Literature DB >> 22252221

A three-dimensional model of an ultrasound contrast agent gas bubble and its mechanical effects on microvessels.

N Hosseinkhah1, K Hynynen.   

Abstract

Ultrasound contrast agents inside a microvessel, when driven by ultrasound, oscillate and induce mechanical stresses on the vessel wall. These mechanical stresses can produce beneficial therapeutic effects but also induce vessel rupture if the stresses are too high. Therefore, it is important to use sufficiently low pressure amplitudes to avoid rupturing the vessels while still inducing the desired therapeutic effects. In this work, we developed a comprehensive three-dimensional model of a confined microbubble inside a vessel while considering the bubble shell properties, blood viscosity, vessel wall curvature and the mechanical properties of the vessel wall. Two bubble models with the assumption of a spherical symmetric bubble and a simple asymmetrical bubble were simulated. This work was validated with previous experimental results and enabled us to evaluate the microbubbles' behaviour and the resulting mechanical stresses induced on the vessel walls. In this study, the fluid shear and circumferential stresses were evaluated as indicators of the mechanical stresses. The effects of acoustical parameters, vessel viscoelasticity and rigidity, vessel/bubble size and off-centre bubbles on bubble behaviour and stresses on the vessel were investigated. The fluid shear and circumferential stresses acting on the vessel varied with time and location. As the frequency changed, the microbubble oscillated with the highest amplitude at its resonance frequency which was different from the resonance frequency of an unbound bubble. The bubble resonance frequency increased as the rigidity of a flexible vessel increased. The fluid shear and circumferential stresses peaked at frequencies above the bubble's resonance frequency. The more rigid the vessels were, the more damped the bubble oscillations. The synergistic effect of acoustic frequency and vessel elasticity had also been investigated since the circumferential stress showed either an increasing trend or a decreasing one versus the vessel rigidity at different acoustic frequencies. When the acoustic pressure was increased from 52 to 680 kPa, the maximum bubble radius increase by 2.5 fold, and the maximum shear and circumferential stress increased by 15.7 and 18.3 fold, respectively. The shear stress was largest when the acoustic frequency was higher (3.25 MHz) and the ratio of the vessel radius to the bubble radius was lower. The circumferential stress was largest when the bubble wall was closer to the vessel wall. An oscillating off-centre bubble forms a mushroom shape with the most damping on the points closest to the vessel wall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22252221      PMCID: PMC3367455          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/3/785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  33 in total

1.  Focal disruption of the blood-brain barrier due to 260-kHz ultrasound bursts: a method for molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Kullervo Hynynen; Nathan McDannold; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Scott Raymond; Ralph Weissleder; Ferenc A Jolesz; Nickolai Sheikov
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sander M van der Meer; Benjamin Dollet; Marco M Voormolen; Chien T Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue.

Authors:  Elena S Di Martino; Ajay Bohra; Jonathan P Vande Geest; Navyash Gupta; Michel S Makaroun; David A Vorp
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Direct in vivo visualization of intravascular destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and its local effects on tissue.

Authors:  D M Skyba; R J Price; A Z Linka; T C Skalak; S Kaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-07-28       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Wayne Kreider; Andrew A Brayman; Michael R Bailey; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Acoustic response of compliable microvessels containing ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Endothelial microtubular bodies in human brain capillaries and venules.

Authors:  H Herrlinger; A P Anzil; K Blinzinger; D Kronski
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Direct numerical simulations of micro-bubble expansion in gas embolotherapy.

Authors:  Tao Ye; Joseph L Bull
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Temperature change near microbubbles within a capillary network during focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Alexander R Klotz; Liis Lindvere; Bojana Stefanovic; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Hemolysis near an ultrasonically pulsating gas bubble.

Authors:  J A Rooney
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  19 in total

1.  Optimization of low-frequency low-intensity ultrasound-mediated microvessel disruption on prostate cancer xenografts in nude mice using an orthogonal experimental design.

Authors:  Y U Yang; Wenkun Bai; Yini Chen; Yanduan Lin; Bing Hu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Mechanisms of microbubble-vessel interactions and induced stresses: a numerical study.

Authors:  N Hosseinkhah; H Chen; T J Matula; P N Burns; K Hynynen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Drug delivery to the brain by focused ultrasound induced blood-brain barrier disruption: quantitative evaluation of enhanced permeability of cerebral vasculature using two-photon microscopy.

Authors:  Tam Nhan; Alison Burgess; Eunice E Cho; Bojana Stefanovic; Lothar Lilge; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 4.  Drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier using focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Alison Burgess; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 5.  Evaluating the safety profile of focused ultrasound and microbubble-mediated treatments to increase blood-brain barrier permeability.

Authors:  Dallan McMahon; Charissa Poon; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 6.  Focused ultrasound-mediated drug delivery through the blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  Alison Burgess; Kairavi Shah; Olivia Hough; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 7.  Noninvasive and targeted drug delivery to the brain using focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Alison Burgess; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 8.  Biomolecular Ultrasound and Sonogenetics.

Authors:  David Maresca; Anupama Lakshmanan; Mohamad Abedi; Avinoam Bar-Zion; Arash Farhadi; George J Lu; Jerzy O Szablowski; Di Wu; Sangjin Yoo; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 11.059

Review 9.  Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Muna Aryal; Costas D Arvanitis; Phillip M Alexander; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 15.470

10.  Targeted gene transfer to the brain via the delivery of brain-penetrating DNA nanoparticles with focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Brian P Mead; Panagiotis Mastorakos; Jung Soo Suk; Alexander L Klibanov; Justin Hanes; Richard J Price
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.