Literature DB >> 22215974

Estimates of DNA damage by the comet assay in the direct-developing frog Eleutherodactylus johnstonei (Anura, Eleutherodactylidae).

Laura Carolina Valencia1, Adriana García, Martha Patricia Ramírez-Pinilla, Jorge Luis Fuentes.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to use the Comet assay to assess genetic damage in the direct-developing frog Eleutherodactylus johnstonei. A DNA diffusion assay was used to evaluate the effectiveness of alkaline, enzymatic and alkaline/enzymatic treatments for lysing E. johnstonei blood cells and to determine the amount of DNA strand breakage associated with apoptosis and necrosis. Cell sensitivity to the mutagens bleomycin (BLM) and 4-nitro-quinoline-1-oxide (4NQO) was also assessed using the Comet assay, as was the assay reproducibility. Alkaline treatment did not lyse the cytoplasmic and nuclear membranes of E. johnstonei blood cells, whereas enzymatic digestion with proteinase K (40 μg/mL) yielded naked nuclei. The contribution of apoptosis and necrosis (assessed by the DNA diffusion assay) to DNA damage was estimated to range from 0% to 8%. BLM and 4NQO induced DNA damage in E. johnstonei blood cells at different concentrations and exposure times. Dose-effect curves with both mutagens were highly reproducible and showed consistently low coefficients of variation (CV ≤ 10%). The results are discussed with regard to the potential use of the modified Comet assay for assessing the exposure of E. johnstonei to herbicides in ecotoxicological studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide; Comet assay; DNA diffusion assay; Eleutherodactylus johnstonei; bleomycin

Year:  2011        PMID: 22215974      PMCID: PMC3229125          DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572011005000048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1415-4757            Impact factor:   1.771


Introduction

Amphibians are useful biological indicators because their sensitive skins and occurrence in aquatic and terrestrial habitats makes them vulnerable to environmental change (Blaustein and Wake, 1990; Lips, 1998). Studies using frogs as models to measure the environmental impact of xenobiotics have used mainly larval phases of biphasic frog species such as Anaxyrus americanus, Hyla versicolor, Lithobates catesbeianus, Lithobates clamitans and Lithobates pipiens (Berrill ; Relyea, 2004a,b). Most Neotropical frogs have direct development and reproduce on land (Hedges ). However, few studies have assessed the usefulness of these species as environmental bioindicators. Eleutherodactylus johnstonei (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae) is a direct-developing frog (Hedges ) from the Lesser Antilles with recently established populations in several Caribbean islands (Kaiser, 1997), as well as in Central and South America (Ortega ; Kaiser ). As a consequence of its widespread distribution and certain life history features (reproductive flexibility and high environmental adaptability) (Ortega ), E. jonhstonei has been considered a successful invasive species (Rödder, 2009). These attributes also suggest that this species could be a useful model for evaluating the genotoxicological impact of environmental xenobiotics such as pesticides. DNA damage by environmental xenobiotics is frequently assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) or the Comet assay (Singh ), which detects DNA strand breakage and alkali-labile sites by measuring the migration of DNA from immobilized individual cell nuclei. In this assay, the cells are embedded in agarose gel on microscopic slides, lysed and then electrophoresed under alkaline condition. Cells with damaged DNA show increased migration of DNA fragments from the nucleus and the length of the migration indicates the amount of DNA strand breakage; the latter can be estimated by manual and computerized image scoring procedures (Kumaravel ). The technique is highly sensitive for detecting DNA damage in any eukaryotic cell type and requires only a few cells. The minimal technical requirements for doing this assay in vitro and in vivo are well established (Cotelle and Férard, 1999; Tice ; Hartmann ). The Comet assay is sufficiently sensitive for detecting DNA damage in frogs (Dhawan ). The main aim of this work was to assess the usefulness of the Comet assay for detecting DNA damage in E. johnstonei. The efficiency of alkaline, enzymatic and alkaline/enzymatic treatments for lysing E. johnstonei blood cells was also assessed using a DNA diffusion assay. Since positive Comet results do not necessarily reflect genotoxicity because DNA strand breakage may be associated with cellular apoptosis and necrosis, we used the DNA diffusion assay (Singh, 2000a) to determine the percentage of DNA strand breakage associated with apoptosis and necrosis (%NAp/N) and thereby estimate the proportion of DNA strand breakage that was unrelated to apoptosis and necrosis. Cell sensitivity to the mutagens bleomycin (BLM) and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO) was examined based on DNA strand breakage detected with the Comet assay (Baohong ; Kumaravel and Jha, 2006); the reproducibility of the assay in this species was also addressed.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

Bleomycin (BML), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), phosphotungstic acid, molecular grade and low gel temperature (LGT) agaroses, 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO), silver nitrate and sodium N-lauryl sarcosine were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). RNase-and DNase-free proteinase K and PK buffer were obtained from Promega Co. (Madison, WI, USA). Glycerol was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The other reagents and solvents were obtained from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA).

Capture and maintenance of frogs

Eleutherodactylus johnstonei specimens were captured at several sites in the Bucaramanga metropolitan area (Santander, Colombia). Research and collecting permission was given by the Corporación Regional para la Defensa de la Meseta de Bucaramanga (File PC-0014-2008, Resolution 001368). Specimen sex was determined based on species sexual dimorphism and male calling. The frogs were maintained in glass terrariums at 24 ± 2 °C on a 12 h light/dark photoperiod, in conditions (vegetation, air circulation, humidity, illumination, etc.) that simulated the wild habitat. The frogs were fed flies, crickets, spiders, ants and mosquitoes that were captured on the campus of the Universidad Industrial de Santander (Bucaramanga, Colombia).

Blood sampling, cell counts and exposure to mutagens

Blood obtained by cardiac puncture of cold-anesthetized frogs was collected in heparinized Eppendorf tubes and placed on ice until assayed. Blood cells were counted in a Neubauer counting chamber and then diluted in 0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution to a cell density of 3.55 × 106 cells/mL. Aliquots of blood cells were treated with BLM (0.6–152.0 μg/mL) or 4NQO (1.9–60.0 μM) for 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12 h (selected on the basis of preliminary experiments). Treatments were done at 6 ± 2 °C to minimize basal DNA strand breakage. A negative control (0.9% NaCl solution) was always included in each assay. The experiments were done at least three times.

Estimation of DNA strand breakage in E. johnstonei blood cells

DNA strand breakage in E. johnstonei blood cells was initially assayed by using the alkaline Comet assay, as described by Singh but with silver staining. Subsequently, DNA strand breakage was detected by the Comet assay as follows: E. johnstonei blood cells were centrifuged (10,000 rpm) and the pellet suspended in proteinase K solution (20 μL) prepared in PK buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM CaCl2, pH 8) at 40 μg/mL (concentration determined empirically). Aliquots (20 μL) of the cell suspension were mixed with 75 μL of 1% low melting point agarose and the mixture spread on slides containing a layer of 1.3% molecular grade agarose. The slides were covered with coverslips and incubated at 6 ± 2 °C for the agarose to solidify. After enzymatic lysis and agarose polymerization, the coverslips were removed and the slides were placed in a Comet assay tank (Cleaver Scientific Ltd, UK) containing cold alkaline electrophoresis buffer (0.3 N NaOH, 1 mM EDTA, pH 13) for 25 min. Electrophoresis was done at 25 V and current adjusted to 300 mA. The slides were routinely exposed to this current in the dark at 6 ± 2 °C for 30 min. After electrophoresis, the slides were placed in a staining tray and covered with a neutralizing buffer (0.4 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) in the dark for 5 min. Silver staining was done as indicated by Díaz . DNA damage was expressed as arbitrary units based on the classification of comets into five categories (0–4) proposed by Collins . The total amount of DNA strand breakage was expressed in total arbitrary units (AUT) defined as: AUT = N0 × 0 + N1 × 1 + N2 × 2 + N3 × 3 + N4 × 4, where N is the number of nuclei scored in each category (Collins, 2002). One hundred cells per slide and two slides per blood sample were analyzed using a Nikon Eclipse E200 microscope and the results from at least three independent experiments were averaged to obtain the AUT for each treatment. For the DNA diffusion assay (Singh, 2000a), the cells were processed in a similar manner to the Comet assay, except that the nuclei were not subjected to electrophoresis. Nuclei with a diameter > 3 times the mean nuclear diameter were considered apoptotic/necrotic (Nigro ). The total number of nuclei and the number of apoptotic/necrotic nuclei in each field were counted (minimum of 100 fields per slide) and the latter then expressed as a percentage of the former. As in the Comet assay, two slides per blood sample were analyzed and the results of at least three independent experiments were averaged to obtain the percentage of apoptotic/necrotic nuclei (%NAp/N) for each experiment. Based on the AUT and %NAp/N estimates, the proportion of remaining DNA strand breakages was calculated (in arbitrary units) as: where AUR corresponds to non-apoptotic/necrotic DNA strand breakages.

Statistical analysis

In all cases, the data passed the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and F-maximum tests for normality and variance homogeneity, respectively, so that parametric tests were used in subsequent data analyses. When a significant F-value was obtained in one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) the groups were subsequently compared with Students t-test. Product-moment (Pearson) correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship between mutagen doses and the average estimates of DNA damage. A value of p < 0.05 indicated significance. All statistical analyses were done with STATISTICA V.6 software (StatSoft Inc).

Results

Cellular lysis assays

In the present work, we used the Comet assay described by Singh to detect DNA strand breakage in E. johnstonei blood cells. These cells were not lysed by alkaline conditions and naked nuclei were not obtained. Although cells varied in their sensitivity to silver staining (Figure 1), neither the pH (between 10 and 13) of the incubation solution nor the length of incubation (2 h and 24 h) had any effect on the susceptibility to lysis (data not shown).
Figure 1

Differential response of E. johnstonei blood cells to silver staining during the alkaline lysis Comet assay: (A) Cells totally stained, (B) Cells with only cytoplasm stained, (C) Cells with only nuclei stained and (D) Unstained cells.

Since naked nuclei could not be obtained from E. johnstonei blood cells by the standard Comet procedure (Singh ), we compared the ability of alkaline, enzymatic and alkaline/enzymatic treatments to produce these nuclei, as assessed by the DNA diffusion assay (Singh, 2000a). Treatments that included enzymatic lysis (Figure 2B,C) were effective in producing naked nuclei from blood cells, in contrast to lysis by alkaline treatment (Figure 2A). Combined alkaline/enzymatic treatment (Figure 2B) was more aggressive to nuclear stability than enzymatic treatment (Figure 2C), as shown by the nuclear diameter. The Comet assay showed that alkaline/enzymatic treatment produced DNA damage after a very short exposure to alkaline lysis (AU5 min = 295 ± 11, AU10 min = 323 ± 7, AU15 min = 326 ± 9, AU30 min = 330 ± 11 and AU45 min = 361 ± 5). In this assay, the negative control had a mean arbitrary unit value (AU0 min) of 38 ± 5. In contrast to the enzymatic treatment at 37 °C overnight (Figure 2C), the nuclei were still intact after treatment at 6 ± 2 °C during agarose solidification (Figure 2D). Hence, subsequent experiments involving cell lysis were done using only enzymatic treatment at 6 ± 2 °C. Figure 3 shows images of the Comet categories established for E. johnstonei blood cells.
Figure 2

DNA diffusion assay images from E. johnstonei blood cells after: (A) alkaline lysis, (B) alkaline/enzymatic (40 μg/mL proteinase K) lysis at 37 °C overnight, (C) enzymatic (40 μg/mL proteinase K) lysis at 37 °C overnight, and (D) enzymatic (40 μg/mL proteinase K) lysis at 6 ± 2 °C during agarose solidification (10 min).

Figure 3

Visual comet classification into five categories (0–4) proposed by Collins . Images of comets (from E. johnstonei blood cells) stained with silver nitrate. APN: Apoptotic/necrotic nuclei detected by the DNA diffusion assay.

Table 1 shows the DNA strand breakage induced by BLM and 4NQO in E. johnstonei blood cells at different doses and incubation times. A marked dose-response relationship was observed for both doses and incubation times. Dose-response curves to BLM and 4NQO after a 12 h exposure (Table 2) showed marked correlations (R = 0.83 and 0.90, p ≤ 0.05; respectively). DNA strand breakage increased significantly (p ≤ 0.05) from a concentration of 4.7 μg/mL of BLM and 1.9 μM of 4NQO. The %NAp/N in E. johnstonei ranged from 0% to 8% (mean: 2.8%). The assay reproducibility under the conditions in this model was consistently high, with coefficients of variation ≤ 10%.
Table 1

Estimates of DNA damage in E. johnstonei blood cells exposed to BLM and 4NQO for different times.

TreatmentsLeukocyte DNA damage after exposure to mutagens for the indicated times

2 h (3)*4 h (3)6 h (3)10 h (3)12 h (3)





AUTAURAUTAURAUTAURAUTAURAUTAUR
NC42 ± 241 ± 241 ± 040 ± 070 ± 1268 ± 1273 ± 871 ± 872 ± 969 ± 9
BLM (4.7 μg/mL)78 ± 277 ± 281 ± 679 ± 6114 ± 12111 ± 12115 ± 16112 ± 16159 ± 13151 ± 13
BLM (9.5 μg/mL)82 ± 281 ± 292 ± 290 ± 2164 ± 16159 ± 16149 ± 10145 ± 10183 ± 12174 ± 12
BLM (19.0 μg/mL)89 ± 788 ± 7110 ± 3108 ± 3174 ± 14169 ± 14170 ± 9166 ± 9219 ± 7208 ± 7
BLM (38.0 μg/mL)99 ± 398 ± 3123 ± 4120 ± 4172 ± 9167 ± 9179 ± 16174 ± 16289 ± 13275 ± 13
BLM (76.0 μg/mL)101 ± 5100 ± 5139 ± 26137 ± 26159 ± 16154 ± 16209 ± 7204 ± 7293 ± 1279 ± 1
BLM (152.0 μg/mL)110 ± 3108 ± 3164 ± 15161 ± 15181 ± 7176 ± 7256 ± 6250 ± 6332 ± 8315 ± 8

NC79 ± 3079 ± 30100 ± 2100 ± 291 ± 1691 ± 1695 ± 495 ± 480 ± 180 ± 1
4NQO (1.9 μM)94 ± 1293 ± 12102 ± 1102 ± 1115 ± 2115 ± 2134 ± 26134 ± 26116 ± 11116 ± 11
4NQO (3.7 μM)92 ± 891 ± 8112 ± 8112 ± 8117 ± 4117 ± 4142 ± 1142 ± 1142 ± 9142 ± 9
4NQO (7.5 μM)67 ± 5767 ± 57116 ± 8116 ± 8139 ± 8139 ± 8179 ± 6179 ± 6184 ± 17184 ± 17
4NQO (15.0 μM)101 ± 10100 ± 10122 ± 4122 ± 4146 ± 11146 ± 11181 ± 2181 ± 2238 ± 0238 ± 0
4NQO (30.0 μM)97 ± 296 ± 2133 ± 5133 ± 5153 ± 9153 ± 9193 ± 0193 ± 0270 ± 5270 ± 5
4NQO (60.0 μM)102 ± 3102 ± 3128 ± 3128 ± 3162 ± 9162 ± 9196 ± 3196 ± 3308 ± 22308 ± 22

The values are the mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments with two replicate slides in each.

The total number of male frogs used per experiment with each mutagen. AU - arbitrary units, AUT - total DNA damage measured with the Comet assay, AUR - the remaining non-apoptotic/necrotic DNA damage, BLM - bleomycin, 4NQO - 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide and NC - negative control (0.9% NaCl solution). The %NAp/N (see Materials and Methods) was the percentage of apoptotic/necrotic nuclei counted in 100 slide fields, and ranged from 0% to 8%.

Table 2

Dose-response relationships between BLM and 4NQO concentrations and the estimated DNA damage. An exposure time of 12 h was used in all experiments.

TreatmentLeukocyte DNA damage after exposure to mutagen

Exp. 1 (3)Exp. 2 (3)Exp. 3 (3)Mean ± SEMCV (%)




AUTAURAUTAURAUTAURAUTAUR
NC72 ± 969 ± 987 ± 880 ± 865 ± 662 ± 675 ± 970 ± 910
BLM (4.7 μg/mL)159 ± 13 *151 ± 13 *142 ± 16 *131 ± 16 *145 ± 10 *139 ± 10 *149 ± 7140 ± 76
BLM (9.5 μg/mL)183 ± 12 *174 ± 12 *171 ± 16 *157 ± 16 *183 ± 10 *176 ± 10 *179 ± 6169 ± 64
BLM (19.0 μg/mL)219 ± 7 *208 ± 7 *220 ± 4 *202 ± 4 *240 ± 13 *231 ± 13 *226 ± 9213 ± 95
BLM (38.0 μg/mL)289 ± 13 *275 ± 13 *265 ± 10 *244 ± 10 *276 ± 14 *265 ± 14 *277 ± 10261 ± 104
BLM (76.0 μg/mL)293 ± 1 *279 ± 1 *299 ± 3 *275 ± 3 *296 ± 19 *285 ± 19 *296 ± 2279 ± 21
BLM (152.0 μg/mL)332 ± 8 *315 ± 8 *338 ± 9 *311 ± 9 *343 ± 3 *330 ± 3 *338 ± 4318 ± 42
r = 0.83 (p ≤ 0.05)

NC78 ± 778 ± 780 ± 180 ± 193 ± 693 ± 684 ± 784 ± 710
4NQO (1.9 μM)133 ± 6 *133 ± 6 *116 ± 11 *116 ± 11 *129 ± 3 *129 ± 3 *126 ± 7126 ± 77
4NQO (3.7 μM)147 ± 2 *147 ± 2 *142 ± 9 *142 ± 9 *155 ± 6 *155 ± 6 *148 ± 5148 ± 54
4NQO (7.5 μM)176 ± 16 *176 ± 16 *184 ± 17 *184 ± 17 *190 ± 3 *190 ± 3 *183 ± 6183 ± 64
4NQO (15.0 μM)227 ± 9 *227 ± 9 *238 ± 0 *238 ± 0 *222 ± 11 *222 ± 11 *229 ± 7229 ± 74
4NQO (30.0 μM)261 ± 2 *261 ± 2 *270 ± 5 *270 ± 5 *257 ± 5 *257 ± 5 *263 ± 5263 ± 53
4NQO (60.0 μM)316 ± 8 *316 ± 8 *308 ± 22 *308 ± 22 *299 ± 21 *299 ± 21 *308 ± 7308 ± 73
r = 0.90 (p ≤ 0.05)

The values are the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments with two replicate slides in each. The total number of male frogs used per experiment with each mutagen is shown in parentheses. The average values from the three experiments are shown. AU - arbitrary units, AUT - total DNA damage measured with the Comet assay, AUR - the remaining non-apoptotic/necrotic DNA damage, BLM - bleomycin, CV - coefficient of variation (%), 4NQO - 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide, NC - negative control (0.9% NaCl solution) and r - Pearson correlation coefficient. The %NAp/N (see Materials and Methods) was the percentage of apoptotic/necrotic nuclei counted in 100 slide fields, and ranged from 0% to 8%.

p < 0.05 compared to the negative control (NC) (ANOVA followed by Student’s t-test).

Discussion

In this work, we used a modified Comet assay to detect DNA strand breakage in the direct-developing frog E. johnstonei. Previous studies of DNA damage in frogs used alkaline treatment to lyse the cells prior to analysis by the Comet assay (Table 3). Alkaline conditions are generally sufficient to cause cellular lysis in all frog species. Eleutherodactylus johnstonei blood cells were resistant to tolerant to alkaline treatment in the standard procedure (Singh ). This finding suggests that E. johnstonei contains alkali-resistant but proteinase K-sensitive proteins that stabilize and/or protect the nuclei. The Comet assay with enzymatic (proteinase K) lysis has been used to assess DNA intactness in mammalian sperm cells (Baumgartner ), which have highly compact nuclear DNA (Ward and Coffey, 1991). Proteinase K digests proteins associated with nuclei and eliminates DNA-protein bonds generated by some xenobiotics, action that facilitates the electrophoretic migration of damaged DNA (Merk ; Singh, 2000b).
Table 3

Cellular lysis conditions used in different studies to detect DNA damage by the Comet assay in frogs.

Genetic model*Cell typeBuffer compositionLysis conditionsReferences
pHTemperatureTime
Anaxyrus americanusLithobates catesbeianusLithobates clamitansErythrocytesBuffer 1: 2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM Na2EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 10% DMSO, 1% sodium sarcosinate, pH 10alkalineRoom temperature2 hRalph et al. (1996)Clements et al. (1997)Ralph and Petras (1998a)
Anaxyrus americanusLithobates clamitansEuphlyctis hexadactylusLithobates pipiensErythrocytesBuffer 2: 2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM Na2EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 10% DMSO, 1% sodium sarcosinate, 1% Triton X-100, pH 10alkalineRoom temperature2 hRalph and Petras (1997)Ralph and Petras (1998b)Rajaguru et al. (2001)
Fejervarya limnocharisPelophylax nigromaculataErythrocytesBuffer 2alkalineRoom temperature1 hFeng et al. (2004)Liu et al. (2011)
Xenopus laevisSilurana tropicalisLymphocytesBuffer 2alkalineOn ice (0 °C)30 minBanner et al. (2006)
Pseudepidalea raddeiHepatocytesBuffer 2alkaline4 °C1 hLiu et al. (2006)
Bufo gargarizansPseudepidalea raddeiErythrocytesHepatocytesBuffer 2alkaline4 °C2 hHuang et al. (2007)Yin et al. (2008)Yin et al. (2009)
Pelophylax nigromaculataTesticular cellsBuffer 3: 2.5 M NaCl, 10 mM Na2EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 10% DMSO, 1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, pH 10alkaline4 °C2–4 hWang and Jia (2009)
Pelophylax lessonaeXenopus laevisErythrocytesBuffer 4: 2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM Na2EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 10% DMSO, 1% Triton X-100, pH 10alkaline4 °C1 hMaselli et al. (2010)Mouchet et al. (2006)
Eleutherodactylus johnstoneiErythrocytesBuffer 5: 50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 0.04 mg/mL proteinase K, 0.8% LGT agarose, pH 8neutralKept at 6 ± 2 °C for solidification10 minPresent work

Anuran species names follow Frost (2011).

First reported by Singh .

The intactness of sperm DNA is regularly analyzed with the Comet assay after alkaline and enzymatic treatments (Speit ). However, alkaline/enzymatic treatment was particularly aggressive to nuclear stability in E. johnstonei blood cells. For this reason, we used a neutral (pH 8) and single enzymatic digestion with proteinase K in situ in agarose gels; this procedure considerably reduced the assay costs and time. The temperature during cellular lysis is another critical variable that affects basal DNA damage in the Comet assay, as indicated in previous reports (Speit ; Banáth ). In E. johnstonei erythrocytes, enzymatic lysis at low temperature (6 ± 2 °C) was ideal for obtaining naked nuclei with low levels of basal DNA damage. The results described here show that the Comet assay can provide a good estimation of DNA damage in E. johnstonei. The assay was reproducible and sensitive enough to detect DNA strand breakage in E. johnstonei blood cells. The basal DNA damage estimated for the species agreed with previously reported values (Collins ). In addition, the DNA damage observed here was poorly associated to apoptosis and necrosis, in contrast to the situation in humans (Tice ), sea lions (El-Zein ) and dolphins (Díaz ). This study has shown the usefulness of amphibians as bio-indicators. A simultaneous study (Meza-Joya et al., in preparation) in our laboratory examined the toxic and genotoxic effects of a glyphosate-based herbicide (Roundup®SL - Cosmoflux®411F) on E. johnstonei. The study again showed that the Comet assay was highly sensitive for detecting DNA damage induced by this herbicide. This finding suggests that the Comet assay is an accurate method for detecting DNA damage in E. johnstonei after exposure to environmental xenobiotics. In conclusion, the alkaline Comet assay (Singh ) was inappropriate for measuring DNA strand breakage in E. johnstonei. Alkaline lysis can be replaced by enzymatic lysis (proteinase K), with good results. In contrast, combined alkaline/enzymatic treatment or long incubations (overnight) at 37 °C with proteinase K generate unstable nuclei and result in consistently elevated basal DNA damage. The contribution of apoptosis and necrosis to the overall DNA damage in E. johnstonei was negligible, as assessed by the Comet assay. The Comet assay is a reproducible, sensitive method for detecting DNA strand breakage in E. johnstonei.
  39 in total

1.  Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. 4th International Comet Assay Workshop.

Authors:  A Hartmann; E Agurell; C Beevers; S Brendler-Schwaab; B Burlinson; P Clay; A Collins; A Smith; G Speit; V Thybaud; R R Tice
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Growth and survival of five amphibian species exposed to combinations of pesticides.

Authors:  Rick A Relyea
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Impacts of the herbicide butachlor on the larvae of a paddy field breeding frog (Fejervarya limnocharis) in subtropical Taiwan.

Authors:  Wan-Yi Liu; Ching-Yuh Wang; Tsu-Shing Wang; Gary M Fellers; Bo-Chi Lai; Yeong-Choy Kam
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 4.  The comet assay as an indicator test for germ cell genotoxicity.

Authors:  Günter Speit; Marie Vasquez; Andreas Hartmann
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-03-30       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  A simple method for accurate estimation of apoptotic cells.

Authors:  N P Singh
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2000-04-10       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Genotoxicity of select herbicides in Rana catesbeiana tadpoles using the alkaline single-cell gel DNA electrophoresis (comet) assay.

Authors:  C Clements; S Ralph; M Petras
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Genotoxicity of some sulfur dyes on tadpoles (Rana hexadactyla) measured using the comet assay.

Authors:  P Rajaguru; R Kalpana; A Hema; S Suba; B Baskarasethupathi; P A Kumar; K Kalaiselvi
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Synergistic impacts of malathion and predatory stress on six species of North American tadpoles.

Authors:  Rick A Relyea
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Comet Assay measurements: a perspective.

Authors:  T S Kumaravel; Barbara Vilhar; Stephen P Faux; Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 6.691

10.  Genotoxicity evaluation of chlorpyrifos to amphibian Chinese toad (Amphibian: Anura) by Comet assay and Micronucleus test.

Authors:  XiaoHui Yin; GuoNian Zhu; Xian Bing Li; ShaoYing Liu
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  2 in total

1.  Detecting genomic damages in the frog Dendropsophus minutus: preserved versus perturbed areas.

Authors:  M W Gonçalves; T B Vieira; N M Maciel; W F Carvalho; L S F Lima; P G Gambale; A D da Cruz; F Nomura; R P Bastos; D M Silva
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  The Comet Assay and its applications in the field of ecotoxicology: a mature tool that continues to expand its perspectives.

Authors:  Joaquín de Lapuente; Joana Lourenço; Sónia A Mendo; Miquel Borràs; Marta G Martins; Pedro M Costa; Mário Pacheco
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.599

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.