| Literature DB >> 22216342 |
Xiaowen Liu1, Hong Cai, Hua Huang, Ziwen Long, Yingqiang Shi, Yanong Wang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22216342 PMCID: PMC3247293 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029670
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Positive expression of apoptosis-related biological markers immunohistochemistry in gastric cancer tissue.
A) Positive expression of p53. B) Positive expression of bcl-2. C) Positive expression of bax. D) Positive expression of c-myc. (Original magnification: all ×100).
Positive results of correlations among immunohistochemical markers.
| Immunohistochemical markers | Correlation coefficients (r) | P value | |
| p53 | Bax | 0.097 | 0.029 |
| p53 | c-myc | 0.171 | 0.000 |
| bcl-2 | Bax | 0.139 | 0.002 |
| Bax | c-myc | 0.132 | 0.003 |
Positive results of correlations between immunohistochemical markers and clinicopathological parameters.
| Variable | p53+ | Bcl-2+ | bax+ | c-myc+ | |||||
| n | % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| |
| Sex | 0.156 | 0.980 | 0.016 | 0.549 | |||||
| Female | 162 | 60.5 | 22.2 | 35.2 | 56.2 | ||||
| Male | 339 | 66.9 | 22.1 | 46.6 | 58.9 | ||||
| Age (y) | 0.239 | 0.676 | 0.733 | 0.720 | |||||
| <60 | 284 | 62.7 | 21.5 | 42.3 | 57.4 | ||||
| ≥60 | 217 | 67.7 | 23.0 | 43.8 | 58.9 | ||||
| Histological type | 0.000 | 0.178 | 0.006 | 0.190 | |||||
| well-differentiated | 9 | 88.8 | 0.00 | 44.4 | 66.6 | ||||
| moderately-differentiated | 164 | 72.6 | 25.0 | 53.0 | 63.4 | ||||
| poorly-differentiated | 328 | 60.3 | 21.3 | 37.8 | 55.2 | ||||
| Tumor site | 0.421 | 0.623 | 0.000 | 0.649 | |||||
| Upper third | 159 | 66.7 | 23.8 | 55.9 | 59.7 | ||||
| Middle Third | 72 | 59.7 | 18.1 | 27.8 | 62.5 | ||||
| Low third | 244 | 63.9 | 22.9 | 39.3 | 55.3 | ||||
| Two-thirds or more | 26 | 76.9 | 15.4 | 38.5 | 61.5 | ||||
| Borrmann type | 0.454 | 0.332 | 0.002 | 0.002 | |||||
| 0 | 57 | 56.1 | 14.0 | 19.3 | 33.3 | ||||
| I | 36 | 66.7 | 25.0 | 41.7 | 55.5 | ||||
| II | 15 | 60.0 | 33.3 | 53.3 | 60.0 | ||||
| III | 371 | 65.5 | 23.2 | 46.9 | 62.2 | ||||
| IV | 22 | 77.3 | 13.6 | 31.8 | 54.5 | ||||
| Lymph nodes status | 0.152 | 0.248 | 0.025 | 0.214 | |||||
| Yes | 356 | 62.9 | 20.7 | 46.1 | 59.8 | ||||
| No | 145 | 69.6 | 25.5 | 35.2 | 53.8 | ||||
| Pathological stage | 0.561 | 0.000 | 0.026 | 0.243 | |||||
| I | 87 | 60.9 | 18.4 | 29.8 | 51.7 | ||||
| II | 143 | 67.8 | 34.3 | 46.1 | 55.9 | ||||
| III | 271 | 64.6 | 16.9 | 45.4 | 61.3 | ||||
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to the expression of bcl-2.
There were significant differences between bcl-2+ and bcl-2− (P = 0.005).
Univariate analysis of all patients by Kaplan-Meier method.
| Variable | n | 5-Year survival rate (%) | Log rank χ2 value | P value |
| Sex | 0.374 | 0.541 | ||
| Female | 162 | 56.8 | ||
| Male | 339 | 52.2 | ||
| Age (y) | 0.484 | 0.487 | ||
| <60 | 284 | 56.0 | ||
| ≥60 | 217 | 50.7 | ||
| Tumor site | 31.896 | 0.000 | ||
| Upper third | 159 | 42.8 | ||
| Middle third | 72 | 44.4 | ||
| Lower third | 244 | 66.0 | ||
| Two-thirds or more | 26 | 30.8 | ||
| Borrmann type | 43.615 | 0.000 | ||
| 0 | 57 | 87.7 | ||
| I | 36 | 44.4 | ||
| II | 15 | 60.0 | ||
| III | 371 | 50.9 | ||
| IV | 22 | 22.7 | ||
| Lymph nodes metastasis | 63.969 | 0.000 | ||
| Yes | 356 | 42.1 | ||
| No | 145 | 82.1 | ||
| Pathological stage | 106.030 | 0.000 | ||
| I | 87 | 93.1 | ||
| II | 143 | 65.0 | ||
| III | 271 | 35.1 | ||
| Bcl-2 | 7.712 | 0.005 | ||
| + | 111 | 64.9 | ||
| − | 390 | 50.5 |
Multivariate analysis of patients by Cox model.
| Variable | χ2 |
| RR | 95% CI |
| Sex | 0.123 | 0.726 | 1.053 | 0.788–1.409 |
| Age | 2.257 | 0.133 | 0.816 | 0.625–1.064 |
| Borrmann type | 0.128 | 0.721 | 1.035 | 0.858–1.247 |
| Lymph node metastasis | 1.227 | 0.268 | 0.739 | 0.433–1.262 |
| Tumor site | 3.500 | 0.061 | 0.880 | 0.770–1.006 |
| Pathological stage | 45.611 | 0.000 | 1.517 | 1.344–1.712 |
| Bcl-2 | 4.935 | 0.026 | 1.491 | 1.048–2.121 |
Figure 3Comparison of survival according to Borrmann III and tumor stage.
A) There were significant differences between bcl-2+ group and bcl-2− group according to Borrmann III (P = 0.002). B) There were no significant differences according to stage II. C) There were no significant differences according to stage III.