Literature DB >> 19128954

Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.

D Max Parkin1, Freddie Bray.   

Abstract

The completeness of cancer registry data -- the extent to which all of the incident cancers occurring in the population are included in the registry database -- is an extremely important attribute of a cancer registry. Only a high degree of completeness in case-finding procedures will ensure cancer incidence rates and survival proportions are close to their true value. This second instalment of a two-part review of data quality methods at the cancer registry, focuses on the principles and techniques available for estimating completeness, separating methods into those that are semi-quantitative -- in that they give an indication of the degree of completeness relative to other registries or over time, and more quantitative techniques -- those that provide a numerical evaluation of the extent to which all eligible cases have been registered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19128954     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  118 in total

1.  [Types of medical registries - definitions, methodological aspects and quality of the scientific work with registries].

Authors:  Stefan Mathis-Edenhofer; Brigitte Piso
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-12

2.  Cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios in Georgia: describing racial cancer disparities and potential geographic determinants.

Authors:  Sara E Wagner; Deborah M Hurley; James R Hébert; Chrissy McNamara; A Rana Bayakly; John E Vena
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Missing values in deduplication of electronic patient data.

Authors:  M Sariyar; A Borg; K Pommerening
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer: Depleting a limited pool of susceptible individuals?

Authors:  Morten Valberg; Tom Grotmol; Steinar Tretli; Marit B Veierød; Tron A Moger; Susan S Devesa; Odd O Aalen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 5.  Appraising the quality of sub-Saharan African cancer registration systems that contributed to GLOBOCAN 2008: a review of the literature and critical appraisal.

Authors:  Tim Crocker-Buque; Allyson M Pollock
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Establishing effective registration systems in resource-limited settings: cancer registration in Kumasi, Ghana.

Authors:  Kieran S O'Brien; Amr S Soliman; Baffour Awuah; Evelyn Jiggae; Ernest Osei-Bonsu; Solomon Quayson; Ernest Adjei; Silpa S Thaivalappil; Frank Abantanga; Sofia D Merajver
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2013

7.  Incidence and mortality of primary liver cancer in England and Wales: changing patterns and ethnic variations.

Authors:  Nimzing G Ladep; Shahid A Khan; Mary Me Crossey; Andrew V Thillainayagam; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Mireille B Toledano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Female breast cancer incidence and mortality in 2011, China.

Authors:  Manman Jia; Rongshou Zheng; Siwei Zhang; Hongmei Zeng; Xiaonong Zou; Wanqing Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Breast cancer in Portugal: Temporal trends and age-specific incidence by geographic regions.

Authors:  Gonçalo Forjaz de Lacerda; Scott P Kelly; Joana Bastos; Clara Castro; Alexandra Mayer; Angela B Mariotto; William F Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  A visual summary of the EUROCARE-4 results: a UK perspective.

Authors:  H Møller; K M Linklater; D Robinson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.