term survival following prolonged porcine ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Joshua C Reynolds; Jon C Rittenberger; James J Menegazzi
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Conceptual models of coronary perfusion pressure and their relationship to defibrillation success in a porcine model of prolonged out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Joshua C Reynolds; David D Salcido; James J Menegazzi
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Lipid emulsion combined with epinephrine and vasopressin does not improve survival in a swine model of bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Shawn D Hicks; David D Salcido; Eric S Logue; Brian P Suffoletto; Philip E Empey; Samuel M Poloyac; Donald R Miller; Clifton W Callaway; James J Menegazzi
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Coronary perfusion pressure and return of spontaneous circulation after prolonged cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Joshua C Reynolds; David D Salcido; James J Menegazzi
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.077

5.  Increasing CPR duration prior to first defibrillation does not improve return of spontaneous circulation or survival in a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Jon C Rittenberger; Brian Suffoletto; David Salcido; Eric Logue; James J Menegazzi
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Correlation between coronary perfusion pressure and quantitative ECG waveform measures during resuscitation of prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Joshua C Reynolds; David D Salcido; James J Menegazzi
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  An automated CPR device compared with standard chest compressions for out-of-hospital resuscitation.

Authors:  Paul A Jennings; Linton Harriss; Stephen Bernard; Janet Bray; Tony Walker; Tim Spelman; Karen Smith; Peter Cameron
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2012-06-26

8.  Prognostic Impact of In-Hospital Use of Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Devices Compared with Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Nationwide Population-Based Observational Study in South Korea.

Authors:  Wonhee Kim; Chiwon Ahn; In-Young Kim; Hyun-Young Choi; Jae-Guk Kim; Jihoon Kim; Hyungoo Shin; Shinje Moon; Juncheol Lee; Jongshill Lee; Youngsuk Cho; Yoonje Lee; Dong-Geum Shin
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.