Literature DB >> 22231763

When parents disclose BRCA1/2 test results: their communication and perceptions of offspring response.

Angela R Bradbury1, Linda Patrick-Miller, Brian L Egleston, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Mary B Daly, Cynthia W Moore, Colleen B Sands, Helen Schmidheiser, Preethi K Kondamudi, Maia Feigon, Comfort N Ibe, Christopher K Daugherty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: BRCA1/2 testing is not recommended for children, as risk reduction measures and screening are not generally recommended before 25 years old (YO). Little is known about the prevalence and predictors of parent communication to offspring and how offspring respond to this communication.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents who had BRCA1/2 testing and at least 1 child <25 YO. Logistic regressions were utilized to evaluate associations with communication. Framework analysis was utilized to analyze open-ended responses.
RESULTS: A total of 253 parents completed interviews (61% response rate), reporting on 505 offspring. Twenty-nine percent of parents were BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Three hundred thirty-four (66%) offspring learned of their parent's test result. Older offspring age (P ≤ .01), offspring gender (female, P = .05), parents' negative test result (P = .03), and parents' education (high school only, P = .02) were associated with communication to offspring. The most frequently reported initial offspring responses were neutral (41%) or relief (28%). Thirteen percent of offspring were reported to experience concern or distress (11%) in response to parental communication of their test results. Distress was more frequently perceived among offspring learning of their parent's BRCA1/2 positive or variant of uncertain significance result.
CONCLUSIONS: Many parents communicate their BRCA1/2 test results to young offspring. Parents' perceptions of offspring responses appear to vary by offspring age and parent test result. A better understanding of how young offspring respond to information about hereditary risk for adult cancer could provide opportunities to optimize adaptive psychosocial responses to risk information and performance of health behaviors, in adolescence and throughout an at-risk life span.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22231763      PMCID: PMC3326182          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  49 in total

1.  Testing adolescents for a hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1): respecting their autonomy is in their best interest.

Authors:  B S Elger; T W Harding
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2000-02

2.  Psychosocial adjustment in children of mothers with breast cancer.

Authors:  L A Hoke
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 3.  Adolescent health psychology.

Authors:  Paula G Williams; Grayson N Holmbeck; Rachel Neff Greenley
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-06

4.  Parent opinions regarding the genetic testing of minors for BRCA1/2.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian Egleston; Colleen Burke Sands; Tianyu Li; Helen Schmidheiser; Maia Feigon; Comfort N Ibe; Fay J Hlubocky; Kisha Hope; Sarah Jackson; Melanie Corbman; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Mary Daly; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Parental communication of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to children.

Authors:  K P Tercyak; C Hughes; D Main; C Snyder; J F Lynch; H T Lynch; C Lerman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2001-03

6.  Psychological issues among children of hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1/2) testing participants.

Authors:  K P Tercyak; B N Peshkin; R Streisand; C Lerman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Is there a case in favour of predictive genetic testing in young children?

Authors:  S Robertson; J Savulescu
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.898

8.  Mother and child interactions about the mother's breast cancer: an interview study.

Authors:  M E Shands; F M Lewis; E H Zahlis
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Factors predicting communication about the diagnosis of maternal breast cancer to children.

Authors:  Jacqueline Barnes; Leanda Kroll; Joanna Lee; Olive Burke; Alison Jones; Alan Stein
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Wrestling with the future: should we test children for adult-onset genetic conditions?

Authors:  Cynthia B Cohen
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1998-06
View more
  22 in total

1.  Psychosocial Adjustment in School-age Girls With a Family History of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa Schwartz; Brian Egleston; Colleen Burke Sands; Wendy K Chung; Gord Glendon; Jasmine A McDonald; Cynthia Moore; Paula Rauch; Lisa Tuchman; Irene L Andrulis; Saundra S Buys; Caren J Frost; Theresa H M Keegan; Julia A Knight; Mary Beth Terry; Esther M John; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Genetic Test Results and Disclosure to Family Members: Qualitative Interviews of Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Ethical and Professional Issues in France.

Authors:  Diane D' Audiffret Van Haecke; Sandrine de Montgolfier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Supporting disclosure of genetic information to family members: professional practice and timelines in cancer genetics.

Authors:  Benjamin Derbez; Antoine de Pauw; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Sandrine de Montgolfier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  Disclosure of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing in pediatric genomic research.

Authors:  Ruqayyah Abdul-Karim; Benjamin E Berkman; David Wendler; Annette Rid; Javed Khan; Tom Badgett; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Human subjects protection: an event monitoring committee for research studies of girls from breast cancer families.

Authors:  Diana Harris; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa Schwartz; John Lantos; Chris Daugherty; Mary Daly; Irene L Andrulis; Saundra S Buys; Wendy K Chung; Caren J Frost; Esther M John; Theresa H M Keegan; Julia A Knight; Mary Beth Terry; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  The big reveal: Family disclosure patterns of BRCA genetic test results among young Black women with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Dana Ketcher; Maija Reblin; Monica L Kasting; Deborah Cragun; Jongphil Kim; Kimlin Tam Ashing; Cheryl L Knott; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Decisional outcomes of maternal disclosure of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to children.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Darren Mays; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Katherine A Schneider; Judy E Garber; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Psychosocial Adjustment and Perceived Risk Among Adolescent Girls From Families With BRCA1/2 or Breast Cancer History.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa A Schwartz; Brian L Egleston; Dare Henry-Moss; Susan M Domchek; Mary B Daly; Lisa Tuchman; Cynthia Moore; Paula K Rauch; Rebecca Shorter; Kelsey Karpink; Colleen Burke Sands
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Knowledge and perceptions of familial and genetic risks for breast cancer risk in adolescent girls.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Lisa A Schwartz; Colleen B Sands; Rebecca Shorter; Cynthia W Moore; Lisa Tuchman; Paula Rauch; Shreya Malhotra; Brianne Rowan; Stephanie Van Decker; Helen Schmidheiser; Lisa Bealin; Patrick Sicilia; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.