Literature DB >> 34763236

Injury characteristics and hemodynamics associated with guideline-compliant CPR in a pediatric porcine cardiac arrest model.

David D Salcido1, Allison C Koller2, Cornelia Genbrugge3, Ericka L Fink4, Robert A Berg5, James J Menegazzi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for depth of chest compressions in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are based on sparse evidence.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the performance of the two most widely recommended chest compression depth levels for pediatric CPR (1.5 in. and 1/3 the anterior-posterior diameter- APd) in a controlled swine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest.
METHODS: We executed a 2-group, randomized laboratory study with an adaptive design allowing early termination for overwhelming injury or benefit. Forty mixed-breed domestic swine (mean weight = 26 kg) were sedated, anesthetized and paralyzed along with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Asphyxial cardiac arrest was induced with fentanyl overdose. Animals were untreated for 9 min followed by mechanical CPR with a target depth of 1.5 in. or 1/3 the APd. Advanced life support drugs were administered IV after 4 min of basic resuscitation followed by defibrillation at 14 min. The primary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), hemodynamics and CPR-related injury severity.
RESULTS: Enrollment in the 1/3 APd group was stopped early due to overwhelming differences in injury. Twenty-three animals were assigned to the 1.5 in. group and 15 assigned to the 1/3 APd group, per an adaptive group design. The 1/3 APd group had increased frequency of rib fracture (6.7 vs 1.7, p < 0.001) and higher proportions of several anatomic injury markers than the 1.5 in. group, including sternal fracture, hemothorax and blood in the endotracheal tube (p < 0.001). ROSC and hemodynamic measures were similar between groups.
CONCLUSION: In this pediatric model of cardiac arrest, chest compressions to 1/3APd were more harmful without a concurrent benefit for resuscitation outcomes compared to the 1.5 in. compression group.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chest compressions; Injury; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Pediatric; Preclinical

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34763236      PMCID: PMC8982633          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  34 in total

1.  Augmentation of tissue perfusion by a novel compression device increases neurologically intact survival in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Fumiaki Ikeno; Hideaki Kaneda; Yoichiro Hongo; Yuji Sakanoue; Christine Nolasco; Sascha Emami; Jennifer Lyons; Mehrdad Rezaee
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Effect of chest compression on skeletal chest injuries: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hyung Il Kim; Kyoung-Chul Cha; Woo Jin Chung; Young Il Noh; Oh Hyun Kim; Yong Sung Cha; Hyun Kim; Kang Hyun Lee; Hye Sim Kim; Sung Oh Hwang
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.799

3.  No difference in autopsy detected injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with mechanical compressions with the LUCAS device--a pilot study.

Authors:  David Smekal; Jakob Johansson; Tibor Huzevka; Sten Rubertsson
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Ashish R Panchal; Jason A Bartos; José G Cabañas; Michael W Donnino; Ian R Drennan; Karen G Hirsch; Peter J Kudenchuk; Michael C Kurz; Eric J Lavonas; Peter T Morley; Brian J O'Neil; Mary Ann Peberdy; Jon C Rittenberger; Amber J Rodriguez; Kelly N Sawyer; Katherine M Berg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  A systematic review and pooled analysis of CPR-associated cardiovascular and thoracic injuries.

Authors:  Andrew C Miller; Shannon F Rosati; Anthony F Suffredini; David S Schrump
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 6.  Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young.

Authors:  Michael Ackerman; Dianne L Atkins; John K Triedman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Effects of fentanyl, diazepam, and the combination of both on arterial baroreflex and sympathetic nerve activity in intact and baro-denervated dogs.

Authors:  C Taneyama; H Goto; N Kohno; K T Benson; J Sasao; K Arakawa
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs.

Authors:  Qiuming Liao; Trygve Sjöberg; Audrius Paskevicius; Björn Wohlfart; Stig Steen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Children.

Authors:  Natalie Jayaram; Bryan McNally; Fengming Tang; Paul S Chan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Estimation of optimal pediatric chest compression depth by using computed tomography.

Authors:  Soo Young Jin; Seong Beom Oh; Young Oh Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-31
View more
  1 in total

1.  Preclinical Efficacy and Selectivity of Vaccines Targeting Fentanyl, Alfentanil, Sufentanil, and Acetylfentanyl in Rats.

Authors:  Carly Baehr; Christine Robinson; Andrew Kassick; Rajwana Jahan; Valeria Gradinati; Saadyah E Averick; Scott P Runyon; Marco Pravetoni
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-05-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.