Literature DB >> 12473734

Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. 4th International Comet Assay Workshop.

A Hartmann1, E Agurell, C Beevers, S Brendler-Schwaab, B Burlinson, P Clay, A Collins, A Smith, G Speit, V Thybaud, R R Tice.   

Abstract

The in vivo alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay, hereafter the Comet assay, can be used to investigate the genotoxicity of industrial chemicals, biocides, agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals. The major advantages of this assay include the relative ease of application to any tissue of interest, the detection of multiple classes of DNA damage and the generation of data at the level of the single cell. These features give the Comet assay potential advantages over other in vivo test methods, which are limited largely to proliferating cells and/or a single tissue. The Comet assay has demonstrated its reliability in many testing circumstances and is, in general, considered to be acceptable for regulatory purposes. However, despite the considerable data published on the in vivo Comet assay and the general agreement within the international scientific community over many protocol-related issues, it was felt that a document giving detailed practical guidance on the protocol required for regulatory acceptance of the assay was required. In a recent meeting held in conjunction with the 4th International Comet Assay Workshop (Ulm, Germany, 22-25 July 2001) an expert panel reviewed existing data and recent developments of the Comet assay with a view to developing such a document. This paper is intended to act as an update to the more general guidelines which were published as a result of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures. The recommendations are also seen as a major step towards gaining more formal regulatory acceptance of the Comet assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12473734     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/18.1.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  150 in total

1.  Is tartrazine really safe? In silico and ex vivo toxicological studies in human leukocytes: a question of dose.

Authors:  Jassana Moreira Floriano; Emanoeli da Rosa; Queila Daiane Fonseca do Amaral; Luísa Zuravski; Pamella Eduardha Espindola Chaves; Michel Mansur Machado; Luís Flávio Souza de Oliveira
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 2.  How accurate is in vitro prediction of carcinogenicity?

Authors:  Richard Maurice Walmsley; Nicholas Billinton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Analysis of Biomarkers of DNA Damage and Mutagenicity in Mice Exposed to Acrylonitrile.

Authors:  Vernon E Walker; Dale M Walker; Burhan I Ghanayem; George R Douglas
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Nucleosomes effectively shield DNA from radiation damage in living cells.

Authors:  Francesca Brambilla; Jose Manuel Garcia-Manteiga; Emanuele Monteleone; Lena Hoelzen; Angelica Zocchi; Alessandra Agresti; Marco E Bianchi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Alkylation-induced genotoxicity as a predictor of DNA repair deficiency following experimental oral carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Juliana G Carvalho; Juliana Noguti; Victor Hugo P da Silva; Rogério A Dedivitis; Marcello Franco; Daniel A Ribeiro
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.611

6.  Vitamin D Supplementation Reverses DNA Damage and Telomeres Shortening Caused by Ovariectomy in Hippocampus of Wistar Rats.

Authors:  Cassiana Siebert; Tiago Marcon Dos Santos; Carolina Gessinger Bertó; Mariana Migliorini Parisi; Ritiéle Pinto Coelho; Vanusa Manfredini; Florencia M Barbé-Tuana; Angela T S Wyse
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.911

7.  Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of glass ionomer cements on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells.

Authors:  Daniel Araki Ribeiro; Mariangela Esther Alencar Marques; Daisy Maria Favero Salvadori
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Zinc supplementation reduced DNA breaks in Ethiopian women.

Authors:  Maya L Joray; Tian-Wei Yu; Emily Ho; Stephen L Clarke; Zeno Stanga; Tafere Gebreegziabher; K Michael Hambidge; Barbara J Stoecker
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Ductular reaction, cytokeratin 7 positivity, and gamma-glutamyl transferase in multistage hepatocarcinogenesis in rats.

Authors:  Andrea Janz Moreira; Graziella Ramos Rodrigues; Silvia Bona; Leila Xavier Sinigaglia Fratta; Giovana Regina Weber; Jaqueline Nascimento Picada; Jorge Luiz Dos Santos; Carlos Thadeu Cerski; Claudio Augusto Marroni; Norma Possa Marroni
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.356

10.  Brain effect of insulin and clonazepam in diabetic rats under depressive-like behavior.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Yasin Wayhs; Caroline Paula Mescka; Camila Simioni Vanzin; Graziela Schmitt Ribas; Gilian Guerreiro; Maurício Schüler Nin; Vanusa Manfredini; Helena Maria Tannhauser Barros; Carmen Regla Vargas
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.