Literature DB >> 27613778

Allocation of Resources to Communication of Research Result Summaries.

Julie E Richards1, Emmi Bane2, Stephanie M Fullerton2, Evette J Ludman1, Gail Jarvik2.   

Abstract

Researchers and policymakers recommend communicating summary research results to biobank participants when feasible. To date, however, there have been few explorations of participant preferences for dedicating resources to this activity. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants of a genetic medicine biobank. Participants were interviewed by phone about their motivation for participation, and opinions about the allocation of resources to communicating summary results. De-identified transcripts were used for a directed content analysis. Most biobank participation was altruistic. All participants were not only interested in receiving summary results but also expressed a clear preference for allocating limited funds to conducting additional genetic research. The results suggest that participants have a nuanced view about the allocation of biobank resources to returning summary results, and asking their opinion is a valuable exercise. Researchers may benefit from transparency about research goals and involving biobank participants in decisions about return of summary results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aggregate results; allocation of resources; biobank; data sharing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27613778      PMCID: PMC5334211          DOI: 10.1177/1556264616667126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  20 in total

1.  Informing clinical trial participants about study results.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; Eric P Winer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks.

Authors:  Kieran C O'Doherty; Michael M Burgess; Kelly Edwards; Richard P Gallagher; Alice K Hawkins; Jane Kaye; Veronica McCaffrey; David E Winickoff
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Study newsletters, community and ethics advisory boards, and focus group discussions provide ongoing feedback for a large biobank.

Authors:  Catherine A McCarty; Ann Garber; Jonathan C Reeser; Norman C Fost
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants.

Authors:  F A Miller; R Christensen; M Giacomini; J S Robert
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.

Authors:  K E Ormond; A L Cirino; I B Helenowski; R L Chisholm; W A Wolf
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Return of research results from genomic biobanks: cost matters.

Authors:  Marianna J Bledsoe; Ellen Wright Clayton; Amy L McGuire; William E Grizzle; P Pearl O'Rourke; Nikolajs Zeps
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Brittney N Crock; Brian Van Ness; Frances Lawrenz; Jeffrey P Kahn; Laura M Beskow; Mildred K Cho; Michael F Christman; Robert C Green; Ralph Hall; Judy Illes; Moira Keane; Bartha M Knoppers; Barbara A Koenig; Isaac S Kohane; Bonnie Leroy; Karen J Maschke; William McGeveran; Pilar Ossorio; Lisa S Parker; Gloria M Petersen; Henry S Richardson; Joan A Scott; Sharon F Terry; Benjamin S Wilfond; Wendy A Wolf
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Wylie Burke; Stephanie M Fullerton; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research.

Authors:  Colin M E Halverson; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Great expectations: views of genetic research participants regarding current and future genetic studies.

Authors:  Gail Henderson; Joanne Garrett; Jada Bussey-Jones; Mairead Eastin Moloney; Connie Blumenthal; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  2 in total

1.  Returning Results: Let's Be Honest!

Authors:  Bernice S Elger; Eva De Clercq
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-02-24

2.  Stakeholder Perspectives on Returning Nonactionable Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) Genetic Results to African American Research Participants.

Authors:  Kathleen M West; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Erika Blacksher; Stephanie M Fullerton; Ebele M Umeukeje; Bessie Young; Wylie Burke
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 1.978

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.