PURPOSE: The purpose was to compare T(2)* relaxation times and proton density fat-fraction (PDFF) values between brown (BAT) and white (WAT) adipose tissue in lean and ob/ob mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of lean male mice (n=6) and two groups of ob/ob male mice placed on similar 4-week (n=6) and 8-week (n=8) ad libitum diets were utilized. The animals were imaged at 3 T using a T(2)*-corrected chemical-shift-based water-fat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method that provides simultaneous estimation of T(2)* and PDFF on a voxel-wise basis. Regions of interest were drawn within the interscapular BAT and gonadal WAT depots on co-registered T(2)* and PDFF maps. Measurements were assessed using analysis of variance, Bonferroni-adjusted t test for multigroup comparisons and the Tukey post hoc test. RESULTS: Significant differences (P<.01) in BAT T(2)* and PDFF were observed between the lean and ob/ob groups. The ob/ob animals exhibited longer BAT T(2)* and greater PDFF than lean animals. However, only BAT PDFF was significantly different (P<.01) between the two ob/ob groups. When comparing BAT to WAT within each group, T(2)* and PDFF values were consistently lower in BAT than WAT (P<.01). The difference was most prominent in the lean animals. In both ob/ob groups, BAT exhibited very WAT-like appearances and properties on the MRI images. CONCLUSION: T(2)* and PDFF are lower in BAT than WAT. This is likely due to variations in tissue composition. The values were consistently lower in lean mice than in ob/ob mice, suggestive of the former's greater demand for BAT thermogenesis and reflective of leptin hormone deficiencies and diminished BAT metabolic activity in the latter. Copyright Â
PURPOSE: The purpose was to compare T(2)* relaxation times and proton density fat-fraction (PDFF) values between brown (BAT) and white (WAT) adipose tissue in lean and ob/ob mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of lean male mice (n=6) and two groups of ob/ob male mice placed on similar 4-week (n=6) and 8-week (n=8) ad libitum diets were utilized. The animals were imaged at 3 T using a T(2)*-corrected chemical-shift-based water-fat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method that provides simultaneous estimation of T(2)* and PDFF on a voxel-wise basis. Regions of interest were drawn within the interscapular BAT and gonadal WAT depots on co-registered T(2)* and PDFF maps. Measurements were assessed using analysis of variance, Bonferroni-adjusted t test for multigroup comparisons and the Tukey post hoc test. RESULTS: Significant differences (P<.01) in BAT T(2)* and PDFF were observed between the lean and ob/ob groups. The ob/ob animals exhibited longer BAT T(2)* and greater PDFF than lean animals. However, only BAT PDFF was significantly different (P<.01) between the two ob/ob groups. When comparing BAT to WAT within each group, T(2)* and PDFF values were consistently lower in BAT than WAT (P<.01). The difference was most prominent in the lean animals. In both ob/ob groups, BAT exhibited very WAT-like appearances and properties on the MRI images. CONCLUSION: T(2)* and PDFF are lower in BAT than WAT. This is likely due to variations in tissue composition. The values were consistently lower in lean mice than in ob/ob mice, suggestive of the former's greater demand for BAT thermogenesis and reflective of leptin hormone deficiencies and diminished BAT metabolic activity in the latter. Copyright Â
Authors: Jie Deng; Lisa M Neff; Nicholas C Rubert; Bin Zhang; Richard M Shore; Jonathan D Samet; Paige C Nelson; Lewis Landsberg Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Aliya Gifford; Theodore F Towse; Ronald C Walker; Malcolm J Avison; E Brian Welch Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Xiaoke Wang; Timothy J Colgan; Louis A Hinshaw; Nathan T Roberts; Leah C Henze Bancroft; Gavin Hamilton; Diego Hernando; Scott B Reeder Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Houchun H Hu; Larry Yin; Patricia C Aggabao; Thomas G Perkins; Jonathan M Chia; Vicente Gilsanz Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Houchun H Hu; Tai-Wei Wu; Larry Yin; Mimi S Kim; Jonathan M Chia; Thomas G Perkins; Vicente Gilsanz Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 2.546