Literature DB >> 24352947

Sexual selection against natural hybrids may contribute to reinforcement in a house mouse hybrid zone.

Yasmin Latour1, Marco Perriat-Sanguinet, Pierre Caminade, Pierre Boursot, Carole M Smadja, Guila Ganem.   

Abstract

Sexual selection may hinder gene flow across contact zones when hybrid recognition signals are discriminated against. We tested this hypothesis in a unimodal hybrid zone between Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus where a pattern of reinforcement was described and lower hybrid fitness documented. We presented mice from the border of the hybrid zone with a choice between opposite sex urine from the same subspecies versus hybrids sampled in different locations across the zone. While no preference was evidenced in domesticus mice, musculus males discriminated in favour of musculus signals and against hybrid signals. Remarkably, the pattern of hybrid unattractiveness did not vary across the hybrid zone. Moreover, allopatric populations tested in the same conditions did not discriminate against hybrid signals, indicating character displacement for signal perception or preference. Finally, habituation-discrimination tests assessing similarities between signals pointed out that hybrid signals differed from the parental ones. Overall, our results suggest that perception of hybrids as unattractive has evolved in border populations of musculus after the secondary contact with domesticus. We discuss the mechanisms involved in hybrid unattractiveness, and the potential impact of asymmetric sexual selection on the hybrid zone dynamics and gene flow between the two subspecies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hybrid signal; mate recognition; reproductive character displacement; speciation; urinary cues

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24352947      PMCID: PMC3871321          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  46 in total

Review 1.  Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation.

Authors:  L H Rieseberg; M A Archer; R K Wayne
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Speciation: Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities, dominance and gene interactions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers.

Authors:  T Veen; T Borge; S C Griffith; G P Saetre; S Bures; L Gustafsson; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Genetic similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; L Morris Gosling
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08-24       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Strong premating divergence in a unimodal hybrid zone between two subspecies of the house mouse.

Authors:  G Smadja; J Catalan; C Ganem
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic communication system of green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea).

Authors:  Gerlinde Höbel; H Carl Gerhardt
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Patterns of inheritance of mating signals in interspecific hybrids between sailfin and shortfin mollies (Poeciliidae: Poecilia: Mollienesia).

Authors:  Margaret B Ptacek
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Sexual selection promotes hybridization between Pecos pupfish, Cyprinodon pecosensis and sheepshead minnow, C. variegatus.

Authors:  J A Rosenfield; A Kodric-Brown
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Reproductive isolating mechanisms between two sympatric sibling species of sea snakes.

Authors:  Richard Shine; Robert N Reed; Sohan Shetty; Michael Lemaster; Robert T Mason
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  11 in total

1.  Hybrid female mate choice as a species isolating mechanism: environment matters.

Authors:  E M Schmidt; K S Pfennig
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Seeking signatures of reinforcement at the genetic level: a hitchhiking mapping and candidate gene approach in the house mouse.

Authors:  Carole M Smadja; Etienne Loire; Pierre Caminade; Marios Thoma; Yasmin Latour; Camille Roux; Michaela Thoss; Dustin J Penn; Guila Ganem; Pierre Boursot
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Selection and isolation define a heterogeneous divergence landscape between hybridizing Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Steven M Van Belleghem; Jared M Cole; Gabriela Montejo-Kovacevich; Caroline N Bacquet; W Owen McMillan; Riccardo Papa; Brian A Counterman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Testing models of speciation from genome sequences: divergence and asymmetric admixture in Island South-East Asian Sus species during the Plio-Pleistocene climatic fluctuations.

Authors:  Laurent A F Frantz; Ole Madsen; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Martien A M Groenen; Konrad Lohse
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Multiple sexual selection pressures drive the rapid evolution of complex morphology in a male secondary genital structure.

Authors:  Stephen R Frazee; John P Masly
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  No speed dating please! Patterns of social preference in male and female house mice.

Authors:  Miriam Linnenbrink; Sophie von Merten
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  Molecular heterogeneity in major urinary proteins of Mus musculus subspecies: potential candidates involved in speciation.

Authors:  Jane L Hurst; Robert J Beynon; Stuart D Armstrong; Amanda J Davidson; Sarah A Roberts; Guadalupe Gómez-Baena; Carole M Smadja; Guila Ganem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Neurogenomic divergence during speciation by reinforcement of mating behaviors in chorus frogs (Pseudacris).

Authors:  Oscar E Ospina; Alan R Lemmon; Mysia Dye; Christopher Zdyrski; Sean Holland; Daniel Stribling; Michelle L Kortyna; Emily Moriarty Lemmon
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  The role of copy-number variation in the reinforcement of sexual isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse.

Authors:  Henry L North; Pierre Caminade; Dany Severac; Khalid Belkhir; Carole M Smadja
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Population Genomics of the Neotropical Brown Stink Bug, Euschistus heros: The Most Important Emerging Insect Pest to Soybean in Brazil.

Authors:  Maria I Zucchi; Erick M G Cordeiro; Xing Wu; Letícia Marise Lamana; Patrick J Brown; Shilpa Manjunatha; João Paulo Gomes Viana; Celso Omoto; José B Pinheiro; Steven J Clough
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.