Literature DB >> 18040874

Comet Assay measurements: a perspective.

T S Kumaravel1, Barbara Vilhar, Stephen P Faux, Awadhesh N Jha.   

Abstract

The Comet Assay or single cell gel electrophoresis assay is one of the very widely used assays to microscopically detect DNA damage at the level of a single cell. The determination of damage is carried out either through visual scoring of cells (after classification into different categories on the basis of tail length and shape) or by using different commercially available or public domain software (which automatically recognise the extent of damage). In this assay, the shape, size and amount of DNA within the 'comet' play important roles in the determination of the level of damage. The use of a software in particular also provides a range of different parameters, many of which might not be relevant in determining the extent of DNA damage. As a large number of factors could influence the shape, size, identification and determination of induced damage, which includes the scoring criteria, staining techniques, selection of parameters (whilst using the software packages) and appearance of 'hedgehog' or 'clouds', this article aims (a) to provide an overview of evolution of measurements of DNA damage using the Comet Assay and (b) to summarise and critically analyse the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches currently being adopted whilst using this assay. It is suggested that judicious selection of different parameters, staining methods along with inter-laboratory validation and harmonisation of methodologies will further help in making this assay more robust and widely acceptable for scientific as well as regulatory studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18040874     DOI: 10.1007/s10565-007-9043-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol        ISSN: 0742-2091            Impact factor:   6.691


  47 in total

1.  Automated segmentation of comet assay images using Gaussian filtering and fuzzy clustering.

Authors:  Mario Sansone; Olga Zeni; Giovanni Esposito
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Transcriptional responses and embryotoxic effects induced by pyrene and methylpyrene in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) early life stages exposed to spiked sediments.

Authors:  Iris Barjhoux; Jérôme Cachot; Patrice Gonzalez; Hélène Budzinski; Karyn Le Menach; Laure Landi; Bénédicte Morin; Magalie Baudrimont
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Use of statistical analysis to validate ecogenotoxicology findings arising from various comet assay components.

Authors:  Bilal Hussain; Tayyaba Sultana; Salma Sultana; Khalid Abdullah Al-Ghanim; Muhammad Shahreef Masoud; Shahid Mahboob
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Evaluating the potential genotoxicity of phthalates esters (PAEs) in perfumes using in vitro assays.

Authors:  Iman Al-Saleh; Tahreer Al-Rajudi; Ghofran Al-Qudaihi; Pulicat Manogaran
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Relative sensitivity of two marine bivalves for detection of genotoxic and cytotoxic effects: a field assessment in the Tamar Estuary, South West England.

Authors:  Lorna J Dallas; Victoria V Cheung; Andrew S Fisher; Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and DNA damage as an indicator of environmental stress in fish of different feeding habits of Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz, Mexico.

Authors:  Donaji J González-Mille; César A Ilizaliturri-Hernández; Guillermo Espinosa-Reyes; Rogelio Costilla-Salazar; Fernando Díaz-Barriga; Irina Ize-Lema; Jesús Mejía-Saavedra
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Assessment of sperm quality in palaemonid prawns using Comet assay: methodological optimization.

Authors:  Alexandre Erraud; Marc Bonnard; Aurélie Duflot; Alain Geffard; Jean-Michel Danger; Joëlle Forget-Leray; Benoît Xuereb
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology.

Authors:  Bryant C Nelson; Christa W Wright; Yuko Ibuki; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Hanna L Karlsson; Giel Hendriks; Christopher M Sims; Neenu Singh; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.000

9.  Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming.

Authors:  Carla Costa; Julia García-Lestón; Solange Costa; Patrícia Coelho; Susana Silva; Marta Pingarilho; Vanessa Valdiglesias; Francesca Mattei; Valentina Dall'Armi; Stefano Bonassi; Blanca Laffon; John Snawder; João Paulo Teixeira
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 10.  Radiation microbeams as spatial and temporal probes of subcellular and tissue response.

Authors:  Giuseppe Schettino; Shahnaz T Al Rashid; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.433

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.