| Literature DB >> 22214227 |
Geoff Warnock1, Mohamed-Ali Bahri, David Goblet, Fabrice Giacomelli, Christian Lemaire, Joel Aerts, Alain Seret, Xavier Langlois, Andre Luxen, Alain Plenevaux.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Kinetic modeling of physiological function using imaging techniques requires the accurate measurement of the time-activity curve of the tracer in plasma, known as the arterial input function (IF). The measurement of IF can be achieved through manual blood sampling, the use of small counting systems such as beta microprobes, or by derivation from PET images. Previous studies using beta microprobe systems to continuously measure IF have suffered from high background counts.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22214227 PMCID: PMC3250971 DOI: 10.1186/2191-219X-1-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res Impact factor: 3.138
Figure 1The shunt apparatus. (a) The shunt apparatus mounted on the acrylic stand with adjustable clamps (upper probe mount and tip location inlaid); (b) Diagram illustrating the design of the shunt, with T-connections for blood pressure measurement, probe insertion, and intravenous infusion. The peristaltic pump is connected after the probe in series in order to prevent backflow from the IV infusion connection affecting probe measurements.
Figure 2Mean arterial input functions derived from the three methodologies. Individual input functions were corrected for injected activity and aligned by the point of peak activity. Individual data points represent mean ± SEM. (Figures displaying the individual input functions in overlay are available as supplementary data).
Area under the curve ratio between probe-derived, image-derived and manually sampled input functions
| Subject | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||||
| AUC | AUC | AUC | AUC | AUC | AUC | AUC | AUC | Mean | SD | COV | |
| Unfitted IF | |||||||||||
| Probe IF | 21,173 | 27,576 | 19,765 | 19,024 | 23,710 | 17,389 | 33,630 | 19,448 | |||
| Manual IF | 20,246 | 26,385 | 18,418 | 17,265 | 22,878 | 15,270 | 30,684 | 19,538 | |||
| Image-derived IF | 13,283 | 27,099 | 9,486 | 19,543 | 14,565 | 14,563 | 16,506 | 12,149 | |||
| Probe/manual | 1.046 | 1.045 | 1.073 | 1.102 | 1.036 | 1.139 | 1.096 | 0.995 | 1.067 | 0.045 | 0.042 |
| Pet/manual | 0.656 | 1.027 | 0.515 | 1.132 | 0.637 | 0.954 | 0.538 | 0.622 | 0.760 | 0.240 | 0.315 |
| Probe/PET | 1.594 | 1.018 | 2.084 | 0.973 | 1.628 | 1.194 | 2.037 | 1.601 | 1.516 | 0.425 | 0.281 |
| Fitted IF | |||||||||||
| Probe IF | 21,720 | 27,762 | 19,866 | 18,595 | 23,573 | 17,347 | 33,434 | 19,344 | |||
| Manual IF | 20,981 | 26,414 | 18,500 | 17,602 | 23,402 | 15,226 | 30,297 | 19,693 | |||
| Image-derived IF | 13,533 | 26,243 | 9,094.8 | 19,158 | 14,793 | 11,393 | 16,937 | 12,574 | |||
| Probe/manual | 1.035 | 1.051 | 1.074 | 1.056 | 1.007 | 1.139 | 1.104 | 0.982 | 1.056 | 0.050 | 0.048 |
| Pet/manual | 0.645 | 0.994 | 0.492 | 1.088 | 0.632 | 0.748 | 0.559 | 0.639 | 0.725 | 0.210 | 0.290 |
| Probe/PET | 1.605 | 1.058 | 2.184 | 0.971 | 1.594 | 1.523 | 1.974 | 1.538 | 1.556 | 0.408 | 0.262 |
AUC, area under curve; COV, coefficient of variation; IF, input function; SD, standard deviation.
Bi-exponential fit slope constants for probe-derived, image-derived and manually sampled input functions
| Subject | Mean | SD | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |||
| Slope 1 | ||||||||||
| Probe IF | 4.609 | 4.181 | 3.646 | 3.470 | 4.989 | 3.552 | 3.181 | 3.658 | 3.911 | 0.582 |
| Manual IF | 7.627 | 4.847 | 3.646 | 7.746 | 5.582 | 6.038 | 3.215 | 4.591 | 5.411 | 1.570 |
| Image-derived IF | 11.626 | 7.983 | 8.705 | 10.502 | 9.327 | 6.343 | 5.888 | 8.149 | 8.565 | 1.815 |
| Slope 2 | ||||||||||
| Probe IF | 0.048 | 0.038 | 0.046 | 0.028 | 0.047 | 0.025 | 0.039 | 0.038 | 0.039 | 0.008 |
| Manual IF | 0.042 | 0.018 | 0.050 | 0.043 | 0.039 | 0.031 | 0.008 | 0.026 | 0.032 | 0.013 |
| Image-derived IF | 0.095 | 0.068 | 0.051 | 0.056 | 0.082 | 0.040 | 0.059 | 0.072 | 0.065 | 0.017 |
IF, input function; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 3Shunt length, flow rate, and arterial source. (a) Effect of shunt length on dispersion of the input function peak (first 5 min shown). Data aligned for start of peak and corrected for injected activity for comparison purposes. (b) Effect of shunt flow rate on input function shape. (i) Effect of increasing pump speed (inset: first 5 min); (ii) Effect of reducing pump speed (inset: first 5 min). Data aligned for start of peak and injected activity for comparison urposes. (c) Comparison of input functions derived from femoral artery-femoral vein shunt to carotid artery-femoral vein shunt (first 5 min shown). Data from two individual subjects. Data aligned for start of peak and corrected for injected activity for comparison purposes.