PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between visual field sensitivity and photoreceptor layer thickness in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS: Static automated perimetry (central 30-2 threshold program with spot size III; Humphrey Field Analyzer; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA) and frequency domain optical coherence tomography (Fd-OCT) scans (Spectralis HRA+OCT; Heidelberg Engineering, Vista, CA) were obtained from 10 age-matched normal control subjects and 20 patients with RP who had retained good central vision (better than 20/32). The outer segment (OS+) thickness (the distance between retinal pigment epithelium [RPE])/Bruch's membrane [BM] to the photoreceptor inner-outer segment junction), outer nuclear layer (ONL), and total retinal thickness were measured at locations corresponding to visual field test loci up to 21 degrees eccentricity. RESULTS: The average OS+ thickness in the control eyes was 63.1 +/- 5.2 microm, varying from approximately 69 microm in the foveal center to 56 microm at 21 degrees eccentricity. In patients with RP, OS+ thickness was below normal limits outside the fovea, and thickness decreased with loss in local field sensitivity, reaching an asymptotic value of 21.5 microm at approximately -10 dB. The ONL thickness also decreased with local field sensitivity loss. Although relative OS thickness was linearly related to visual field loss at all locations examined, a slightly better correlation was found between the product of OS and ONL thickness and visual field loss. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RP with good foveal sensitivity, the OS thickness and the product of OS thickness and ONL thickness (assumed to represent the number of photoreceptors) decreases linearly with loss of local field sensitivity. In general, in regions where perimetric sensitivity loss is -10 dB or worse, the OS+ thickness approaches the thickness of the RPE/BM complex.
PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between visual field sensitivity and photoreceptor layer thickness in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS: Static automated perimetry (central 30-2 threshold program with spot size III; Humphrey Field Analyzer; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA) and frequency domain optical coherence tomography (Fd-OCT) scans (Spectralis HRA+OCT; Heidelberg Engineering, Vista, CA) were obtained from 10 age-matched normal control subjects and 20 patients with RP who had retained good central vision (better than 20/32). The outer segment (OS+) thickness (the distance between retinal pigment epithelium [RPE])/Bruch's membrane [BM] to the photoreceptor inner-outer segment junction), outer nuclear layer (ONL), and total retinal thickness were measured at locations corresponding to visual field test loci up to 21 degrees eccentricity. RESULTS: The average OS+ thickness in the control eyes was 63.1 +/- 5.2 microm, varying from approximately 69 microm in the foveal center to 56 microm at 21 degrees eccentricity. In patients with RP, OS+ thickness was below normal limits outside the fovea, and thickness decreased with loss in local field sensitivity, reaching an asymptotic value of 21.5 microm at approximately -10 dB. The ONL thickness also decreased with local field sensitivity loss. Although relative OS thickness was linearly related to visual field loss at all locations examined, a slightly better correlation was found between the product of OS and ONL thickness and visual field loss. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RP with good foveal sensitivity, the OS thickness and the product of OS thickness and ONL thickness (assumed to represent the number of photoreceptors) decreases linearly with loss of local field sensitivity. In general, in regions where perimetric sensitivity loss is -10 dB or worse, the OS+ thickness approaches the thickness of the RPE/BM complex.
Authors: Michael A Sandberg; Robert J Brockhurst; Alexander R Gaudio; Eliot L Berson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: M Dominik Fischer; Johannes C Fleischhauer; Mark C Gillies; Florian K Sutter; Horst Helbig; Daniel Barthelmes Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-04-25 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Samuel G Jacobson; Tomas S Aleman; Artur V Cideciyan; Alexander Sumaroka; Sharon B Schwartz; Elizabeth A M Windsor; Elias I Traboulsi; Elise Heon; Steven J Pittler; Ann H Milam; Albert M Maguire; Krzysztof Palczewski; Edwin M Stone; Jean Bennett Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-04-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Andre J Witkin; Tony H Ko; James G Fujimoto; Annie Chan; Wolfgang Drexler; Joel S Schuman; Elias Reichel; Jay S Duker Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2006-09-01 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Samuel G Jacobson; Artur V Cideciyan; Tomas S Aleman; Alexander Sumaroka; Alejandro J Roman; Leigh M Gardner; Haydn M Prosser; Monalisa Mishra; N Torben Bech-Hansen; Waldo Herrera; Sharon B Schwartz; Xue-Zhong Liu; William J Kimberling; Karen P Steel; David S Williams Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2008-05-07 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Donald C Hood; Margot A Lazow; Kirsten G Locke; Vivienne C Greenstein; David G Birch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Vivienne C Greenstein; Tobias Duncker; Karen Holopigian; Ronald E Carr; Jonathan P Greenberg; Stephen H Tsang; Donald C Hood Journal: Retina Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Ferenc B Sallo; Tunde Peto; Catherine Egan; Ute E K Wolf-Schnurrbusch; Traci E Clemons; Mark C Gillies; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Gary S Rubin; Emily Y Chew; Alan C Bird Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Wei Chieh Huang; Artur V Cideciyan; Alejandro J Roman; Alexander Sumaroka; Rebecca Sheplock; Sharon B Schwartz; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 4.799