Literature DB >> 1902306

Evaluation and implementation of public health registries.

D J Solomon1, R C Henry, J G Hogan, G H Van Amburg, J Taylor.   

Abstract

A rapid proliferation of registries has occurred during the last 20 years. Given the long-term commitment of resources associated with registries and limited public health funding, proposals for new registries should be carefully considered before being funded. A registry is defined as a data base of identifiable persons containing a clearly defined set of health and demographic data collected for a specific public health purpose. Criteria for evaluating whether a registry is needed, feasible, or the most effective and efficient means of collecting a specific set of health data are presented. They include an evaluation of the stated purpose; a review of the function, duration, and scope of the registry; consideration of existing alternative data sources; an assessment of the practical feasibility of the registry; the likelihood of sufficient start-up and long-term funding; and an evaluation of the cost effectiveness of the registry. Creating a public health registry is a complex process. A range of technical and organizational skills is required for a registry to be successfully implemented. Eight requirements are identified as crucial for the successful development of a new registry. They include an implementation plan, adequate documentation, quality control procedures, case definition and case-finding (ascertainment) procedures, determination of data elements, data collection and processing procedures, data access policy, and a framework for dissemination of registry data and findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1902306      PMCID: PMC1580226     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  4 in total

Review 1.  Public health surveillance in the United States.

Authors:  S B Thacker; R L Berkelman
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  A method for evaluating systems of epidemiological surveillance.

Authors:  S B Thacker; R G Parrish; F L Trowbridge
Journal:  World Health Stat Q       Date:  1988

Review 3.  Registers and registries: a review.

Authors:  J M Weddell
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Comparison of an active and passive surveillance system of primary care providers for hepatitis, measles, rubella, and salmonellosis in Vermont.

Authors:  R L Vogt; D LaRue; D N Klaucke; D A Jillson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 9.308

  4 in total
  22 in total

Review 1.  Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework.

Authors:  Danielle G T Arts; Nicolette F De Keizer; Gert-Jan Scheffer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Global registries for measuring pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life outcomes: focus on design and data collection, analysis and interpretation.

Authors:  Lisa Kennedy; Ann-Marie Craig
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  [Types of medical registries - definitions, methodological aspects and quality of the scientific work with registries].

Authors:  Stefan Mathis-Edenhofer; Brigitte Piso
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-12

4.  Preventing recurrent rheumatic fever: the role of register based programmes.

Authors:  M McDonald; A Brown; S Noonan; J R Carapetis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Considerations Before Establishing an Environmental Health Registry.

Authors:  Vinicius C Antao; Oleg I Muravov; James Sapp; Theodore C Larson; L Laszlo Pallos; Marchelle E Sanchez; G David Williamson; D Kevin Horton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  [RD] PRISM Library: Patient Registry Item Specifications and Metadata for Rare Diseases.

Authors:  Rachel Richesson; Denise Shereff; James Andrews
Journal:  J Libr Metadata       Date:  2010-04-01

Review 7.  Creating an effective clinical registry for rare diseases.

Authors:  Hedwig Ma D'Agnolo; Wietske Kievit; Raul J Andrade; Tom Hemming Karlsen; Heiner Wedemeyer; Joost Ph Drenth
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.623

8.  Arizona Alzheimer's Registry: Strategy and Outcomes of a Statewide Research Recruitment Registry.

Authors:  K T Saunders; J B Langbaum; C J Holt; W Chen; N High; C Langlois; M Sabbagh; P N Tariot
Journal:  J Prev Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2014-09

9.  A renal registry for Africa: first steps.

Authors:  M Razeen Davids; John B Eastwood; Neville H Selwood; Fatiu A Arogundade; Gloria Ashuntantang; Mohammed Benghanem Gharbi; Faiçal Jarraya; Iain A M MacPhee; Mignon McCulloch; Jacob Plange-Rhule; Charles R Swanepoel; Dwomoa Adu
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2015-11-25

10.  Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Dewan Md Emdadul Hoque; Varuni Kumari; Rasa Ruseckaite; Lorena Romero; Sue M Evans
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.