T A Iseli1, M J Lin, A Tsui, A Guiney, D Wiesenfeld, C E Iseli. 1. Division of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. iselient@hotmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, a 1-cm surgical resection margin is used for early oral tongue tumours. METHODS: All tumour stage one (n = 65) and stage two (n = 13) oral tongue cancers treated between January 1999 and January 2009 were followed for a median of 38 months (minimum 12 months). The sites of close and involved margins were histologically reviewed. RESULTS: Involved and close margins occurred in 14 and 55 per cent of cases, respectively. The number of involved vs clear or close margins was equivalent in tumour stage one (90 vs 82 per cent), node-negative (100 vs 84 per cent) and perineural or lymphovascular invasion (20 vs 21 per cent) cases. Close or involved margins were similarly likely to be posterior (59 per cent) as anterior (41 per cent, p = 0.22), lateral (57 per cent) as medial (43 per cent, p = 0.34), and mucosal (59 per cent) as deep (41 per cent, p = 0.22). Local recurrence occurred in 28 per cent of cases at a median of 12 months, and was more likely in cases with involved (50 per cent) than clear or close margins (25 per cent, p = 0.10). Disease-free survival was worse in involved margins cases (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Involved margins are common in early tongue tumours, and are associated with increased local recurrence and worse survival. Close or involved margins occur in all directions and all tumour types. A wider margin may be justified.
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, a 1-cm surgical resection margin is used for early oral tongue tumours. METHODS: All tumour stage one (n = 65) and stage two (n = 13) oral tongue cancers treated between January 1999 and January 2009 were followed for a median of 38 months (minimum 12 months). The sites of close and involved margins were histologically reviewed. RESULTS: Involved and close margins occurred in 14 and 55 per cent of cases, respectively. The number of involved vs clear or close margins was equivalent in tumour stage one (90 vs 82 per cent), node-negative (100 vs 84 per cent) and perineural or lymphovascular invasion (20 vs 21 per cent) cases. Close or involved margins were similarly likely to be posterior (59 per cent) as anterior (41 per cent, p = 0.22), lateral (57 per cent) as medial (43 per cent, p = 0.34), and mucosal (59 per cent) as deep (41 per cent, p = 0.22). Local recurrence occurred in 28 per cent of cases at a median of 12 months, and was more likely in cases with involved (50 per cent) than clear or close margins (25 per cent, p = 0.10). Disease-free survival was worse in involved margins cases (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Involved margins are common in early tongue tumours, and are associated with increased local recurrence and worse survival. Close or involved margins occur in all directions and all tumour types. A wider margin may be justified.
Authors: Florian Alexander Kerker; Werner Adler; Kathrin Brunner; Tobias Moest; Matthias C Wurm; Emeka Nkenke; Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam; Cornelius von Wilmowsky Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Fred M Baik; Stacey Hansen; Sue E Knoblaugh; Disha Sahetya; Ryan M Mitchell; Chang Xu; James M Olson; Julia Parrish-Novak; Eduardo Méndez Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Namita Sinha; Matthew H Rigby; Michael L McNeil; S Mark Taylor; Jonathan Rb Trites; Robert D Hart; Martin J Bullock Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Parul Sinha; Mitra Mehrad; Rebecca D Chernock; James S Lewis; Samir K El-Mofty; Ningying Wu; Brian Nussenbaum; Bruce H Haughey Journal: Head Neck Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: P B A A van Driel; J R van der Vorst; F P R Verbeek; S Oliveira; T J A Snoeks; S Keereweer; B Chan; M C Boonstra; J V Frangioni; P M P van Bergen en Henegouwen; A L Vahrmeijer; C W G M Lowik Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Martin C Boonstra; Jai Prakash; Cornelis J H Van De Velde; Wilma E Mesker; Peter J K Kuppen; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Cornelis F M Sier Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 6.244