Literature DB >> 7959188

Dukes's classification: a valid prognostic indicator for gastric cancer.

Y Adachi1, M Mori, Y Maehara, K Sugimachi.   

Abstract

Dukes's classification for colorectal cancer is simple, and correlates well with survival. This study assessed whether the principles of Dukes's classification applied to gastric cancer resulted in the separation of prognostically useful groups. The cumulative survival curves determined by Dukes's, Astler-Coller's (another classification for colorectal cancer), and the Japanese classification for gastric cancer were evaluated using 476 curatively treated patients with gastric cancer. Of the three staging systems, both Dukes's and the Japanese classifications showed a step-wise relationship between the stage of the tumour and the survival of patients. The prognostic value of Dukes's classification was reinforced when Dukes's C cases were subdivided according to the number of positive nodes (1-6 v > or = 7) or the level of positive nodes (n1 v n2,n3) but not when the subdivision was made according to the depth of wall invasion. A modified Dukes's classification in which Dukes's cases are subdivided according to the number of metastatic nodes (Dukes's Ca = 1-6 nodes, Dukes's Cb > 6 nodes) could be both simply and accurately applied to gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7959188      PMCID: PMC1375006          DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.10.1368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  10 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  V B ASTLER; F A COLLER
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Prophylactic lymph node dissection in patients with advanced gastric cancer promotes increased survival time.

Authors:  Y Maehara; T Okuyama; S Moriguchi; H Orita; H Kusumoto; D Korenaga; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Quantitative analysis of nodal involvement with respect to survival rate after curative gastrectomy for carcinoma.

Authors:  T Okusa; Y Nakane; T Boku; H Takada; M Yamamura; K Hioki; M Yamamoto
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-06

4.  Dukes' classification revisited. Findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Projects (Protocol R-01).

Authors:  E R Fisher; R Sass; A Palekar; B Fisher; N Wolmark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Level of axillary involvement by lymph node metastases from breast cancer is not an independent predictor of survival.

Authors:  R J Barth; D N Danforth; D J Venzon; K L Straus; T d'Angelo; M J Merino; L Gerber
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1991-05

6.  Comparison of survival curves of gastric cancer patients after surgery according to the UICC stage classification and the General Rules for Gastric Cancer Study by the Japanese Research Society for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Y Nio; M Tsubono; K Kawabata; Y Masai; H Hayashi; C Meyer; K Inoue; T Tobe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Prognostic significance of the number of positive lymph nodes in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Adachi; T Kamakura; M Mori; H Baba; Y Maehara; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Is staging of cancer of value?

Authors:  D T Carr
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Lymphadenectomy in gastric carcinoma. A prospective and prognostic study.

Authors:  J Jaehne; H J Meyer; H Maschek; H Geerlings; E Burns; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-03

10.  Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a multivariate analysis of clinical, pathologic and treatment factors.

Authors:  M H Shiu; M Perrotti; M F Brennan
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1989-02
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Tumor infiltration pattern into the surrounding tissue has prognostic significance in advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Saito; Kozo Miyatani; Seigo Takaya; Hirohiko Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Yoji Fukumoto; Tomohiro Osaki; Masahide Ikeguchi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sung Ryol Lee; Hyung Ook Kim; Byung Ho Son; Jun Ho Shin; Chang Hak Yoo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Clinical significance of skip metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Saito; Shunichi Tsujitani; Masahide Ikeguchi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  The prognostic significance of apoptosis-related biological markers in Chinese gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Xiaowen Liu; Hong Cai; Hua Huang; Ziwen Long; Yingqiang Shi; Yanong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Analysis of lymph node metastasis correlation with prognosis in patients with T2 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaowen Liu; Ziwen Long; Hong Cai; Hua Huang; Yingqiang Shi; Yanong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The risk of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer conforming to indications of endoscopic resection and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Wu Yanzhang; Li Guanghua; Zhou Zhihao; Wang Zhixiong; Wang Zhao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Pathological and oncological outcomes of pylorus-preserving versus conventional distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sen Hou; Fan Liu; Zhidong Gao; Yingjiang Ye
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.253

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.