Literature DB >> 22220877

Can reinforcement complete speciation?

Claudia Bank1, Joachim Hermisson, Mark Kirkpatrick.   

Abstract

Hybridization is common in nature, even between "good" species. This observation poses the question of why reinforcement is not always successful in leading to the evolution of complete reproductive isolation. To study this question, we developed a new "quasi-linkage disequilibrium" (QLD) approximation to obtain the first analytic results for the evolution of modifiers that increase mate discrimination against hybrids and heterospecifics. When such modifiers have small effects, they evolve more readily under a one-allele than a two-allele mechanism (sensu Felsenstein 1981). The strength of selection on the modifier decreases as hybrids decrease in frequency, and so further reinforcement may not occur once hybridization is sufficiently rare. The outcome is qualitatively different when modifiers have large effects, however, for example, when a single mutation can cause complete reproductive isolation. In this case, modifiers in a two-allele mechanism can be selected as or more strongly than those in a one-allele mechanism. Furthermore, they can spread under quite general conditions. Thus, whether complete closure of genetic introgression by reinforcement occurs may depend on the size of effects that mutations have on the sensory systems used in mate choice. No Claim to original U.S. government works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22220877     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01423.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   4.171


  11 in total

1.  The counterintuitive role of sexual selection in species maintenance and speciation.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sexual selection against natural hybrids may contribute to reinforcement in a house mouse hybrid zone.

Authors:  Yasmin Latour; Marco Perriat-Sanguinet; Pierre Caminade; Pierre Boursot; Carole M Smadja; Guila Ganem
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.

Authors:  Samuel S Snow; Suzanne H Alonzo; Maria R Servedio; Richard O Prum
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Seeking signatures of reinforcement at the genetic level: a hitchhiking mapping and candidate gene approach in the house mouse.

Authors:  Carole M Smadja; Etienne Loire; Pierre Caminade; Marios Thoma; Yasmin Latour; Camille Roux; Michaela Thoss; Dustin J Penn; Guila Ganem; Pierre Boursot
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  The limits to parapatric speciation: Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities in a continent-island model.

Authors:  Claudia Bank; Reinhard Bürger; Joachim Hermisson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Mate Choice Drives Evolutionary Stability in a Hybrid Complex.

Authors:  Miguel Morgado-Santos; Henrique Miguel Pereira; Luís Vicente; Maria João Collares-Pereira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Geography, assortative mating, and the effects of sexual selection on speciation with gene flow.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Darwinism for the Genomic Age: Connecting Mutation to Diversification.

Authors:  Xia Hua; Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Reinforcement's incidental effects on reproductive isolation between conspecifics.

Authors:  Aaron A Comeault; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.624

10.  Evolution of multiple postzygotic barriers between species of the Mimulus tilingii complex.

Authors:  Gabrielle D Sandstedt; Carrie A Wu; Andrea L Sweigart
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.