Literature DB >> 22250839

The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.

Raúl González-García1, Florencio Monje.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to objectively assess the reliability of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a tool to pre-operatively determine radiographic bone density (RBD) by the density values provided by the system, analyzing its relationship with histomorphometric bone density expressed as bone volumetric fraction (BV/TV) assessed by micro-CT of bone biopsies at the site of insertion of dental implants in the maxillary bones.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-nine bone biopsies of the maxillary bones at the sites of 39 dental implants from 31 edentulous healthy patients were analyzed. The NobelGuide™ software was used for implant planning, which also allowed fabrication of individual stereolithographic surgical guides. The analysis of CBCT images allowed pre-operative determination of mean density values of implant recipient sites along the major axis of the planned implants (axial RBD). Stereolithographic surgical guides were used to guide implant insertion and also to extract cylindrical bone biopsies from the core of the exact implant site. Further analysis of several osseous micro-structural variables including BV/TV was performed by micro-CT of the extracted bone biopsies.
RESULTS: Mean axial RBD was 478 ± 212 (range: 144-953). A statistically significant difference (P = 0.02) was observed among density values of the cortical bone of the upper maxilla and mandible. A high positive Pearson's correlation coefficient (r = 0.858, P < 0.001) was observed between RBD and BV/TV, with the regression equations: (1) Axial RBD = -19.974 + 10.238·BV/TV; (2) BV/TV = 14.258 + 0.72·Axial RBD. RBD was also positively correlated with the trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and trabecular number (Tb.N), but negatively correlated with trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), structural model index, and inverse connectivity (Tb.Pf). Density values upper than 450 were associated with BV/TV upper than 50%, mean Tb.Th upper than 0.2 mm, mean Tb.Sp lower than 0.3 mm, and mean Tb.N upper than 2.
CONCLUSION: RBD assessed by CBCT has a strong positive correlation with BV/TV assessed by micro-CT at the site of dental implants in the maxillary bones. Pre-operative estimation of density values by CBCT is a reliable tool to objectively determine bone density.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; bone volumetric fraction; cone-beam CT; density values; dental implants; histomorphometry; micro-CT; radiographic bone density

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22250839     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02390.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  31 in total

1.  The effect of scan parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructural measurements of the human mandible.

Authors:  N Ibrahim; A Parsa; B Hassan; P van der Stelt; I H A Aartman; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

Authors:  R Pauwels; R Jacobs; S R Singer; M Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Evaluation of trabecular pattern of mandible using fractal dimension, bone area fraction, and gray scale value: comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Guldane Magat; Sevgi Ozcan Sener
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 4.  Diagnostic imaging of trabecular bone microstructure for oral implants: a literature review.

Authors:  N Ibrahim; A Parsa; B Hassan; P van der Stelt; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Trabecular bone histomorphometric measurements and contrast-to-noise ratio in CBCT.

Authors:  E Klintström; O Smedby; B Klintström; T B Brismar; R Moreno
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Derived Alveolar Bone Density Between Subjects with and without Aggressive Periodontitis.

Authors:  Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Eman Y Elfirt; Manea M Al-Ahmari; Ibrahim A Yamany; Maher A Alabdulkarim; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

7.  Effects of orthodontic treatment on human alveolar bone density distribution.

Authors:  Hechang Huang; Michael Richards; Tamer Bedair; Henry W Fields; J Martin Palomo; William M Johnston; Do-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Accuracy of biomarkers obtained from cone beam computed tomography in assessing the internal trabecular structure of the mandibular condyle.

Authors:  Fouad H Ebrahim; Antonio C O Ruellas; Beatriz Paniagua; Erika Benavides; Karl Jepsen; Larry Wolford; Joao Roberto Goncalves; Lucia H S Cevidanes
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2017-08-24

9.  Use of fractal analysis in dental images: a systematic review.

Authors:  Camila Nao Kato; Sâmila G Barra; Núbia Pk Tavares; Tânia Mp Amaral; Cláudia B Brasileiro; Ricardo A Mesquita; Lucas G Abreu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Can gray values be converted to Hounsfield units? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marjorie Eguren; Anderson Holguin; Karla Diaz; Jose Vidalon; Carlos Linan; Camila Pacheco-Pereira; Manuel Oscar Lagravere Vich
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.