Literature DB >> 19903512

Reorienting when cues conflict: A role for information content in spatial learning?

Bradley R Sturz1, Stephanie M Diemer.   

Abstract

In two experiments, human participants searched in dynamic three-dimensional virtual-environment rectangular enclosures. Unlike previous studies involving learning of features and geometry, we trained features and geometry separately before placing them in conflict. Specifically, participants learned to respond to rewarded features located along the principle axis of a rectangular search space and to respond to rewarded geometry of a rectangular search space in separate training phases followed by a single test trial. During the test trial, features and geometry were placed in conflict by situating rewarded bins during feature training in unrewarded geometric corners from geometry training and unrewarded bins during feature training in rewarded geometric corners from geometry training. Results of Experiment 1 indicated that although all participants learned features and geometry at an equivalent rate and to an equivalent level, performance during the test trial indicated no preferential responding to features or geometry. However, choice reaction time was significantly longer during the test trial compared to that of last feature and last geometry training trials. Experiment 2 attempted to dissociate information content of features and geometry from their acquired associative strength by rewarding only one geometric corner during geometry training. Results of Experiment 2 indicated that although features had presumably acquired greater associative strength relative to that of geometry by the end of training, performance during the test trial indicated no preferential responding to features or geometry. As in Experiment 1, choice reaction time was significantly longer during the test trial compared to that of last feature and last geometry training trials. Collectively, results seem to provide converging evidence against a view-based matching account of spatial learning, appear inconsistent with standard associative-based accounts of spatial learning, and suggest that information content of spatial cues may play an important role in spatial learning. 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19903512     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  5 in total

1.  Encoding of variability of landmark-based spatial information.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-02-24

2.  Overtraining and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Katherine A Gaskin; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-01-03

3.  Sex differences and the effect of instruction on reorientation abilities by humans.

Authors:  Megan N Siemens; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-05

4.  Attentional reorienting triggers spatial asymmetries in a search task with cross-modal spatial cueing.

Authors:  Rebecca E Paladini; Lorenzo Diana; Giuseppe A Zito; Thomas Nyffeler; Patric Wyss; Urs P Mosimann; René M Müri; Tobias Nef; Dario Cazzoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Older Adults Show Less Flexible Spatial Cue Use When Navigating in a Virtual Reality Environment Compared With Younger Adults.

Authors:  Kazushige Kimura; James F Reichert; Debbie M Kelly; Zahra Moussavi
Journal:  Neurosci Insights       Date:  2019-12-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.