Literature DB >> 26900037

Finite element simulation of articular contact mechanics with quadratic tetrahedral elements.

Steve A Maas1, Benjamin J Ellis1, David S Rawlins1, Jeffrey A Weiss2.   

Abstract

Although it is easier to generate finite element discretizations with tetrahedral elements, trilinear hexahedral (HEX8) elements are more often used in simulations of articular contact mechanics. This is due to numerical shortcomings of linear tetrahedral (TET4) elements, limited availability of quadratic tetrahedron elements in combination with effective contact algorithms, and the perceived increased computational expense of quadratic finite elements. In this study we implemented both ten-node (TET10) and fifteen-node (TET15) quadratic tetrahedral elements in FEBio (www.febio.org) and compared their accuracy, robustness in terms of convergence behavior and computational cost for simulations relevant to articular contact mechanics. Suitable volume integration and surface integration rules were determined by comparing the results of several benchmark contact problems. The results demonstrated that the surface integration rule used to evaluate the contact integrals for quadratic elements affected both convergence behavior and accuracy of predicted stresses. The computational expense and robustness of both quadratic tetrahedral formulations compared favorably to the HEX8 models. Of note, the TET15 element demonstrated superior convergence behavior and lower computational cost than both the TET10 and HEX8 elements for meshes with similar numbers of degrees of freedom in the contact problems that we examined. Finally, the excellent accuracy and relative efficiency of these quadratic tetrahedral elements was illustrated by comparing their predictions with those for a HEX8 mesh for simulation of articular contact in a fully validated model of the hip. These results demonstrate that TET10 and TET15 elements provide viable alternatives to HEX8 elements for simulation of articular contact mechanics.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Articular cartilage; Biomechanics; Finite element; Joint; Tetrahedron

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26900037      PMCID: PMC4801678          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  23 in total

1.  An evaluation of three-dimensional diarthrodial joint contact using penetration data and the finite element method.

Authors:  W L Dunbar; K Un; P S Donzelli; R L Spilker
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Requirements for mesh resolution in 3D computational hemodynamics.

Authors:  S Prakash; C R Ethier
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Finite element methods for the biomechanics of soft hydrated tissues: nonlinear analysis and adaptive control of meshes.

Authors:  R L Spilker; E S de Almeida; P S Donzelli
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1992

4.  Physical validation of a patient-specific contact finite element model of the ankle.

Authors:  Donald D Anderson; Jane K Goldsworthy; Wendy Li; M James Rudert; Yuki Tochigi; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Subchondral cysts create increased intra-osseous stress in early knee OA: A finite element analysis using simulated lesions.

Authors:  David D McErlain; Jaques S Milner; Todor G Ivanov; Lubica Jencikova-Celerin; Steven I Pollmann; David W Holdsworth
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  An alternative method of three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional CT and MR data sets.

Authors:  W Wrazidlo; H J Brambs; W Lederer; S Schneider; B Geiger; C Fischer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Adaptive local regularization methods for the inverse ECG problem.

Authors:  C R Johnson; R S MacLeod
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.667

8.  Computationally efficient magnetic resonance imaging based surface contact modeling as a tool to evaluate joint injuries and outcomes of surgical interventions compared to finite element modeling.

Authors:  Joshua E Johnson; Phil Lee; Terence E McIff; E Bruce Toby; Kenneth J Fischer
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Adaptive finite-element approach for analysis of bone/prosthesis interaction.

Authors:  P F Hübsch; J Middleton; E A Meroi; A N Natali
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  A Lagrange multiplier mixed finite element formulation for three-dimensional contact of biphasic tissues.

Authors:  Taiseung Yang; Robert L Spilker
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  FEBio: History and Advances.

Authors:  Steve A Maas; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  A Plugin Framework for Extending the Simulation Capabilities of FEBio.

Authors:  Steve A Maas; Steven A LaBelle; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Hip chondrolabral mechanics during activities of daily living: Role of the labrum and interstitial fluid pressurization.

Authors:  Jocelyn N Todd; Travis G Maak; Gerard A Ateshian; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Model for in-vivo estimation of stiffness of tibiofemoral joint using MR imaging and FEM analysis.

Authors:  Sandeep Panwar Jogi; Rafeek Thaha; Sriram Rajan; Vidur Mahajan; Vasantha Kumar Venugopal; Anup Singh; Amit Mehndiratta
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Sensitivity of the stress field of the proximal femur predicted by CT-based FE analysis to modeling uncertainties.

Authors:  Sina Youssefian; Jarred A Bressner; Mikhail Osanov; James K Guest; Wojciech B Zbijewski; Adam S Levin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.102

6.  Finite Element Modelling Simulated Meniscus Translocation and Deformation during Locomotion of the Equine Stifle.

Authors:  Pasquale Zellmann; Iris Ribitsch; Stephan Handschuh; Christian Peham
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.