Literature DB >> 22233698

Obtained effect size as a function of sample size in approved antidepressants: a real-world illustration in support of better trial design.

Michael Gibertini1, Kari R Nations, John A Whitaker.   

Abstract

The high failure rate of antidepressant trials has spurred exploration of the factors that affect trial sensitivity. In the current analysis, Food and Drug Administration antidepressant drug registration trial data compiled by Turner et al. is extended to include the most recently approved antidepressants. The expanded dataset is examined to further establish the likely population effect size (ES) for monoaminergic antidepressants and to demonstrate the relationship between observed ES and sample size in trials on compounds with proven efficacy. Results indicate that the overall underlying ES for antidepressants is approximately 0.30, and that the variability in observed ES across trials is related to the sample size of the trial. The current data provide a unique real-world illustration of an often underappreciated statistical truism: that small N trials are more likely to mislead than to inform, and that by aligning sample size to the population ES, risks of both erroneously high and low effects are minimized. The results in the current study make this abstract concept concrete and will help drug developers arrive at informed gate decisions with greater confidence and fewer risks, improving the odds of success for future antidepressant trials.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22233698     DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32834f504f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0268-1315            Impact factor:   1.659


  10 in total

1.  How to prove that your therapy is effective, even when it is not: a guideline.

Authors:  P Cuijpers; I A Cristea
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 6.892

2.  Changing the future, not the past: a translational paradigm shift in treating anxiety.

Authors:  Jürgen Margraf; Armin Zlomuzica
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Has the rising placebo response impacted antidepressant clinical trial outcome? Data from the US Food and Drug Administration 1987-2013.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Kaysee Fahl Mar; Jim Faucett; Shirin Khan Schilling; Walter A Brown
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 4.  Essential statistical principles of clinical trials of pain treatments.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Scott R Evans; Omar Mbowe; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-12-18

5.  Antidepressants versus placebo in major depression: an overview.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Walter A Brown
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

6.  Monoamine Oxidase-A Occupancy by Moclobemide and Phenelzine: Implications for the Development of Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Lina Chiuccariello; Robert G Cooke; Laura Miler; Robert D Levitan; Glen B Baker; Stephen J Kish; Nathan J Kolla; Pablo M Rusjan; Sylvain Houle; Alan A Wilson; Jeffrey H Meyer
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.176

7.  From neuroleptics to neuroscience and from Pavlov to psychotherapy: more than just the "emperor's new treatments" for mental illnesses?

Authors:  Jürgen Margraf; Silvia Schneider
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 12.137

8.  Effectiveness of a Pharmacogenetic Tool at Improving Treatment Efficacy in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Three Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Silvia Vilches; Miquel Tuson; Eduard Vieta; Enric Álvarez; Jordi Espadaler
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 9.  The conundrum of depression clinical trials: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Kaysee Fahl Mar; Walter A Brown
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.659

10.  John D. Loeser Award Lecture: Size does matter, but it isn't everything: the challenge of modest treatment effects in chronic pain clinical trials.

Authors:  Shannon M Smith; Maurizio Fava; Mark P Jensen; Omar B Mbowe; Michael P McDermott; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.926

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.