Literature DB >> 7636820

Improving the quality of cancer registration data.

D Brewster1.   

Abstract

Cancer registration is an essential element of any cancer control strategy. Data quality is, however, of paramount importance. This paper sets out some of the ways in which the quality of cancer registration data might be improved. In particular, the potential contribution of clinicians and pathologists is highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1995        PMID： 7636820      PMCID： PMC1295197     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN： 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  26 in total

1.  Relative value of incidence and mortality data in cancer research.

Authors:  P Boyle
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1989

2.  Cancer registration of leukaemias and lymphomas: results of a comparison with a specialist registry.

Authors:  F Alexander; T J Ricketts; P A McKinney; R A Cartwright
Journal:  Community Med       Date:  1989-05

3.  Can we achieve 100% ascertainment in cancer registration?

Authors:  P B Silcocks; H Thornton-Jones; R G Skeet
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.427

Review 4.  Registers and registries: a review.

Authors:  J M Weddell
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Cancer registration: historical aspects.

Authors:  G Wagner
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1985

Review 6.  Registry evaluation methods: a review and case study.

Authors:  J Goldberg; H M Gelfand; P S Levy
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  The cancer registry in cancer control: an overview.

Authors:  C S Muir; E Démaret; P Boyle
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1985

8.  Accuracy of basic cancer patient data: results from an extensive recoding survey.

Authors:  L Polissar; P Feigl; W W Lane; G Glaefke; S Dahlberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The completeness of cancer registration in England: an assessment from the Oxford-FPA contraceptive study.

Authors:  L Villard-Mackintosh; M P Coleman; M P Vessey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data?

Authors:  D Brewster; J Crichton; C Muir
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.640
View more
  3 in total

1.  [Types of medical registries - definitions, methodological aspects and quality of the scientific work with registries].

Authors:  Stefan Mathis-Edenhofer; Brigitte Piso
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-12

2.  Benefits and limitations of pathology databases to cancer registries.

Authors:  D H Brewster; J Crichton; J C Harvey; G Dawson; E R Nairn
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Are online prediction tools a valid alternative to genomic profiling in the context of systemic treatment of ER-positive breast cancer?

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Kinan Mokbel; Amtul Carmichael; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.787
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.