Literature DB >> 27794290

Spectral dynamics of sibilant fricatives are contrastive and language specific.

Patrick F Reidy1.   

Abstract

Previous research has extensively investigated the spectral properties of sibilant fricatives with little consideration to how these properties vary over time. To investigate such spectro-temporal variation, productions of English /s/ and /ʃ/ and of Japanese /s/ and /ɕ/ in word-initial, prevocalic position were elicited from adult native speakers. The spectral dynamics of these productions were analyzed in terms of a psychoacoustic measure of peak frequency: "peak ERBN number." Peak ERBN number was computed at 17 evenly spaced points across each fricative production. The resulting peak ERBN number trajectories were analyzed with orthogonal polynomial growth-curve models, to determine how peak frequency varied temporally within each fricative. Three analyses compared (1) the English sibilants to each other, (2) the Japanese sibilants to each other, and (3) English /s/ to Japanese /s/. The results indicated that, in both English and Japanese, the sibilant fricatives differ acoustically in terms of both static (i.e., overall level) and dynamic (i.e., shape) aspects of the peak ERBN number trajectories. Furthermore, English /s/ and Japanese /s/ exhibited language-specific differences in the shape, but not overall level, of peak ERBN number trajectories.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27794290      PMCID: PMC5132428          DOI: 10.1121/1.4964510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  A method for studying variability in fricatives using dynamic measures of spectral mean.

Authors:  B Munson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

Authors:  A Jongman; R Wayland; S Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evaluating the spectral distinction between sibilant fricatives through a speaker-centered approach.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Elizabeth Seelinger; Kerry Callahan Mandulak; David J Zajac
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2010-10-01

4.  Language-specific developmental differences in speech production: a cross-language acoustic study.

Authors:  Fangfang Li
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2012-04-27

5.  The influence of auditory acuity on acoustic variability and the use of motor equivalence during adaptation to a perturbation.

Authors:  Jana Brunner; Satrajit Ghosh; Philip Hoole; Melanie Matthies; Mark Tiede; Joseph Perkell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Interarticulator cohesion within coronal consonant production.

Authors:  Christine Mooshammer; Philip Hoole; Anja Geumann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Coordination and coarticulation in speech production.

Authors:  C A Fowler; E Saltzman
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1993 Apr-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers.

Authors:  Fangfang Li; Jan Edwards; Mary E Beckman
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2009
View more
  5 in total

1.  Quantifying robustness of the /t/-/k/ contrast using a single, static spectral feature.

Authors:  Allison A Johnson; Patrick F Reidy; Jan R Edwards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Methods for eliciting, annotating, and analyzing databases for child speech development.

Authors:  Mary E Beckman; Andrew R Plummer; Benjamin Munson; Patrick F Reidy
Journal:  Comput Speech Lang       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.899

3.  Effects of Device Limitations on Acquisition of the /t/-/k/ Contrast in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Allison A Johnson; Danielle M Bentley; Benjamin Munson; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Reliability and Repeatability of the Speech Cue Profile.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun; Paul Reinhart
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Acoustic-phonetic and auditory mechanisms of adaptation in the perception of sibilant fricatives.

Authors:  Eleanor Chodroff; Colin Wilson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.