Literature DB >> 18462987

The comet assay as an indicator test for germ cell genotoxicity.

Günter Speit1, Marie Vasquez, Andreas Hartmann.   

Abstract

The in vivo comet assay is a well-established genotoxicity test. It is currently mainly performed with somatic cells from different organs to detect a genotoxic activity of potential carcinogens. It is regarded as a useful test for follow-up testing of positive or equivocal in vitro test results and for the evaluation of local genotoxicity. However, the comet assay also has the potential to detect germ cell genotoxicity and may be used for demonstrating the ability of a substance or its metabolite(s) to directly interact with the genetic material of gonadal and/or germ cells. Such results are important for the classification of germ cell mutagens, e.g. in the context of the "Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals" (GHS). This review summarizes and discusses available information on the use of the comet assay with germ cells and cells from the gonads in genetic toxicology. The literature contains results from in vitro studies, ex vivo studies and in vivo studies. With regard to the assessment of germ cell genotoxicity, only in vivo studies are relevant but the other kind of studies provided important information on various aspects of the methodology. Many comet assay studies with human sperm have been performed in the context of male infertility and assisted fertilization. The results of these studies are not reviewed in detail here but various aspects of the assay modifications used are discussed. Measuring DNA effects by the comet assay in sperm requires additional steps for chromatin decondensation. Many different modifications of the alkaline and the neutral comet assay are in use but a standard protocol has not been established yet. High and variable background levels of DNA effects were reported and there is still need for standardization and validation of the comet assay with sperm. Some human biomonitoring studies with human sperm were published, but it seems to be premature to use these data for hazard identification and classification of chemicals. In contrast, the standard alkaline in vivo comet assay can easily be adapted to investigations with cells from reproductive organs. Tests with cells from the gonads (testis and ovary) seem to be most appropriate and a promising tool for demonstrating that a test compound reaches the gonads and is able to interact with the genetic material of germ cells. However, studies to standardize and validate these methods are necessary before the comet assay can be usefully applied in risk assessment of germ cell mutagens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18462987     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  18 in total

1.  Cytogentic analysis of human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) in early and late passages using both karyotyping and comet assay techniques.

Authors:  Mehdi Allahbakhshian-Farsani; Narges Abdian; Payam Ghasemi-Dehkordi; Marzieh Sadeghiani; Javad Saffari-Chaleshtori; Morteza Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori; Somayeh Khosravi-Farsani
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  A comparison of transgenic rodent mutation and in vivo comet assay responses for 91 chemicals.

Authors:  David Kirkland; Dan D Levy; Matthew J LeBaron; Marilyn J Aardema; Carol Beevers; Javed Bhalli; George R Douglas; Patricia A Escobar; Christopher S Farabaugh; Melanie Guerard; George E Johnson; Rohan Kulkarni; Frank Le Curieux; Alexandra S Long; Jasmin Lott; David P Lovell; Mirjam Luijten; Francesco Marchetti; John J Nicolette; Stefan Pfuhler; Daniel J Roberts; Leon F Stankowski; Veronique Thybaud; Sandy K Weiner; Andrew Williams; Kristine L Witt; Robert Young
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.873

3.  Repeated vitrification/warming of human sperm gives better results than repeated slow programmable freezing.

Authors:  Teraporn Vutyavanich; Worashorn Lattiwongsakorn; Waraporn Piromlertamorn; Sudarat Samchimchom
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Combination of swim-up and density gradient separation methods effectively eliminate DNA damaged sperm.

Authors:  Surveen Ghumman; Satish Kumar Adiga; Dinesh Upadhya; Guruprasad Kalthur; Varshini Jayaraman; Satish Bola Rao; Pratap Kumar
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01

5.  Impact of DNA damage on the frequency of sperm chromosomal aneuploidy in normal and subfertile men.

Authors:  Hamid Alizadeh Nili; Hossein Mozdarani; Franck Pellestor
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2011

6.  Assessment of sperm quality in palaemonid prawns using Comet assay: methodological optimization.

Authors:  Alexandre Erraud; Marc Bonnard; Aurélie Duflot; Alain Geffard; Jean-Michel Danger; Joëlle Forget-Leray; Benoît Xuereb
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  HT-COMET: a novel automated approach for high throughput assessment of human sperm chromatin quality.

Authors:  Océane Albert; Wolfgang E Reintsch; Peter Chan; Bernard Robaire
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-03-13       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Comet assay: a versatile but complex tool in genotoxicity testing.

Authors:  Eugenia Cordelli; Margherita Bignami; Francesca Pacchierotti
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.524

9.  Rationale for further medical and health research on high-potency sweeteners.

Authors:  Susan S Schiffman
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Combining the in vivo comet and micronucleus assays: a practical approach to genotoxicity testing and data interpretation.

Authors:  Marie Z Vasquez
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.