| Literature DB >> 22223261 |
Stefan Mathis-Edenhofer1, Brigitte Piso.
Abstract
This work presents a comprehensive list of registry definitions including broader and narrower definitions. Compared to each other different methodological issues can be identified. Some of these issues are common for all registry types; some can be assigned more easily to a specific registry type. Instruments for evaluating the quality of registers reflect many of the mentioned aspects. Generally, and especially at registers with a descriptive or exploratory research dimension it is important to consider their intended purpose and in about it was achieved. This includes, for instance, whether the purpose and the methodology are coordinated. From the start of registration an initiator should be - based on the purpose - aware of the methodological dimension of the registry. This helps to apply the correct type of the registry, the appropriate guidance and, ultimately, the arguments for the effort (cost-benefit ratio).Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22223261 DOI: 10.1007/s10354-011-0040-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr ISSN: 0043-5341