Literature DB >> 22223219

Computational protein design with explicit consideration of surface hydrophobic patches.

Ron Jacak1, Andrew Leaver-Fay, Brian Kuhlman.   

Abstract

De novo protein design requires the identification of amino-acid sequences that favor the target-folded conformation and are soluble in water. One strategy for promoting solubility is to disallow hydrophobic residues on the protein surface during design. However, naturally occurring proteins often have hydrophobic amino acids on their surface that contribute to protein stability via the partial burial of hydrophobic surface area or play a key role in the formation of protein-protein interactions. A less restrictive approach for surface design that is used by the modeling program Rosetta is to parameterize the energy function so that the number of hydrophobic amino acids designed on the protein surface is similar to what is observed in naturally occurring monomeric proteins. Previous studies with Rosetta have shown that this limits surface hydrophobics to the naturally occurring frequency (∼28%), but that it does not prevent the formation of hydrophobic patches that are considerably larger than those observed in naturally occurring proteins. Here, we describe a new score term that explicitly detects and penalizes the formation of hydrophobic patches during computational protein design. With the new term, we are able to design protein surfaces that include hydrophobic amino acids at naturally occurring frequencies, but do not have large hydrophobic patches. By adjusting the strength of the new score term, the emphasis of surface redesigns can be switched between maintaining solubility and maximizing folding free energy.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22223219      PMCID: PMC3277657          DOI: 10.1002/prot.23241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  40 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations.

Authors:  Raphael Guerois; Jens Erik Nielsen; Luis Serrano
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity.

Authors:  Navin Pokala; Tracy M Handel
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Supercharging proteins can impart unusual resilience.

Authors:  Michael S Lawrence; Kevin J Phillips; David R Liu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Maintaining solvent accessible surface area under rotamer substitution for protein design.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Glenn L Butterfoss; Jack Snoeyink; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Designing amino acid sequences to fold with good hydrophobic cores.

Authors:  S Sun; R Brem; H S Chan; K A Dill
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1995-12

8.  Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins.

Authors:  J Janin; S Miller; C Chothia
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1988-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Principles of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  S Jones; J M Thornton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Surface-exposed phenylalanines in the RNP1/RNP2 motif stabilize the cold-shock protein CspB from Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  T Schindler; D Perl; P Graumann; V Sieber; M A Marahiel; F X Schmid
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-03-01
View more
  31 in total

1.  Computational tools help improve protein stability but with a solubility tradeoff.

Authors:  Aron Broom; Zachary Jacobi; Kyle Trainor; Elizabeth M Meiering
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Tertiary alphabet for the observable protein structural universe.

Authors:  Craig O Mackenzie; Jianfu Zhou; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Predicting enzyme adsorption to lignin films by calculating enzyme surface hydrophobicity.

Authors:  Deanne W Sammond; John M Yarbrough; Elisabeth Mansfield; Yannick J Bomble; Sarah E Hobdey; Stephen R Decker; Larry E Taylor; Michael G Resch; Joseph J Bozell; Michael E Himmel; Todd B Vinzant; Michael F Crowley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Discovery and engineering of enhanced SUMO protease enzymes.

Authors:  Yue-Ting K Lau; Vladimir Baytshtok; Tessa A Howard; Brooke M Fiala; JayLee M Johnson; Lauren P Carter; David Baker; Christopher D Lima; Christopher D Bahl
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  An Evolution-Based Approach to De Novo Protein Design.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Brender; David Shultis; Naureen Aslam Khattak; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

Review 6.  Energy functions in de novo protein design: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Zhixiu Li; Yuedong Yang; Jian Zhan; Liang Dai; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

7.  Scientific benchmarks for guiding macromolecular energy function improvement.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Matthew J O'Meara; Mike Tyka; Ron Jacak; Yifan Song; Elizabeth H Kellogg; James Thompson; Ian W Davis; Roland A Pache; Sergey Lyskov; Jeffrey J Gray; Tanja Kortemme; Jane S Richardson; James J Havranek; Jack Snoeyink; David Baker; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Combined computational design of a zinc-binding site and a protein-protein interaction: one open zinc coordination site was not a robust hotspot for de novo ubiquitin binding.

Authors:  Bryan S Der; Ramesh K Jha; Raamesh K Jha; Steven M Lewis; Peter M Thompson; Gurkan Guntas; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-04-20

Review 9.  Recent advances in automated protein design and its future challenges.

Authors:  Dani Setiawan; Jeffrey Brender; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 6.098

10.  De novo design of protein homo-oligomers with modular hydrogen-bond network-mediated specificity.

Authors:  Scott E Boyken; Zibo Chen; Benjamin Groves; Robert A Langan; Gustav Oberdorfer; Alex Ford; Jason M Gilmore; Chunfu Xu; Frank DiMaio; Jose Henrique Pereira; Banumathi Sankaran; Georg Seelig; Peter H Zwart; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.