PURPOSE: To compare local functional measures, the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and visual field sensitivity, with a local structural measure, spectral domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT), of receptor damage in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS: MfERGs, visual fields, and SD-OCT scans were obtained from 10 patients with RP, ranging in age from 23 to 59 years. Average amplitudes, average linear sensitivities, and average layer thicknesses were measured from within the central 3° and from three concentric annuli located between 3° and 8°, 8° and 15°, and 15° and 24°. A computer program aided manual segmentation and calculated OCT thickness in the scans. RESULTS: Within each patient with RP, mfERG amplitude for each circle/annulus was highly correlated with corresponding layer thicknesses in the outer retina (r = 0.88 to 0.99), but not at all correlated with thickness of the inner nuclear layer or total retina. Across all ring eccentricities, relative mfERG amplitude and relative visual field sensitivity were correlated with relative SD-OCT outer retinal thickness. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RP, preserved cone photoreceptor function measured by mfERG amplitude and visual field sensitivity correlate well with the remaining thickness of the photoreceptor layer. All three measures show comparable relative loss beyond 3° eccentricity. In the fovea, SD-OCT outer retina thickness showed less relative loss than either mfERG or visual field sensitivity.
PURPOSE: To compare local functional measures, the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and visual field sensitivity, with a local structural measure, spectral domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT), of receptor damage in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS: MfERGs, visual fields, and SD-OCT scans were obtained from 10 patients with RP, ranging in age from 23 to 59 years. Average amplitudes, average linear sensitivities, and average layer thicknesses were measured from within the central 3° and from three concentric annuli located between 3° and 8°, 8° and 15°, and 15° and 24°. A computer program aided manual segmentation and calculated OCT thickness in the scans. RESULTS: Within each patient with RP, mfERG amplitude for each circle/annulus was highly correlated with corresponding layer thicknesses in the outer retina (r = 0.88 to 0.99), but not at all correlated with thickness of the inner nuclear layer or total retina. Across all ring eccentricities, relative mfERG amplitude and relative visual field sensitivity were correlated with relative SD-OCT outer retinal thickness. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RP, preserved cone photoreceptor function measured by mfERG amplitude and visual field sensitivity correlate well with the remaining thickness of the photoreceptor layer. All three measures show comparable relative loss beyond 3° eccentricity. In the fovea, SD-OCT outer retina thickness showed less relative loss than either mfERG or visual field sensitivity.
Authors: Donald C Hood; Margot A Lazow; Kirsten G Locke; Vivienne C Greenstein; David G Birch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Christine A Curcio; Jeffrey D Messinger; Kenneth R Sloan; Arnab Mitra; Gerald McGwin; Richard F Spaide Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-06-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Nalini V Rangaswamy; Hemaxi M Patel; Kirsten G Locke; Donald C Hood; David G Birch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: David G Birch; Patrick D Williams; David Callanan; Robert Wang; Kirsten G Locke; Donald C Hood Journal: Retina Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Donald C Hood; Christine E Lin; Margot A Lazow; Kirsten G Locke; Xian Zhang; David G Birch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-11-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Samuel G Jacobson; Alejandro J Roman; Tomas S Aleman; Alexander Sumaroka; Waldo Herrera; Elizabeth A M Windsor; Lori A Atkinson; Sharon B Schwartz; Janet D Steinberg; Artur V Cideciyan Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Susan F Murray; Ali Jazayeri; Michael T Matthes; Douglas Yasumura; Haidong Yang; Raechel Peralta; Andy Watt; Sue Freier; Gene Hung; Peter S Adamson; Shuling Guo; Brett P Monia; Matthew M LaVail; Michael L McCaleb Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Rossiana I Bojinova; Daniel F Schorderet; Christophe Valmaggia; Cengiz Türksever; Andreas Schoetzau; Margarita G Todorova Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: David G Birch; Kirsten G Locke; Joost Felius; Martin Klein; Dianna K H Wheaton; Dennis R Hoffman; Donald C Hood Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-12-31 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jason Charish; Alireza P Shabanzadeh; Danian Chen; Patrick Mehlen; Santhosh Sethuramanujam; Hidekiyo Harada; Vera L Bonilha; Gautam Awatramani; Rod Bremner; Philippe P Monnier Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Susan E Yanni; Jingyun Wang; Christina S Cheng; Kelly I Locke; Yuquan Wen; David G Birch; Eileen E Birch Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2012-11-03 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Amir H Hariri; Hong Yang Zhang; Alexander Ho; Peter Francis; Richard G Weleber; David G Birch; Frederick L Ferris; SriniVas R Sadda Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389