Fred M Baik1, Stacey Hansen2, Sue E Knoblaugh3, Disha Sahetya2, Ryan M Mitchell1, Chang Xu4, James M Olson4, Julia Parrish-Novak2, Eduardo Méndez5. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle. 2. Blaze Bioscience Inc, Seattle, Washington. 3. Department of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus. 4. Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. 5. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle4Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Surgical cure of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains hampered by inadequately resected tumors and poor recognition of lesions with malignant potential. BLZ-100 is a chlorotoxin-based, tumor-targeting agent that has not yet been studied in HNSCC. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate BLZ-100 uptake in models of HNSCC and oral dysplasia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was an observational study (including sensitivity and specificity analysis) of BLZ-100 uptake in an orthotopic xenograft mouse model of HNSCC and a carcinogen-induced dysplasia model of hamster cheek pouches. INTERVENTIONS: Various HNSCC xenografts were established in the tongues of NOD-scid IL2Rgammanull (NSG) mice. BLZ-100 was intravenously injected and fluorescence uptake was measured. To induce dysplasia, the carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) was applied to the cheek pouch of Golden Syrian hamsters for 9 to16 weeks. BLZ-100 was subcutaneously injected, and fluorescence uptake was measured. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The signal-to-background ratio (SBR) of BLZ-100 was measured in tumor xenografts. To calculate the sensitivity and specificity of BLZ-100 uptake, a digital grid was placed over tissue sections and correlative histologic sections to discretely measure fluorescence intensity and presence of tumor; a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was then plotted. In the hamster dysplasia model, cheeks were graded according to dysplasia severity. The SBR of BLZ-100 was compared among dysplasia grades. RESULTS: In HNSCC xenografts, BLZ-100 demonstrated a mean (SD) SBR of 2.51 (0.47). The ROC curve demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89; an SBR of 2.50 corresponded to 92% sensitivity and 74% specificity. When this analysis was focused on the tumor and nontumor interface, the AUC increased to 0.97; an SBR of 2.50 corresponded to 95% sensitivity and 91% specificity. DMBA treatment of hamster cheek pouches generated lesions representing all grades of dysplasia. The SBR of high-grade dysplasia was significantly greater than that of mild-to-moderate dysplasia (2.31 [0.71] vs 1.51 [0.34], P = .006). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: BLZ-100 is a sensitive and specific marker of HNSCC and can distinguish high-risk from low-risk dysplasia. BLZ-100 has the potential to serve as an intraoperative guide for tumor margin excision and identification of premalignant lesions.
IMPORTANCE: Surgical cure of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains hampered by inadequately resected tumors and poor recognition of lesions with malignant potential. BLZ-100 is a chlorotoxin-based, tumor-targeting agent that has not yet been studied in HNSCC. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate BLZ-100 uptake in models of HNSCC and oral dysplasia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was an observational study (including sensitivity and specificity analysis) of BLZ-100 uptake in an orthotopic xenograft mouse model of HNSCC and a carcinogen-induced dysplasia model of hamster cheek pouches. INTERVENTIONS: Various HNSCC xenografts were established in the tongues of NOD-scid IL2Rgammanull (NSG) mice. BLZ-100 was intravenously injected and fluorescence uptake was measured. To induce dysplasia, the carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) was applied to the cheek pouch of Golden Syrian hamsters for 9 to16 weeks. BLZ-100 was subcutaneously injected, and fluorescence uptake was measured. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The signal-to-background ratio (SBR) of BLZ-100 was measured in tumor xenografts. To calculate the sensitivity and specificity of BLZ-100 uptake, a digital grid was placed over tissue sections and correlative histologic sections to discretely measure fluorescence intensity and presence of tumor; a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was then plotted. In the hamster dysplasia model, cheeks were graded according to dysplasia severity. The SBR of BLZ-100 was compared among dysplasia grades. RESULTS: In HNSCC xenografts, BLZ-100 demonstrated a mean (SD) SBR of 2.51 (0.47). The ROC curve demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89; an SBR of 2.50 corresponded to 92% sensitivity and 74% specificity. When this analysis was focused on the tumor and nontumor interface, the AUC increased to 0.97; an SBR of 2.50 corresponded to 95% sensitivity and 91% specificity. DMBA treatment of hamster cheek pouches generated lesions representing all grades of dysplasia. The SBR of high-grade dysplasia was significantly greater than that of mild-to-moderate dysplasia (2.31 [0.71] vs 1.51 [0.34], P = .006). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: BLZ-100 is a sensitive and specific marker of HNSCC and can distinguish high-risk from low-risk dysplasia. BLZ-100 has the potential to serve as an intraoperative guide for tumor margin excision and identification of premalignant lesions.
Authors: Pramod V Butte; Adam Mamelak; Julia Parrish-Novak; Doniel Drazin; Faris Shweikeh; Pallavi R Gangalum; Alexandra Chesnokova; Julia Y Ljubimova; Keith Black Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Jacques Bernier; Jay S Cooper; T F Pajak; M van Glabbeke; J Bourhis; Arlene Forastiere; Esat Mahmut Ozsahin; John R Jacobs; J Jassem; Kie-Kian Ang; J L Lefèbvre Journal: Head Neck Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Kamala Kesavan; Judson Ratliff; Eric W Johnson; William Dahlberg; John M Asara; Preeti Misra; John V Frangioni; Douglas B Jacoby Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Richard W Nason; Abdulaziz Binahmed; Kumar A Pathak; Ahmed A Abdoh; George K B Sándor Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2009-01-25
Authors: Sharon J Miller; Bishnu P Joshi; Ying Feng; Adam Gaustad; Eric R Fearon; Thomas D Wang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Stijn Keereweer; Jeroen D F Kerrebijn; Pieter B A A van Driel; Bangwen Xie; Eric L Kaijzel; Thomas J A Snoeks; Ivo Que; Merlijn Hutteman; Joost R van der Vorst; J Sven D Mieog; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Clemens W G M Löwik Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Julia Parrish-Novak; Kelly Byrnes-Blake; Narine Lalayeva; Stefanie Burleson; Janean Fidel; Rhonda Gilmore; Pamela Gayheart-Walsten; Gregory A Bricker; William J Crumb; K S Tarlo; Stacey Hansen; Valorie Wiss; Errol Malta; William S Dernell; James M Olson; Dennis M Miller Journal: Int J Toxicol Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 2.032
Authors: Ray R Zhang; Alexandra B Schroeder; Joseph J Grudzinski; Eben L Rosenthal; Jason M Warram; Anatoly N Pinchuk; Kevin W Eliceiri; John S Kuo; Jamey P Weichert Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Nicholas A Vitanza; Matt C Biery; Carrie Myers; Eric Ferguson; Ye Zheng; Emily J Girard; Justyna M Przystal; Giulia Park; Alyssa Noll; Fiona Pakiam; Conrad A Winter; Shelli M Morris; Jay Sarthy; Bonnie L Cole; Sarah E S Leary; Courtney Crane; Nicole A P Lieberman; Sabine Mueller; Javad Nazarian; Raphael Gottardo; Mi-Youn Brusniak; Andrew J Mhyre; James M Olson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Marcel Miampamba; Junjie Liu; Alec Harootunian; Andrew J Gale; Stephen Baird; Steven L Chen; Quyen T Nguyen; Roger Y Tsien; Jesús E González Journal: Theranostics Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Thinzar M Lwin; Michael A Turner; Siamak Amirfakhri; Hiroto Nishino; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: Cells Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 6.600